Fluorescence Quenching and Heterodimerization
J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 121, No. 41, 1999 9541
diethylisophthalate (1.6 g, 6.4 mmol) and pyrrole (470 µL, 0.42 g, 6.4
mmol) were added, and the solution was stirred at room temperature
under a slow stream of nitrogen. After 15 min, BF3 etherate (0.34 mL
in 10 mL of dichloromethane) was added and the reaction vessel was
kept in the dark. When 1.18 g of p-chloranil was added to the reaction
mixture after 1 h, the color of the mixture turned to deep violet. After
standing for another 30 min, the solution was concentrated to 20 mL
by rotary evaporation and 10 g of silica was added. The slurry was
dried to afford a dark powder that was poured onto the top of a
chromatography column of silica. The column was washed with a
mixture of dichloromethane/ethyl acetate (3:1). After the first yellow
fraction was disgarded, the major red fraction was again chromato-
graphed with the same solvent mixture (10:1). The violet fraction from
hexane/ethyl acetate was crystallized. Yield 0.5 g (0.42 mmol, 26%).
1H NMR (250 MHz, CDCl3) δ 9.25 (4H, s, Ph), 9.05 (8H, s, Ph), 8.60
(8H, s, pyrrole), 4.45 (16H, q, CH2), 1.25 (24H, t, CH3), -2.80 (2H, s,
NH). MS (EI) m/z ) 1190 (35%, [M]+) Anal. calcd for C68H62N4O16
(1190,74): C, 68.53; H, 5.24; N, 4.70. Found: C, 68.10; H, 5.44; N,
4.44.
meso-5,10,15,20-Tetrakis-(3,5-dicarboxylatophenyl)porphyrin, 1.
A mixture of 0.3 g (4.2 × 10-4 M) of (meso-Tetrakis-(3,5-diethoxy-
carbonylphenyl)porphyrin), 2.0 g of potassium hydroxide, 10 mL of
water, and 100 mL of methanol was refluxed for 6 h. The reaction
mixture was acidified to pH 1 with HCl, and the precipitate was filtered
off. 1 (0.4 g) as a dark green solid was obtained: MS (FAB-) m/z )
966 (1%, [M-]). UV-Vis (H2O, pH ) 12), λmax nm (ꢀ M-1 cm-1) )
414 (446200), 516 (18600), 553 (1200), 580 (800).
meso-5,10,15,20-Tetrakis-4-(2-pyridyl)phenylporphin. p-2-Py-
ridylbenzyldehyde12 (2.3 g, 12.5 mmol) was dissolved in 60 mL of
propionic acid, and 0.83 g (12.5 mmol) pyrrole was added. After being
refluxed for 1 h, the solvent was evaporated and the residue washed
with DMF: 0.65 g (0.71 mmol; 23%) purple crystals were obtained.
1H NMR (250 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.95 (8Η, s, Por), 8.8 (4H, d, Py), 8.4
(16H, m, Phe), 8.1 (4H, d, Py), 7.9 (4H, dd, Py), 7.4 (4H, dd, Py),
-2.65 (2H, s, Por).
meso-5,10,15,20-Tetrakis(2-pyridyl-5-phenyl)porphyrinatoman-
ganese(III) acetate. Tetrakis(2-pyridyl-4-phenyl)porphin and 88 mg
manganese(II)acetate (230 mg, 0.25 mmol) (36 mmol) was dissolved
in 50 mL of pyridine and refluxed for 4 h. The solvent was then
removed by evaporation, and the crude product was chromatographed
with chloroform/methanol (9:1) on a column of neutral alumina. Yield
150 mg (0.14 mmol, 58%) dark solid. MS (EI) m/z ) 975 (100%,
[M-acetate]+).
an average molecular weight of 8500-11000. The spin coating was
not dried. Porphyrin 1 was first transformed into the corresponding
acid chloride by treatment with SOCl2 at 60 °C for 50 min in order to
provide a solvent-soluble porphyrin, which would decompose to the
acid on the wet surface and bind as ammonium salt. Water could not
be used for self-assembly because PAA would have been solubilized.
The moist PAA-coated glass plate was then immersed into the
dichloromethane solution of the ocataacid chlorite ov 1 for 20 min.
The plate was then washed carefully with dichloromethane, and the
noncoated side was wiped off with a tissue.
Fluorescence Measurements. Steady-state fluorescence of porphyrin
monolayers on gold was determined with a cooled CCD matrix with a
mounted spectrometer (Oriel L. O. T. Instaspec IV). The sample was
oriented on a 5-axis positioning system (Fostec DC 300). Excitation
occurred by an Ar+ laser (100 mW, 30 µm spot size on sample) at
514.5 nm under an incident angle of 45°. Emitted light was collected
perpendicular to the gold electrode surface. Further details are described
in ref 13.
