chromatography. During our investigation, Crudden et al.3e
reported a mesoporous silicate for the removal of ruthenium
applied to 1 and homogeneous catalysis by ruthenium
hydrides. This requires a large excess of the silicate but is
simple since only a filtration is required. For synthetic
chemists, the most widely used procedure is that of Georg
et al.,3c yet this suffers from lengthy reaction times.
There are several shortcomings of the reported procedures.
First, from an operational standpoint, they take too long: for
a 1-4 h cross enyne metathesis, stirring 12-24 h with an
oxidant is necessary. This slow oxidation has not been shown
to immediately stop metatheses, which is essential for kinetic
analysis4 and to prevent unwanted, secondary metatheses.5
Second, the oxidative procedures reported previously were
shown to be effective for complexes 1 or 2, but not all
metathesis catalysts. For example, phosphine-free initiators,
which are increasingly used in challenging applications, have
not been evaluated in any cleanup protocol. Third, though
the reported procedures remove ruthenium, the specific
reaction is undefined. Recognizing some of the current trends
in metathesis chemistry, we felt that a full range of cross
metatheses should be evaluated. A new procedure would be
desirable if it was fast, efficient for the range of carbene
complexes used, applicable to a variety of metatheses, and
proceeded by known chemistry.
it to evaluate the effectiveness of the quenching method (eq
3). Formation of the formamide and dehydration with POCl3
gave high chemical yield of the ethyl ester 5. Saponification
with KOH (THF-water) and evaporation of the solvent
mixture deposited an odorless8 off-white amorphous solid
(mp 164-165 °C) that was used for quenching. The solid
was not hygroscopic and could be handled in the atmosphere
during weighing. The effectiveness of the quench was
evaluated in a cross enyne metathesis between 1-hexene and
1-benzoyloxy-2-propyne. At about 50% conversion, 44 mol
% isocyanide 5 was added (8.8 equiv based on catalyst;
solution in ca. 1 mL of toluene).9 The reaction immediately
changed yellow with complex 2.10 Further conversion was
not observed, suggesting that catalysis was rapidly stopped.
The effectiveness of the isocyanide quench and optimiza-
tion of the quenching procedure was evaluated in a typical
ring-closing metathesis (RCM). Similar to previous inves-
tigations,3 we chose an inductively coupled plasma (ICP)
analytical method to quantitate ruthenium content in crude
and purified metathesis samples.11 These data were used to
determine the efficiency of the cleanup procedure. The
theoretical amount of ruthenium that should be left at the
end of the reaction is 100 µg/5 mg of sample. We found an
average of 97 µg/5 mg of sample after a 2 h reaction time
using complex 2 (Table 1, entry 1). If the crude reaction
was passed through silica gel, about half the ruthenium was
removed (entry 2). In Table 1, the third column reports the
concentration of ruthenium determined in the assay for a
diluted sample. The last column accounts for the mass of
the sample digested. In the previous literature, concentration
of ruthenium is reported as “µg of Ru found per 5 mg of
crude sample”. The effectiveness of the cleanup should be
evident from the last column; comparisons to literature
methods can also be made from these data.12
We previously observed a unique ligand insertion pro-
moted by carbon monoxide.6 This reaction resulted in
destruction of carbene activity and formed a moderately polar
bis(carbonyl)ruthenium(II) complex. For carbene 2, we
observed Buchner product 3 arising from benzylidene
insertion into a mesityl group (Scheme 2). We observed the
Scheme 2. Donor-Induced Ligand Insertion (Galan et al., Ref 6)
Next, the stoichiometry of the isocyanide addition was
studied. It was expected that at least 2 equiv would be
required based on ruthenium carbene. Each of these runs
same ligand insertion shown in eq 2 using aryl isocyanides.
We reasoned that a polar isocyanide would rapidly quench
the carbene through ligand insertion and confer polarity to
the resulting ruthenium coordination complex. Polarity of
the complex would then permit removal of ruthenium from
the organic products of a typical metathesis reaction. This
process represents a “well-defined” reaction of the no-longer-
wanted carbene catalyst.
(4) For fast enyne metathesis, a rapid and irreversible quench is desirable.
Kinetic studies in enyne metathesis led us to develop the technique described
in this paper.
(5) If a small amount of active catalyst remains during solvent evaporation
or during crude sample storage, the product can undergo carbene-promoted
polymerization (e.g., for a RCM, the reverse reaction: ROMP).
(6) Galan, B.; Gembicky, M.; Dominiak, P. M.; Keister, J. B; Diver, S.
T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 15702-15703.
(7) Obrecht, R.; Hermann, R.; Ugi, I. Synthesis 1985, 400-402.
(8) We typically run the metatheses and the treatment procedure in the
fume hood. Because of its excellent ligand properties, the isocyanide 6 is
assumed to be toxic. Due care should be used in handling the solid to avoid
breathing any fine particulates.
(9) IR was used to follow alkyne consumption, and methanolic solutions
obscured the alkyne CH stretch. As a result, a toluene solution of ester 5
was used instead of carboxylate 6.
A polar isocyanide was prepared and used to quench a
cross metathesis. We prepared the isocyanide salt 67 and used
(3) (a) Maynard, H. D.; Grubbs, R. H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 4137-
4140. (b) Grubbs, R. H. Org. React. 2004, 22, 123-1234. (c) Ahn, Y. M.;
Yang, K.; Georg, G. I. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 1411-1414. (d) Paquette, L. A.;
Schloss, J. D.; Efremov, I.; Fabris, F.; Gallou, F.; Mendez-Andino, J.; Yang,
J. Org. Lett. 2000, 2, 1259-1261. (e) McEleney, K.; Allen, D. P.; Holliday,
A. E.; Crudden, C. M. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 2663-2666. Summary of
methods: (f) Conrad, J. C.; Fogg, D. E. Curr. Org. Chem. 2006, 10, 185-
202.
(10) With the complex 1, the solution turned blue-green.
(11) In this study, we quantitated total ruthenium content in the plasma
and did not use MS to separate isotopes.
(12) 1 µg of Ru detected in a 5 mg sample corresponds to 200 ppm Ru.
1204
Org. Lett., Vol. 9, No. 7, 2007