Molecules 2020, 25, 1934
13 of 17
one hour. On cooling, the precipitated crude product was filtered, washed with cold ethanol, dried,
and crystallized from EtOH to yield (3.17 g, 95%) of compound as transparent pale yellow crystals.
Single crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction were obtained by slow evaporation of a solution of the title
2
◦
1
compound in EtOH/CHCl (1:2, v/v) at room temperature. Mp: 233–235 C. H-NMR: δ 11.24 (s, 1H,
3
NH), 8.68 (s, 1H, CH=N), 8.12 (d, 1H, Thiophene-H, J = 4.2 Hz), 7.51 (d, 1H, Thiophene-H, J = 4.2 Hz),
.02 (s, 3H, Adamantane-H), 1.87 (s, 6H, adamantane-H), 1.68–1.73 (m, 6H, adamantane-H). 1 C-NMR:
3
2
δ
174.18 (C=O), 151.03, 147.73, 130.99, 129.58 (Thiophene-C), 140.63 (CH=N), 39.74, 38.55, 36.42, 27.96
(adamantane-C).
The selected suitable single crystals of compounds
1
and 2 were mounted using polybutene oil
on a flexible loop fixed on a goniometer head and immediately transferred to the diffractometer.
Pre-experiment, data collection, data reduction, and analytical absorption correction [45] were
performed with the program suite CrysAlisPro [46] using the Olex2 program [47]. The structures were
solved with the SHELXT [48] small molecule structure solution program and refined with the SHELXL
2
2
018/3 program package [49] by full-matrix least-squares minimization on F . PLATON [50] was used
to check the result of the X-ray analysis. For more details about the data collection and refinement
parameters, see the CIF files.
3
.3. Computational Details
3
.3.1. Hirshfeld Surface Analysis
Hirshfeld surfaces were calculated in order to provide a semi-quantitative analysis of
intermolecular interactions using CRYSTAL EXPLORER17 [51]. The normalized contact distance
(dnorm), mapped throughout the surface, is defined as:
vdW
vdW
e
vdW
d − r
i
de − r
i
dnorm =
+
vdW
r
r
e
i
where d
e
and d represent the distances from a point on the surface to the nearest nucleus outside and
i
vdW
inside the surface, respectively, and r
involved. Based on that information, a 2D fingerprint plot of d
corresponds to the van der Waals (vdW) radii of the atoms
vs. d distances within the surface and
e
i
their frequency was determined to provide quantitative information on the interactions throughout
the crystal structure [52,53].
3
.3.2. DFT Calculations
Starting geometries for compounds 1 and 2 were extracted from the X-ray crystallographic data
and fully optimized without symmetry constraints by means of the density functional theory method
DFT) [54], employing the B3LYP functional [55] and the 6-31+G** basis set [56]. The calculations
(
were performed in the gas phase, with an ultrafine integration grid, employing the Gaussian 09
code [57]. To make a detailed assignation of the infrared spectra, the calculated vibrational modes
were characterized by means of the potential energy distribution (PED) with the program VEDA 4 [58].
The computed vibrational frequencies were scaled using a factor of 0.964 [59].
To model the electronic spectra in methanol, the X-ray crystallographic structures of both
molecules were pre-optimized in solution by molecular mechanics, employing the MMFF94X forcefield
3
(
energy gradient = 0.01 kcal/mol/Å ), as implemented in MOE [60]. The solvent was modeled by
means of the Generalized Born model (ε = 33.1). To explore the conformational space, a search on
the potential energy surface was carried out with the LowModeMD method [61] using the same
3
forcefield and solvation method, without cut-offs, and with a RMS gradient = 0.005 kcal/mol/Å
(
rejection limit = 100; RMSD limit = 0.25 Å; energy window = 7 kcal/mol; iteration limit = 10,000).
The number of conformations found were 4 for and 16 for . Then, the most stable conformers
were re-optimized in solution by DFT (B3LYP/6-31+G**). The influence of the solvent was simulated
1
2