Quenching Experiments. The prepared electrodes were first placed
in a quartz cuvette (20 mL) filled with 10 mL of aqueous potassium
hydroxide (pH 12). A 10-4 M aqueous solution (100 µL) of quencher
2 was then added. For the quenching experiments with porphyrin 4,
larger quantities, namely, 30, 50, and 100 µL, of an aqueous 10-4
M
solution of 4 was added. No fluorescence quenching was observed
(Figure 3). In a control experiment, 2 × 100 µL of porphyrin 2 was
added and quantitative fluorescence quenching occurred. In the case
of the octadecanethiol membrane, 100 µL of the quencher 4 (10-4 M)
was added in the same manner.
The Monte Carlo Simulation. The calculations were performed
using Mathematica 3.0 (Wolfram Research, Inc.).
Cyclic Voltammetry. Voltammograms (CVs) were recorded ex situ
in an aqueous solution of 1 M KCl and 1 × 10-3 M K3[Fe(CN)6]. A
three electrode potentiostat (Versastat, EG & G, Princeton, NJ) was
used. The circular gold electrode with the membrane sample had a
surface area of 0.5 cm2, platinum wire was used as counter electrode,
and an SCE electrode was used as reference. Several sweeps were taken
with each sample. Selected closed sweeps are shown in Figure 5b. The
membrane-coated electrodes were treated with 0,1 M cis- and trans-
cyclohexanediol solutions for 24 h and then splashed with water. The
electrodes covered with a monolayer of porphyrin 1 (see SAM
procedure) showed no change for the CV curve of ferricyanide as
compared to the naked electrode.
Results
meso-5,10,15,20-Tetrakis(1-methyl-2-pyridinium-yl-5-phenyl)por-
phyrinato-manganese(III) pentakis(trifluoromethanosulfonate) 4.
Tetrakis(2-pyridyl-4-phenyl)porphyrinatomanganese(III) acetate (100
mg, 0.1 mmol) was dissolved in 10 mL of DMF, and 0.13 g of methyl
trifluoromethanesulfonate was added at 0 °C via syringe. The mixture
was stirred at room temperature for 1 h, and the solution was cooled
overnight to -18 °C, filtered, and washed with cold water. Yield 140
mg of black solid (80%). UV-Vis (H2O, pH ) 2), λ max nm (ꢀ M-1
cm-1) 380 (37000), 401 (36000), 468 (92000), 513 (4900), 564 (8100),
597 (6100); MS (FAB+) m/z ) 990 (0.36%; [M-3CH3]+).
For a porphyrin lying flat on a gold surface, one may expect
total fluorescence quenching because efficient energy transfer
from the excited dye to the metal surface has been reported for
other dyes on metal surfaces.13 Enhanced fluorescence has,
however, also been observed for dyes adsorbed on rough metal
surfaces,14-17 where the enhancement of fluorescence is due to
the increased local fields near the rough surface. The quenching
by energy-transfer processes is more than overcompensated at
frequencies near the plasma resonance frequency and at an
appropriate distance between dye and surface. Only experiments
could tell whether we could apply a fluorescence test for the
characterization of membrane gaps.
UV/Vis Spectroscopy on Gold Surfaces. UV/Vis absorption spectra
on gold subphases were measured with a Lambda 16 spectrometer
connected with a light conductor.
SAM Procedures. Glass plates (2.5 × 1.5 cm) with depositions of
first a 20 Å layer of chromium and then 200 nm of polycrystalline
gold were used for UV/vis and fluorescence measurements. The gold
electrodes were at first cleaned with piranha solution for 10 s and then
rinsed with water. Afterward they were exposed to a 1 mM solution of
porphyrin 1 at pH 12. After 4 days the electrodes were rinsed with
aqueous sodium hydroxide solution (pH 12) and finally with neutral
water. The dried gold electrodes covered with 1 as described above
were immersed in a 10-3 M solution of the mercaptodiamide 3 in
dichloromethane or ethanol for 24 h. They were washed twice with
ethanol. The same procedure was also followed with octadecythiol
(ODT) instead of the mercaptoamide 3.
We used the meta-tetraphenyl-octacarboxylate-porphyrin18,19
1 for the formation of a porphyrin monolayer adsorbed from
water at pH 12 on gold surfaces. The monolayer luminescence
was investigated using an Ar+ (514 nm) laser for excitation.20
(14) Naujok, R. R.; Duevel, R. V.; Corn, R. M. Langmuir 1993, 9, 1771.
(15) Pope, J. M.; Tan, Z.; Kimbrell, S.; Buttry, D. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1992, 114, 10085.
(16) Wokaun, A.; Lutz, H.-P.; King, A. P.; Wild, U. P.; Ernst, R. R. J.
Chem. Phys. 1985, 79, 509.
(17) Alivisatos, A. P.; Waldeck, D. H.; Jarris, C. B. J. Chem. Phys. 1985,
82, 541.
(18) Niedballa, U.; Gries, H.; Conrad, J.; Hofmann, S.; Weinmann, H.-
J.; Speck, U. German Patent DE 3809671 A1, 1989.
(19) Patel, B. R.; Suslick, K. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 11802.
Adsorption of Porphyrin 1 on PAA Coated Glass Slides. Thin
films from polyallylamin hydrochloride (PAA) were produced by spin
coating of a 2% aqueous solution of PAA (Aldrich Chem. comp.) with