8444
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 8444-8445
A New Approach to Enantiocontrol and
Enantioselectivity Amplification: Chiral Relay in
Diels-Alder Reactions
Mukund P. Sibi,* Lakshmanan Venkatraman, Mei Liu, and
Craig P. Jasperse
Department of Chemistry
North Dakota State UniVersity
Fargo, North Dakota 58105-5516
Figure 1.
is effective, the chiral ligand is only required to bias the
conformation of the N(1) substituent, which in turn controls face
selectivity; the ligand itself need not shield the reaction center.
But any inherent bias of the chiral Lewis acid could be either
consonant or dissonant with the relay group. Consonant chiral
relay would be an attractive approach to amplify selectivity.
To examine if our chiral relay design is operative, Diels-Alder
cycloaddition of cyclopentadiene to crotonates was undertaken
2
using Cu(OTf) /bisoxazolines as the chiral Lewis acid (eq 1).
The reaction choice was based on two key factors: (1) the well-
established square planar-like geometry for Cu(II) complexes with
bisoxazoline ligands and bidentate substrates and (2) literature
ReceiVed June 12, 2001
ReVised Manuscript ReceiVed July 5, 2001
Development of new strategies to access enantiomerically pure
1
compounds is at the forefront of synthetic organic chemistry. In
this context, chiral Lewis acid catalysis has emerged as one of
the premiere methods to control stereochemistry. Much effort has
8
gone into the design of superior ligands with increased steric
extension, to shield distant reactive sites.2 We have instead
considered a “chiral relay” approach, focusing on the improved
design of achiral templates which may indirectly relay and amplify
stereoselectivity from ligands, including ligands with minimal
steric bias.
9
data for DA reactions with nonrelay substrates for easy compari-
son.
Davies has recently introduced the relay concept, using a chiral
auxiliary to install asymmetry.3 Our approach differs from Davies
in that in our relay network, asymmetry originates with a chiral
Lewis acid but is then relayed/amplified via an achiral template.5
There are no reports in the literature in which an achiral template
has been applied for stereocontrol in a systematic way. The design
of our achiral template took into consideration several require-
ments: (1) easy variation of the relay group R, (2) ready
accessibility, (3) easy attachment of the appropriate reaction
fragment, and (4) the presence of donor sites suitable for rotamer
and Lewis acid coordination control.
,4
The DA reactions were carried out at room temperature with
substrates 4a-e and excess cyclopentadiene using 15 mol % of
the catalyst (equation 1, Table 1). On the average, the DA
reactions took 24 h for completion, and yields ranged from 85 to
90%. The endo selectivity was generally good. For ease of ee
determination and absolute stereochemistry analysis, the DA
adducts 6 were converted to the known benzyl ester 7. For our
initial experiments, we chose bisoxazoline 8 whose C-4 methyl
substituent is too small to provide high selectivity in the absence
of chiral relay. As the effective size of the relay group increases
(H < Et < Bn < CH -2-naphthyl, CH -1-naphthyl), so does the
enantioselectivity (entries 1-5). Use of the bulky 1-naphthyl-
methyl relay group (compound 4e) gave 86% ee (entry 5).
Decreasing the reaction temperature to -23 °C further increased
the ee to 96% (entry 6). The data presented in the table suggests
that enantioselectiVity for the major endo adduct correlates
directly with the size of the relay group. The high ee for reaction
with 4e clearly indicates that chiral relay is operatiVe. This high
selectivity with ligand 8 is very impressive since one requires
A novel class of achiral templates which met the above criteria
6
were the pyrazolidinones 1 (Figure 1). The parent (1 R ) H) is
readily available by conjugate addition of hydrazine to 3,3-
7
dimethylacrylate. The relay group R was installed either by
N
simple S 2 alkylation or by reductive amination of aldehydes,
taking advantage of the higher reactivity of the N-1 nitrogen. We
reasoned that in the presence of a chiral Lewis acid, the tetrahedral
N(1)-nitrogen would undergo inversion (2f3) and preferentially
equilibrate to an asymmetric conformation 2 or 3. With the N(1)
conformation determined by the Lewis acid, the substituent R
2
2
(shown as a circle) should in turn provide shielding. In essence,
the chiral Lewis acid would effectively convert an achiral auxiliary
into a chiral auxiliary. It should be emphasized that if chiral relay
(
1) Stinson, S. C. Chem. Eng. News 2001, May 14, 45-56.
(
2) For recent monographs see: Catalytic Asymmetric Synthesis, Ojima, I.
Ed.; Wiley-VCH: New York; 2000. ComprehensiVe Asymmetric Catalysis;
Jacobsen, E. N., Pfaltz, A., Yamamoto, H., Eds.; Springer: New York; 1999.
2
the bulky chiral Lewis acid tert-butylbisoxazoline/Cu(OTf) to
(3) (a) Bull, S. D.; Davies, S. G.; Fox, D. J.; Garner, A. C.; Sellers, T. G.
obtain high selectivity in DA reactions with nonrelay oxazolidi-
R. Pure Appl. Chem. 1998, 70, 1501. (b) Bull, S. D.; Davies, S. G.; Epstein,
S. W.; Ouzman, J. V. A. Chem. Commun. 1998, 659. (c) Bull, S. D.; Davies,
S. G.; Epstein, S. W.; Leech, M. A.; Ouzman, J. V. A. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1 1998, 2321.
9
none crotonate 11. The absolute stereochemistry of the major
9
adduct of 6e was determined to be (2S,3R). That the stereo-
chemical outcome with substrates 4a-e is identical to that
obtained using oxazolidinone crotonate 11 suggests similar
coordination geometries in the two series. The DA reactions with
ligands 9 and 10, which have medium-sized substituents (i-Pr, 9
and Bn, 10), follow the same trend as with ligand 8. Once again,
substrate 4e gave the highest selectivity: 92 and 85% ee at room
temperature and 99 and 96% ee at -23 °C respectiVely. The
results with 4e are in stark contrast to the low selectiVities
(
4) Clayden, J.; Pink, J. H.; Yasin, S. A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 105.
(
5) Only a few examples have been reported to date that apply this concept
in enantioselective reactions. (a) Quaranta, L.; Renaud, P. Chimia 1999, 53,
3
(
64. (b) Quaranta, L.; Ph. D thesis, University of Fribourg, Switzerland, 2000.
c) Balsells, J.; Walsh, P. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 1802. (d) Hiroi,
K.; Ishii, M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 7071. (e) Wada, E.; Pei, W.;
Kanemasa, S. Chem. Lett. 1994, 2345. (f) Wada, E.; Yasuoka, H.; Kanemasa,
S. Chem. Lett. 1994, 1637. (g) Evans, D. A.; Campos, K. R.; Tedrow, J. S.;
Michael, F. E.; Gagn e´ , M. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 7905.
(
6) For detailed procedures of synthesis and characterization data see
Supporting Information.
7) For the effect of gem alkyl substitution on conformation control see:
a) Onimura, K.; Kanemasa, S. Tetrahedron 1992, 48, 8631. (b) Bull, S. D.;
Davies, S. G.; Key, M.-S.; Nicholson, R. L.; Savory, E. D. Chem. Commun.
000, 1721.
(
(8) (a) Dias, L. C. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 1997, 8, 289. (b) Johnson, J. S.;
Evans, D. A. Acc. Chem. Res. 2000, 33, 325.
(9) Evans, D. A.; Miller, S. J.; Lectka, T.; von Matt, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1999, 121, 7559.
(
2
1
0.1021/ja016396b CCC: $20.00 © 2001 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 08/07/2001