SULA), demonstrated a higher selectivity and a higher resolution
for the separation of binaphthyl derivatives.29 One of the major
drawbacks associated with the use of polymeric surfactants in
MEKC is the tendency to foul the ionization source in mass
3
0
spectrometry (MS). To solve this problem, Zhu et al. have
recently studied the use of polyelectrolyte multilayer (PEM)-
coated capillaries in open-tubular capillary electrochromatogra-
phy/mass spectrometry (OT-CEC/MS).
An alternative approach to MEKC is the use of OT-CEC, which
was first introduced by Mayer and Schurig.31 They achieved chiral
separation of 1,1′-bi-2-naphthyl-2,2′-dihydrogen phosphate and
1
-phenylethanol by use of capillaries coated with immobilized
32,33
Chiral-Dex. Katayama et al.
introduced a simple coating
procedure that utilized the PEM coating approach for the
performance of achiral separations in OT-CEC. In general, a PEM
coating is formed by alternately exposing a cationic and an anionic
polyelectrolyte on a hydrophilic surface.3
4,35
The mechanism of
formation of PEMs occurs via the ion exchange process that
results in a stable coating.3
6-38
Recently, our laboratory has
investigated the use of PEM coatings for the separation of a
number of chiral and achiral analytes. These studies illustrated
Figure 1. Structures of (a) poly(L-lysine), (b) PDADMAC, (c) poly-
L-SULA), and (d) poly(L-SUAL).
(
3
9-41
an excellent reproducibility and a remarkable stability.
Al-
though this technique has a low phase ratio, selectivity can be
enhanced by increasing the number of bilayers and the salt
between individual surfactant molecules and the micelle. Thus,
organic solvents cannot be used in the background electrolyte
4
1
concentration added to the polymer deposition solutions. Thus,
in separations, the most commonly used cationic polyelectrolytes
for the construction of PEMs have been poly(diallydimethylam-
(BGE) as they interfere with micelle formation. Unlike polymeric
surfactants, conventional micelles require high surfactant con-
centrations above the critical micelle concentration in order to
provide efficient separations.
monium chloride) (PDADMAC)3
9-43
or Polybrene.
32,33,44,45
The use
of polypeptides in OT-CEC for the construction of PEMs is new.
However, it is an important step for the chiral recognition of
enantiomers as these systems mimic the biomembranes in the
human body. Rmaile and Schlenoff46 have recently reported the
Polymeric dipeptide surfactants have been traditionally em-
2
0-25
ployed for chiral separations in MEKC.
selectivity than the single amino acid polymeric surfactants due
They provide a higher
2
0
to the possession of two chiral centers. Shamsi et al. were the
first to report the use of a polymeric dipeptide surfactant. The
authors observed a higher peak efficiency, resolution, and faster
elution, when the polymeric dipeptide surfactant poly(sodium
use of optically active polypeptides consisting of poly(L-lysine) and
poly(glutamic acid) for chiral recognition of ascorbic acid in OT-
CEC. Their work illustrated remarkable permeability and chiral
selectivity.
undecanoyl-L-leucylvalinate), poly(L-SULV), was used. This was
compared to the chromatographic performance of alprenolol,
(
(
(
(
(
(
29) Billiot, F. H.; Billiot, E. J.; Warner, I. M. J. Chromatogr., A 2001, 922, 329-
338.
propanolol, and 1,1′-bi-2-naphthyl-2,2′-dihydrogen phosphate, when
30) Zhu, X.; Kamande, M. W.; Thiam, S.; Kapnissi, C. P.; Mwongela, S. M.;
Warner, I. M. Electrophoresis 2004, 25, 562-568.
31) Mayer, S.; Schurig, V. HRC-J. High Resolut. Chromatogr. 1992, 15, 129-
poly(sodium undecanoyl-L
-valinate) was used. Billiot et al.2
2,26-28
examined several factors that govern enantiomeric recognition
in polymeric dipeptide surfactants. In their studies, Shamsi et al.24
131.
32) Katayama, H.; Ishihama, Y.; Kajima, T.; Asakawa, N. Chromatography 1998,
19, 244-245.
33) Katayama, H.; Ishihama, Y.; Asakawa, N. Anal. Chem. 1998, 70, 2254-
demonstrated that poly(
was capable of resolving various molecular classes of compounds.
Although poly( -SULV) was shown to be a versatile chiral
discriminator, poly(sodium undecanoyl- -leucylalinate), poly(
L-SULV) was a broad chiral selector that
2260.
L
34) Decher, G. Science 1997, 277, 1232-1237.
L
L
-
(35) Decher, G.; Hong, J. D.; Schmitt, J. Thin Solid Films 1992, 210, 831-835.
36) Dubas, S. T.; Schlenoff, J. B. Langmuir 2001, 17, 7725-7727.
(
(
20) Shamsi, S. A.; Macossay, J.; Warner, I. M. Anal. Chem. 1997, 69, 2980-
987.
21) Haddadian, F.; Billiot, E. J.; Shamsi, S. A.; Warner, I. M. J. Chromatogr., A
999, 858, 219-227.
(37) Lowack, K.; Helm, C. A. Macromolecules 1998, 31, 823-833.
(38) Dubas, S. T.; Schlenoff, J. B. Macromolecules 1999, 32, 8153-8160.
(39) Kamande, M. W.; Kapnissi, C. P.; Zhu, X. F.; Akbay, C.; Warner, I. M.
Electrophoresis 2003, 24, 945-951.
2
(
1
(
22) Billiot, E.; Warner, I. M. Anal. Chem. 2000, 72, 1740-1748.
(40) Kapnissi, C. P.; Akbay, C.; Schlenoff, J. B.; Warner, I. M. Anal. Chem. 2002,
74, 2328-2335.
(23) Haddadian, F.; Shamsi, S. A.; Warner, I. M. Electrophoresis 1999, 20, 3011-
3
026.
24) Shamsi, S. A.; Valle, B. C.; Billiot, F.; Warner, I. M. Anal. Chem. 2003, 75,
79-387.
(41) Kapnissi, C. P.; Valle, B. C.; Warner, I. M. Anal. Chem. 2003, 75, 6097-
6104.
(42) Graul, T. W.; Schlenoff, J. B. Anal. Chem. 1999, 71, 4007-4013.
(43) Liu, Y.; Fanguy, J. C.; Bledsoe, J. M.; Henry, C. S. Anal. Chem. 2000, 72,
5939-5944.
(
3
(
(
25) Haynes, J. L.; Warner, I. M. Rev. Anal. Chem. 1999, 18, 317-382.
26) Billiot, E.; Macossay, J.; Thibodeaux, S.; Shamsi, S. A.; Warner, I. M. Anal.
Chem. 1998, 70, 1375-1381.
(44) Katayama, H.; Ishihama, Y.; Asakawa, N. Anal. Chem. 1998, 70, 5272-
5277.
(
27) Billiot, E.; Agbaria, R. A.; Thibodeaux, S.; Shamsi, S.; Warner, I. M. Anal.
Chem. 1999, 71, 1252-1256.
28) Billiot, F. H.; Thibodeaux, S.; Shamsi, S.; Warner, I. M. Anal. Chem. 1999,
(45) Bendahl, L.; Hansen, S. H.; Gammelgaard, B. Electrophoresis 2001, 22,
2565-2573.
(
7
1, 4044-4049.
(46) Rmaile, H. H.; Schlenoff, J. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 6602-6603.
6682 Analytical Chemistry, Vol. 76, No. 22, November 15, 2004