Y.-R. Xi, X.-K. Chen, Y.-T. Wang et al.
Journal of Molecular Structure 1243 (2021) 130893
Scheme 1. the preparation procedure of compounds 1–3.
of a set of compounds based on 4-amino-4H-1,2,4-triazole group,
cyanobenzoic acid. Yield: 0.686 g, 48.3%. M.p. 212–215 °C. Ele-
mental analysis calcd (%) for C14 H16 N6O (284.33): C, 63.14; H,
5.30; N, 31.56; Found: C, 63.28; H, 5.31; N, 31.50. 1H NMR
ꢀ
namely, 4,4 -(4-amino-4H-1,2,4-triazole-3,5-diyl)dibenzoic acid
ꢀ
ꢀ
(1), 4,4 -(4-amino-4H-1,2,4-triazole-3,5-diyl)dianiline (2), and 4,4 -
(4-amino-4H-1,2,4-triazole-3,5-diyl)diphenol (3), were obtained
through reacting different aromatic nitrile and hydrazine under the
solvothermal conditions, respectively (Scheme 1). The spectra of
FT-IR, UV–Vis, 1H NMR and 13C NMR for 1–3 were studied. Addi-
tionally, the crystal structures of 1–3 have been discussed, and its
fluorescence properties and thermal behaviors were investigated
in details. As we expected, the substituted groups can affect the
luminescent properties of these compounds with amino-triazole
functions, which can be further confirmed by the Hirshfeld surface
analyses.
(400 MHz, DMSO–d6) δ 7.67 (d,
J
=
8.2 Hz, 4H), 6.65 (d,
J = 8.2 Hz, 4H), 5.95 (s, 2H), 5.44 (s, 4H). 13C NMR (101 MHz,
DMSO–d6) δ 154.40, 150.26, 129.56, 115.12, 113.65. IR (KBr, cm–1):
3386(s), 3327(m), 3273(m), 3157(m), 2428(w), 2148(w), 2029(w),
1959(m), 1909(w), 1730(w), 1647(w), 1614(s), 1496(s), 1477(s),
1423(w), 1385(s), 1275(m), 1115(s), 1014(m), 908(w), 837(m),
810(m), 739(w), 694(m), 617(s), 571(m), 532(w), 471(w), 428(w).
2.3. The synthesis of compound 3 (4OH)
The preparation of compound
3 was similar to that of
compound 1 when 4-hydroxyobenzonitrile took place of 4-
2. Experimental
cyanobenzoic acid. Yield: 0.958 g, 71.4%. M.p. 290–292 °C. Elemen-
tal analysis calcd (%) for C14 H12N4O2 (268.28): C, 62.68; H, 4.51;
N, 20.88; Found: C, 62.79; H, 4.50; N, 20.82. 1H NMR (400 MHz,
DMSO–d6) δ 9.88 (s, 2H), 7.84 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 4H), 6.90 (d,
J = 8.5 Hz, 4H), 6.69 (s, 2H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO–d6)
δ 159.02, 154.30, 130.48, 130.20, 118.67, 115.94, 115.67. IR (KBr,
cm–1): 3476(br), 3416(w), 3223(w), 2809(w), 2678(w), 2509(w),
2362(w), 1915(w), 1772(m), 1613(s), 1481(s), 1363(w), 1236(s),
1173(s), 1108(s), 979(m), 902(w), 842(s), 744(w), 671(w), 598(m),
534(s), 453(w).
2.1. Materials and measurements
Reagents and solvents were commercially available and not fur-
ther purified. C, H and N microanalyses were carried out with a
Perkin–Elmer 240 elemental analyzer. Thermogravimetric analysis
(TGA) data were collected with a TA SDT Q600 analyzer in N2 at
a heating rate of 10 °C min–1 in the range of 10–600 °C. The FT–
IR spectra were recorded from KBr pellets in the range 400–4000
cm–1 on a Bruker Tensor4 spectrometer. UV–Vis absorption spec-
tra were recorded on a SHIMADZU UV–2600 spectrophotometer
with 0.1 nm resolution. The solution/solid–state fluorescence spec-
tra were recorded on a HITACHI–4500 spectrometer at room tem-
perature.
2.4. Single-crystal structure determination
Single-crystal structures of compounds 1–3 were measured by
a Bruker Smart CCD equipped with graphite–monochromator Mo
˚
Kα radiation (λ = 0.71073 A). The lattice parameters were ob-
2.2. The synthesis of compound 1 (4CA)
tained by a least-squares refinement of the diffraction data. All
the measured independent reflections were used in the structural
analysis, and semi-empirical absorption corrections were applied
using the SADBASE program [45]. The program SAINT was used
for integration of the diffraction profiles [46]. The structure was
solved by direct methods using the SHELXS and OLEX2 program of
the SHELXTL package and refined with SHELXL [47-49]. All non-
hydrogen atoms were located in successive difference Fourier syn-
theses. The final refinement was performed by full-matrix least-
squares methods with anisotropic thermal parameters for all the
non-hydrogen atoms based on F2. The hydrogen atoms were placed
in the calculated sites and included in the final refinement in the
riding model approximation with displacement parameters derived
from the parent atoms to which they were bonded. Special com-
putations for the crystal structure discussions were carried out
with PLATON for Windows [50]. A summary of the crystallographic
data and structure refinements are listed in Table 1. Selected bond
lengths and bond angles are summarized in Tables 2. Correspond-
ing hydrogen bond and packing interactions data for compounds
1–3 are listed in Tables 3 and 4, respectively.
To a mixture solution of ethylene glycol (10 mL) and 85% hy-
drazine hydrate (3.8 mL, 60 mmoL), 4-cyanobenzoic acid (1.470 g,
10 mmoL) were heated at 130 °C for 3 days in a 15 ml Teflon-
lined vessel container. The reacti−on mixture was cooled to room
temperature at a rate of 5 °C h
1. After cooling to room tem-
perature, pure water (30 ml) was poured to the mixture solution
and it was added adjusted to pH 3 by the concentrated HCl so-
lution. Subsequently, the mixture was cooled to room tempera-
ture. Finally, the earthy yellow crystals were collected by vacuum
filtration. Yield (62.5%, 1.013 g). M.p. >300 °C. Elemental analy-
sis calcd (%) for C16 H12N4O4 (324.30): C, 59.26; H, 3.73; N, 17.28;
found: C, 59.42; H, 3.72; N, 17.33. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO–
d6) δ: 13.10 (s, 2H), 8.19 (d, J = 8 Hz, 4H), 8.09 (d, J = 8 Hz,
4H), 6.41 (s, 2H). 13C NMR (100 MHz, DMSO–d6) δ: 166.83,
153.86, 131.57, 130.94, 129.32, 128.37. IR (KBr, cm−1): 3362(m),
3277(w), 3211(w), 2366(w), 1946(w), 1628(m), 1570(m), 1541(m),
1392(m), 1290(m), 1188(m), 1113(m), 1018(m), 966(m), 912(w),
866(m), 783(m), 717(s), 536(m).
2.3. The synthesis of 2 (4NH2)
2.5. Hirshfeld surface analyses
The synthesis procedure of compound 2 was similar to that
of compound 1 when the 4-aminobenzonitrile took place of 4-
The Hirshfeld surface analyses were calculated by the program
2