Compounds 2r and 2s with N,N-diphenyl and N-benzyl
substituent displayed to be able to decrease the ear edema in
mice, by 86.3% and 77.4%, respectively. (5) It is worth
mentioning that the presence of no substituent on the phenyl ring
compound 2a showed the best anti-inflammatory activity, for this
This work was supported by Zhejiang Province Public
Technology Application Project (No. 2017C33131) and the
Science and Technology Program Project of Zhoushan City of
China (No. 2015C41015).
reason, it was difficult to determine
a structure-activity
relationship for the different substituent group attached to phenyl
ring.
The analgesic effect of the synthesized derivatives 2a-2s
1. Abdellatif, K.R.A.; Fadaly, W.A.A.; Azouz, A.A. Arch.
Pharm. Chem. Life Sci. 2016, 349, 801-807.
was evaluated in mice using the hot plate technique at 60 min
o
after intraperitoneal injection at 58
indomethacin as reference drugs.
C
comparable to
All compounds exhibited
2. Wallace, J.L.; McCafferty, D.M.; Carter, L.; McKnight, W.;
Argentieri, D. Gastroenterology 1993, 105, 1630.
3. Uchóa, F.T.; Silva, T.G.; Lima, M.C.A.; Galdino, S.L.; Pitta,
I.R.; Costa, T.D. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2009, 61, 339.
4. Pontiki, E. D.; Litina, H.; Litinas, K.; Nicolotti, O.; Carotti, A.
Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2011, 46, 191.
5. Abdel-Sayed, M.A.; Bayomi, S.M.; El-Sherbeny, M.A.;
Abdel-Aziz, N.I.; ElTahir, K-E. H.; Shehatou, G.S.G.; Abdel-
Aziz. A.A.-M. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2016, 24, 2032.
6. Smith, W.L.; Garavito, R.M.; DeWitt, D.L. J. Biol. Chem.
1996, 271, 33157.
7. Gouvea, D.P.; Vasconcellos, F.A.; Berwaldt, Gabriele dos A.;
Seixas Neto, A.C. P.; Fischer, G.; Sakata, R.P.; Almeida,
W.P.; Cunico, W. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2016, 118, 259.
8. Jahng, Y. Arch. Pharmacol. Res. 2013, 36, 517.
9. Lee, E.S.; Kim, S.I.; Lee, S.H.; Jeong, T.C.; Moon, T.C.;
Chang, H.W.; Jahng, Y. Bull. Kor. Chem. Soc. 2005, 26,
1975.
10 Abdel-Aziz, A.A.-M.; Abou-Zeid, L.A.; ElTahir, K.E.H.;
Ayyad, R.R.; El-Sayed, M.A.-A.; El-Azab, A.S. Eur. J. Med.
Chem. 2016, 121, 410.
11. Abdelrahman, M.H.; Youssif, B.G.; Abdelgawad,
M.A.; Abdelazeem, A.H.; Ibrahim, H.M.; Moustafa, A.E.;
Treamblu, L.; Bukhari, S.N. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2017, 27,
972.
12. The synthesis of (S)-N,1-diphenyl-3,4-dihydroisoquinoline-
2(1H)-carboxamide (2a): To a flask containing toluene (30
mL) and(S)-ethyl-1-phenyl-3,4-dihydroisoquinoline-2(1H)-
carboxylate (1 mmol, 3g) was heated at 110 °C under reflux
for 2 h. Then, substituted aniline (5 mmol) and NaH (1.6
mmol, 0.4 g) was added, the reaction mixture was heated at
16-18
potent analgesic activity at a dose of 100 mg/kg administered
intraperitoneally with inhibition rate values of 71.7-100 % (Table
1
). Compounds 2a, 2l, 2m and 2n exhibited the excellent
analgesic activity (inhibition rate: 100 %, 99.2%, 100%, 98.7%
and 100 %, respectively), which was nearly equivalent to that of
indomethacin (98.6 %). Moreover, we also found that
compounds 2c, 2f, 2i, 2l and 2p exhibited better analgesic effect
at the m-positions of the phenyl ring not only with electron-
donating substituent (2b-2g) but also with electron-withdrawing
substituent (2h-2m, 2o-2q) on phenyl ring. Interestingly, the
unsubstituted of the phenyl ring compound 2a exhibited the best
analgesic activity, and exhibited the anti-inflammatory effect in a
dose-dependent manner from 10 mg/kg to 30 mg/kg.
