1,4-diarylbutane 17 was produced in 77% isolated yield for
the two-step protocol as a 97:3 diastereomeric ratio of
isomers. Diastereofacial selectivity can be explained using
a standard A1,3 strain argument, which has precedent in our
work11 and in the work of others.16 At the stage of 17, the
key issue remaining is formation of the biaryl bond and the
accompanying question of atropdiastereoselection.
Installation of the aryl bromide for biaryl coupling was
accomplished in 84% overall yield for the three-step reaction
sequence: (1) hydrogenolysis of the benzyl ether of 17
(EtOAc, 6 h, 25 °C, 98%) afforded phenol 18; (2) selective
bromination ortho to the phenolic hydroxyl group of 18 (15
°C, 12 h, 90%) provided bromide 19; (3) alkylation of the
phenolic hydroxyl group (K2CO3, acetone, 95%) afforded
methyl ether 20 (Scheme 5). It is well established that
bromination can be selectively achieved ortho to a phenolic
hydroxyl group.17
lithiated system, which was reacted directly with cuprous
cyanide at -40 °C to form an intermediate cyclic, higher-
order biarylcuprate. Oxidation occurred smoothly using
oxygen, as originally described, or more effectively using
1,3-dinitrobenzene,20 and dibenzocyclooctadiene 21 was
isolated in 69% yield as the sole diastereomer present.
Removal of the silyl ether of 21 (THF, 55 °C, 12 h) afforded
the corresponding alcohol 22.
Assignment of absolute configuration about the biaryl axis
of 21 was obtained by correlation of key 1H NMR chemical
shifts with those of the related system 23,21 whose relative
configuration was determined by single-crystal X-ray crystal-
lographic analysis (Figure 1). In the structure of 23, the Paxial
Scheme 5
Figure 1. X-ray Structure of dibenzocyclooctadiene (P)-23.
configuration about the stereogenic biaryl bond correlates
with the 6S,7S,8S configuration at the stereogenic centers
of the four-carbon bridge.
These C6, C7, and C8 stereogenic centers of precursor
20 therefore control the sense of axial chirality during the
formation of the biaryl bond, such that this stereogenic axis
is introduced with a high degree of selectivity. We observed
that oxidative cuprate coupling of the corresponding 1,2-
syn/2,3-anti diastereomer of 1,4-diarylbutane 20 afforded a
3:2 mixture of configurationally undefined stereoisomers.
Alcohol 22 underwent a Mitsunobu reaction/inversion with
benzoic acid (Scheme 6) to afford interiotherin A (1). In a
similar manner, reaction of alcohol 22 with angelic acid
under Mitsunobu reaction conditions afforded angeloylgo-
Implementation of the Lipshutz methodology for biaryl
coupling,18 which involves oxidation of a mixed biarylcuprate
species to effect formation the carbon-carbon biaryl bond,
proved ideal in this system. This reaction is insensitive to
steric or electronic features of aromatic systems, and we have
successfully used it with other sterically crowded, electron-
rich aromatic systems.11,19
In the present case (Scheme 5), halogen-lithium exchange
of 20 with tert-butyllithium afforded an intermediate bis-
1
misin R (2). The H and 13C NMR data for synthetic 1 and
2 were identical with those reported for the naturally
occurring compounds.
As it turned out, our concerns about the regioselectivity
of bromination (Scheme 5) were unwarranted. Suzuki-
Miyaura coupling of borane 16 with the methoxy-substituted
aryl bromide 2422 occurred smoothly to afford 1,4-diarylbu-
(16) (a) Hoffmann, R. W.; Dahmann, G.; Andersen, M. W. Synthesis
1984, 629. (b) Coutts, L. D.; Cywin, C. L.; Kallmerten, J. Synlett 1993,
696. (c) Bernsmann, H.; Fro¨lich, R.; Metz, P. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41,
4347. (d) Araki, K.; Suenaga, K.; Sengoku, T.; Uemura, D. Tetrahedron
2002, 58, 1983. (e) Herb, C.; Maier, M. E. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 8129.
(17) (a) Fujisaki, S.; Eguchi, H.; Omura, A.; Okamoto, A.; Nishida, A.
Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1993, 66, 1576. (b) Pearson, D. E.; Wysong, R. D.;
Breder, C. V. J. Org. Chem. 1967, 32, 2358.
(18) (a) Lipshutz, B. H.; Siegmann, K.; Garcia, E. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1991, 113, 8161. (b) Lipshutz, B. H.; Siegmann, K.; Garcia, E.; Kayser, F.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 9276. (c) Lipshutz, B. H.; Kayser, F.; Maullin,
N. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 815. (d) Lipshutz, B. H.; Liu, Z.-P.; Kayser,
F. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 5567. (e) Lipshutz, B. H.; Kayser, F.; Liu,
Z.-P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1994, 33, 1842.
(20) (a) Spring, D. R.; Krishnan, S.; Schreiber, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2000, 122, 5656. (b) Ref 18b.
(21) Characteristic chemical shifts for (P)-23: C4-H/C10-H δ 7.02/
6.50; C6-H δ 4.42; C7-CH3/C8-CH3 δ 1.03/0.66. For (M)-23: C4-H/
C10-H δ 6.47/6.36; C6-H δ 4.73; C7-CH3/C8-CH3 δ 1.17/0.97. For
compound 21: C4-H/C10-H δ 6.87/6.43; C6-H δ 4.37; C7-CH3/C8-
CH3 δ 0.98/0.65.
(19) Coleman, R. S.; Grant, E. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 8795.
Coleman, R. S.; Grant, E. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 10889.
Org. Lett., Vol. 7, No. 9, 2005
1851