column with a UV detector and a flow rate of 0.5 mL min2 using hexane+i-
1
ring and by the bulkiness of the alkyl group. Chloro- and bromo-
substituted aromatic azirines were reduced in 44 to 58%
enantiomeric excess (Table 2, entries 2–5). Methyl substitution
at the m- and p-positions on the aromatic ring yielded aziridines
with 65 and 72% ee respectively (Table 2, entries 6,7).
Surprisingly, a methoxy substituent in the p-position has a
dramatic negative influence on selectivity and yields the
product as a racemate (Table 2, entry 9). As shown in entry 11,
increased steric hindrance on the aliphatic group inhibits
reduction. This is probably due to lack of flexibility in this type
of azirine. Our attempts to reduce aliphatic azirines have failed.
These substrates proved to be less stable and difficult to
isolate.
PrOH 90+10.
1
A. Mitsunobu, in Comprehensive Organic Synthesis, ed. B. M. Trost
and I. Flemming, 1st edn., Pergamon Press, 1991, vol. 6, ch. 1, p.
6
75.
2
3
D. Tanner, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1994, 33, 599.
H. M. I. Osborn and J. Sweeney, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 1997, 8,
1693; R. S. Atkinson, Tetrahedron, 1999, 55, 1519; E. N. Jacobsen, in
Comprehensive Asymmetric Catalysis, ed. E. N. Jacobsen, A. Pfaltz and
H. Yamamoto, Springer, Hamburg, 1999.
4
R. W. Quan, Z. Li and E. N. Jacobsen, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1996, 118,
8
1
1
156; Z. Li, R. W. Quan and E. N. Jacobsen, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1995,
17, 5889; Z. Li, K. R. Conser and E. N. Jacobsen, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
993, 115, 5326; D. A. Evans, M. M. Faul, M. T. Bilodeau, B. A.
Andersson and D. M. Barnes, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1993, 115, 5328; C. J.
Sanders, K. M. Gillespie, D. Bell and P. Scott, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000,
In agreement with the Noyori mechanism, preliminary
mechanistic experiments indicate that a N–H moiety in the
ligand is necessary for reduction. Alkylation of the nitrogen
1
22, 7132; C. Loncaric and W. D. Wulff, Org. Lett., 2001, 3, 3675; J. C.
Antilla and W. D. Wulff, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 2000, 39,
(
Me) on 3 inhibits reaction. This suggests that a mechanism
involving a concerted addition of a proton and a hydride from
4518.
the catalyst is operating, as is the case in the asymmetric transfer
5 F. Palacios, A. M. O. de Retana, E. M. de Marigorta and J. M. de los
hydrogenation of aromatic ketones.13
Santos, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2001, 2401.
6
A. G. Hortmann, D. A. Robertson and B. K. Gilliard, J. Org. Chem.,
972, 37, 322; W. K. Anderson and A. S. Milowsky, J. Med. Chem.,
986, 29, 2241.
T. Ohkuma, M. Kitamura and R. Noyori, in Catalytic Asymmetric
Synthesis, ed. I. Ojima, Wiley-VCH, 2000, pp. 83–95.
For reviews see: R. Noyori and S. Hashiguchi, Acc. Chem. Res., 1997,
30, 97; M. J. Palmer and M. Wills, Tetrahedron: Asymmetry, 1999, 10,
2045; G. Zassinovich, G. Mestroni and S. Gladiali, Chem. Rev., 1992,
92, 1051.
In conclusion, chiral aromatic aziridines can be obtained
from the asymmetric transfer hydrogenation of azirines. Azirine
1
1
1
is reduced with 70% enantiomeric excess which is comparable
7
8
4
to the stereoselectivity reported for aziridination of styrene.
Other methods to reduce 2H-azirines are currently under
investigation.
We thank the Swedish Natural Science Research Council
NFR), the Swedish Research Council for Engineering Science
TFR) and the Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research for
(
(
9
R. Noyori and T. Ohkuma, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2001, 40, 40.
1
1
0 S. Hashiguchi, A. Fujii, J. Takehara, T. Ikariya and R. Noyori, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1995, 117, 7562; Y. Jiang, Q. Jiang and X. Zhang, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1998, 120, 3817; Y. Nishibayashi, I. Takei, S. Uemura and
M. Hidai, Organometallics, 1999, 18, 2291; M. Palmer, T. Walsgrove
and M. Wills, J. Org. Chem., 1997, 62, 5226.
generous financial support. Christian Hedberg is thanked for
preparing ligand 3 and Erik Risberg is also acknowledged for
his assistance.
1 N. Uematsu, A. Fujii, S. Hashiguchi, T. Ikariya and R. Noyori, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1996, 118, 4916.
Notes and references
†
A typical procedure: to a dry 25 mL Schlenk flask equipped with a
magnetic stirrer and Ar atmosphere, were added [RuCl (p-cymene)] (2.5
mmol, 1.53 mg) and amino alcohol 3 (20 mmol, 4.27 mg) followed by 2 mL
of i-PrOH (freshly distilled over CaH ). The reaction mixture was stirred for
5 min at rt and another 6 mL of i-PrOH was added followed by i-PrOK (25
12 J. M. Nordin, P. Roth, T. Tarnai, D. A. Alonso, P. Brandt and P. G.
Andersson, Chem. Eur. J., 2001, 7, 1431.
2
2
13 R. Noyori, M. Yamakawa and S. Hashiguchi, J. Org. Chem., 2001, 24,
7931; D. A. Alonso, P. Brandt, S. J. M. Nordin and P. G. Andersson, J.
Am. Chem. Soc., 1999, 121, 9580; M. Yamakawa, H. Ito and R. Noyori,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000, 122, 1466; D. G. I. Pera, J. N. H. Reek, J-W.
Handgraaf, E. J. Meijer, P. Dierkes. P. C. J. Kamer, J. Brusse, H. E.
Shoemaker and P. W. N. W van Leeuwen, Chem. Eur. J., 2000, 6, 2818;
M. Yamakawa, I. Yamada and R. Noyori, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2001,
40, 2818.
2
1
mmol, 25 mL, 1 M solution in i-PrOH). The substrate (1.0 mmol) in 2 mL of
i-PrOH was added dropwise and the reaction was followed by TLC. The
reaction was quenched by the addition of 2 drops of water and the solvent
removed by distillation. The red oil was filtered through a short plug of SiO
1 g) with pentane–Et O. The ee was determined on a Chiralcel OD-H
2
(
2
CHEM. COMMUN., 2002, 1752–1753
1753