to the latter, OGA tolerates inhibitor groups larger than
acetamido -CH3, or its equivalent, in the acetamido binding
pocket and thus provides an avenue for potential optimization
of inhibitor selectivity, efficacy, solubility, transport, and
metabolic stability. GlcNAc-thiazoline8 (2, Figure 1) is a
The GlcNAc-thiazoline triacetate 8 is available on a
multigram scale by treatment of commercial glucosamine
pentaacetate 7 with P4S10 (Scheme 1).17 Whereas 2 binds in
Scheme 1. Tautomeric Deuteration of GlcNAc-Thiazoline
Figure 2. ORTEP view of one cation of the salt 8‚HO3SAr (Ar )
2,4-dinitrophenyl), showing the OS2 pyranose conformation.
nanomolar but nonselective inhibitor of OGA, HexA,9 and
HexB by virtue of its resemblence to the transition state
leading to the enzyme intermediate, oxazolinium ion 1.10 By
increasing the size of the thiazoline ring substituent from
methyl to ethyl, propyl, and isopropyl, Vocadlo and co-
workers were able to increase the selectivity for inhibition
of OGA (see 3-5).11,12 Analogous steric-based selectivity
improvements to other OGA inhibitors have also been
realized.13-15 On the other hand, inhibitors that possess
functionalized acetamido mimics could provide an expanded
array of options for biochemical and medicinal chemistry
studies.16 We have now prepared a new series of methyl-
modified GlcNAc-thiazolines 6 by exploiting the previously
unrecognized propensity of GlcNAc-thiazolines to undergo
buffer- and acylation-induced imine-to-enamine conversion.
enzyme active sites in an apparent pseudo-chair (4C1)
pyranose conformation,18,19 GlcNAc-thiazoline triacetates
such as 8 exist principally in a twist boat (OS2) in CDCl3
solution.20 In the solid state, the 2,4-dinitrobenzenesulfonic
acid salt of 8 also exhibits the S2 pyranose conformation
(Figure 2). The corresponding thiazoline triols (e.g., 2) are
closer to a boat (O,4B) in CD3OD solution.21
The methyl protons of 8 exchange with deuterium in
certain solvents in the presence of acid. As this reaction could
also be used to prepare tritiated 2, the deuteration was
optimized as follows. Treatment of 8 with 2.4 equiv of
pyridine, 1.2 equiv of triflic acid, and 100 equiv of D2O in
acetonitrile solution for 8 h at 23 °C and then extractive
workup gave the trideuterated GlcNAc-thiazoline 10. No
C-deuteration was detected in the absence of the buffer
components pyridine and triflic acid. Standard deacetylation
then led to the corresponding triol 11 without significant loss
of deuterium, according to integration of the methyl signal
in the 1H NMR spectrum. Alternatively, triol 2 was directly
trideuterated by treatment with the same buffer system, and
11 was separated from the buffer components by partitioning
between 1-butanol and saturated aqueous sodium bicarbonate
(93% yield, 95% D3). In polar solvents at acidic pH, 8
O
(8) Systematic name: (3aR,5R,6S,7R,7aR)-6,7-dihydroxy-5-hydroxy-
methyl-2-methyl-5,6,7,7a-tetrahydro-3aH-pyrano[3,2-d]thiazole.
(9) GlcNAc-thiazoline 2 has also been identified as a chemical chaperone
that may prevent misfolding of a HexA mutant associated with Tay-Sachs
disease. Tropak, M. B.; Reid, S. P.; Guiral, M.; Withers, S. G.; Mahuran,
D. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 13478-13487.
(10) Whitworth, G. E.; Macauley, M. S.; Stubbs, K. A.; Dennis, R. J.;
Taylor, E. J.; Davies, G. J.; Greig, I. R.; Vocadlo, D. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2007, 129, 635-644. Knapp, S.; Vocadlo, D.; Gao, Z.; Kirk, B., Lou, J.;
Withers, S. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 6804-6805.
(11) Macouley, M. S.; Whitworth, G. E.; Debowski, A. W.; Chen, D.;
Vocadlo, D. J. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 25313-25322.
(12) Stubbs, K. A.; Zhang, N.; Vocadlo, D. J. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2006,
4, 839-845.
(13) Dorfmueller, H. C.; Borodkin, V. S.; Schimpl, M.; Shepherd, S.
M.; Shpiro, N. A.; van Aalten, D. M. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128,
16484-16485.
(17) Knapp, S.; Kuhn, R. A.; Amorelli, B. Org. Synth. 2007, 84, 68-
76.
(18) Dennis, R. J; Taylor. E. J.; Macauley, M. S.; Stubbs, K. A.;
Turckenburg, J. P.; Hart, S. J.; Black, G. N.; Vocadlo, D. J.; Davies, G. J.
Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2006, 13, 365-371.
(14) Kim, E. J.; Perreira, M.; Thomas, C. J.; Hanover, J. A. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2006, 128, 4234-4235.
(15) Additional recent OGA inhibitors: Shanmugasundaram, B.; De-
bowski, A. W.; Dennis, R. J.; Davies, G. J.; Vocadlo, D. J.; Vasella, A.
Chem. Commun. 2006, 4372-4374. Tolman, C.; Paterson, A. J.; Shin, R.;
Kudlow, J. E. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2006, 340, 526-534. Lee,
T. N.; Alborn, W. E.; Knierman, M. D.; Konrad, R. J. Biochem. Biophys.
Res. Commun. 2006, 350, 1038-1043. Rao, F. V.; Dorfmueller, H. C.;
Villa, F.; Allwood, M.; Eggleston, I. M.; van Aalten, D. M. F. EMBO J.
2006, 25, 1569-1578. Perreira, M.; Kim, E. J.; Thomas, C. J.; Hanover, J.
A. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2006, 14, 837-846.
(19) Lemieux, M. J.; Mark, B. L.; Cherney, M. M.; Withers, S. G.;
Mahuran, D. J.; James, M. N. G. J. Mol. Biol. 2006, 359, 913-929. Mark,
B. L.; Mahuran, D. J.; Cherney, M. M.; Zhao, D.; Knapp, S.; James, M. N.
G. J. Mol. Biol. 2003, 327, 1093-1109. Mark, B. L.; Vocadlo, D. J.; Knapp,
S.; Triggs-Raine, B. L.; Withers, S. G.; James, M. N. G. J. Biol. Chem.
2001, 276, 10330-10337.
(20) Vicinal proton coupling constants for 8: J1,2 ) 7, J2,3 ) 3, J3,4
)
1.5, and J4,5 ) 9 Hz. See also: Foces-Foces, C.; Cano, F. H.; Bernabe, M.;
Penades, S.; Martin-Lomas, M. Carbohydr. Res. 1984, 135, 1-11.
(21) Coupling constants for 2: J1,2 ) 7, J2,3 ) J3,4 ) 4, and J4,5 ) 9 Hz.
(16) Ritter, T. K.; Wong, C.-H. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 615-618.
2322
Org. Lett., Vol. 9, No. 12, 2007