Compounds 2a and 2n exhibited the best analgesic and anti-
inflammatory effects were tested for their inhibitory activity
against ovine COX-1 and COX-2 (Table 3). The results displayed
that compounds 2a and 2n are weak inhibitors of COX-1
isozyme but exhibited moderate COX-2 isozyme inhibitory
effects (IC50=0.47 µM and 1.63 µM, respectively) and COX-2
selectivity indexes (SI=11.5 and 4.8). Furthermore, compounds
2
a was more inhibitors of COX-2 isozyme active than the
reference drug celecoxib (IC50 =0.66 µM, SI=9.7). Traditional
NSAIDs possess the anti-inflammatory activity through non-
selective inhibition of both COX-1 and COX-2, such as aspirin,
19,20
indomethacin and ibuprofen.
Bleeding, gastrointestinal
irritation and ulceration side effects of the classical NSAIDs are
due to high COX-1 versus COX-2 selectivity. Therefore, the
development of efficient, new and selective COX-2 inhibitors is
2
1-23
essential in medicinal chemistry approaches.
1
10-120 °C. The reaction was monitored by TLC until the
Table 3. COX-1/COX-2 enzyme inhibition assay in vitro
a
reaction was over. Then the products was added sodium
chloride and extracted with acetic ether (30 mL×2), acetic
ether layer was washed with 10 ml 20 % HCl, then adjusted
pH 10 with 2 mol/L NaOH, the crude product was purified
using 95 % EtOH. Yield: 65 %, mp: 132.1-133.4 °C. IR
b
Compound
COX-1, IC50(µM)
COX-2, IC50(µM) COX-2, SI
2
2
a
5.42
0.47
1
1.5
cm-1
1
p
7.85
6.41
1.63
0.66
(
KBr)
MHz ): δ 2.92-2.97 (2H, t, -CH
.46 (1H, s, -CH), 6.56 (1H, s, -NH), 6.95-7.04 (4H, m, -
C H ), 7.06-7.25 (5H, m, -C H ), 7.30-7.36 (5H, m, -C H ).
: 3280, 1714, 1612, 1249. H-NMR (CDCl
3
, 300
4
.8
.7
2
), 3.75-3.78 (2H, t, -CH
2
),
Celecoxib
9
6
a
IC50 value is the compound concentration required to produce 50%
6
4
6
5
6
5
1
3
inhibition of COX-1 or COX-2 for means of three determinations and
deviation from the mean is <10% of the mean value.
C-NMR (CDCl , 75 MHz): δ 28.51, 40.47, 58.05, 120.03,
3
123.11, 126.53, 127.29, 127.52, 128.22, 128.45, 128.68,
128.86, 134.91, 136.23, 139.05, 142.50, 155.07. ESI-HRMS
b
SI: selectivity index (COX-1 IC50/COX-2 IC50 ).
+
+
20 2
calcd for C22H N O ([M+H] ): 328.4070; found: 328.4079.
A new series of (S)-N-substitued-1-phenyl-3,4-dihydro-
isoquinoline-2(1H)-carboxamide derivatives was synthesized for
evaluation as anti-inflammatory agents and analgesic agents in
vivo. All compounds showed good anti-inflammatory and
analgesic activities in vivo. Compounds 2a and 2n exhibited
better anti-inflammatory and analgesic activities than
indomethacin. In addition, compounds 2a and 2n are weak
inhibitors of COX-1 isozyme but exhibited moderate COX-2
isozyme inhibitory effects. Furthermore, compound 2a was more
inhibitors of COX-2 isozyme active than the reference drug
celecoxib.
13. Zhang, X.W.; Zhao, D.H.; Quan, Y.C.; Sun, L.P.; Yin, X.M.;
Guan, L.P. Med. Chem. Res. 2010, 19, 403.
14. Ohlsson, L. Acta Pharmacol. Toxicol. 1953, 9, 322.
15. Cordeiro, K.W.; Felipe, J.L.; Malange, K.F.; do Prado, P.R.;
de Oliveira Figueiredo, P.; Garcez, F.R.; de Cássia Freitas, K.;
Garcez, W.S.; Toffoli-Kadri, M.C. J. Ethnopharmacol. 183
2016, 183, 128.
16. Leighton, G.; Johnson, M.; Meecham, K.; Hill, R.; Hughes, J.
Br. J. Pharmacol. 1987, 92, 915.
17. Shaaban, O.G.; Rizk, O.H.; Bayad, A.E.; El-Ashmawy, I.M.
Open Med. Chem. J. 2013, 7, 49.