1730
Huanhui Chen et al. / Chinese Journal of Catalysis 36 (2015) 1726–1732
was analyzed by GC-MAS and the results are shown in Fig. 1(d).
The deuterium distribution density results (Fig. 1(d))
showed that C6D5CD3 existed as the major species in the reac-
tion mixture when the catalytic process was conducted with
active carbon. This result indicated that it was difficult to con-
vert C6H5CH3 to the corresponding C6H5CH2• radical using acti-
vated carbon as a catalyst. Furthermore, the experiments in-
volving the side-chain alkylation of toluene showed that the
conversion of toluene was about 0.1% when the reaction was
conducted over active carbon (Table 1). Taken together, these
results show that the catalytic effect of activated carbon to-
wards the side-chain alkylation of C6H5CH3 was in agreement
its catalytic effect towards the conversion of C6H5CH3 to
Fig. 2. The captodative effect of metal cation and anion on the frame-
work.
•
of CsX towards the conversion of C6H5CH3 to C6H5CH2 was
critical to its higher catalytic activity towards the side-chain
alkylation of toluene compared with KX.
•
C6H5CH2 . In contrast, when the reaction was conducted in the
3.4. CO2 effect on the selectivity of styrene
presence of a X-type zeolite (KX or CsX), the amount of C6D5CD3
decreased sharply, whereas the amount deuterated toluene-d1
increased considerably. This result demonstrates that the zeo-
lite was having a significant effect on activating toluene to-
wards free radicals. The effect of the zeolite could be attributed
to a captodative effect involving the synergistic effect of elec-
tron-withdrawing (captor) and electron-releasing (donor)
groups attached to the radical center, which could make the
radical much more stable [19]. As the toluene molecules en-
tered the cavities of the zeolite, the cations would form com-
plexes with the aromatic rings, and the resulting complexes
would attract electrons. At the same time, the anions within the
zeolite framework would donate an electron to the methyl
group of toluene (Fig. 2). Based on these interactions, the zeo-
lite would be able to stabilize the C6H5CH2• radical.
Several experiments were designed to improve the selectiv-
ity of the side-chain alkylation reaction of toluene based on the
radical reaction mechanism. Notably, CO2 was used as a carrier
gas instead of N2. Under an atmosphere of N2, there are three
possible reaction routes for H• (Fig. 3(a)), including: (1) the
reaction of H• with CH3OH following route S to generate
•CH2OH, which would be subsequently converted to styrene;
(2) the reaction of H• with CH3OH according to route E1 to gen-
•
erate CH3 , which would subsequently react with toluene to
give C6H5CH2CH3; and (3) the reaction of H• with C6H5CH=CH2
following route E2 to give C6H5CH2CH3. Under an atmosphere of
CO2, H• would react with CO2 to form •COOH. The high bonding
energy of the C–H bond in formic acid (ca. 468 kJ/mol) indi-
•
cates that the COOH radical could readily abstract a H atom
Compared with the KX catalyst, more of the deuterium at-
oms present in the mixture existed as toluene-d1 following the
CsX-catalyzed process. The fact that more deuterium atoms
were exchanged from deuterated toluene to toluene using the
CsX catalyst demonstrated that the H/D exchange process oc-
curred to a much greater extent over the CsX catalyst than it did
from the methyl group of CH3OH to form HCOOH as an inter-
mediate, which could decompose to give H2 and CO2 at the end
of the reaction (Fig. 3(b)). It would be much more difficult for
the •COOH radical to obtain an OH moiety from CH3OH to form
H2CO3 because of the low bonding energy of the C–OH bond in
H2CO3. CH3OH would therefore be more inclined to form sty-
rene following route S because the reaction of CH3OH with
•COOH would be relative facile and energetically favorable. The
presence of CO2 would lead to a decrease in the concentration
of H•, which would lead to a further decrease in the production
of C6H5CH2CH3 from the reaction between styrene and H•. Thus,
the selectivity of the reaction for styrene would be increased.
Pleasingly, the experimental results of this study were found to
be consistent with the design strategy, as shown in Table 1,
with the conversion of toluene decreasing slightly and the se-
lectivity for styrene increasing from 17.4% to 59.4% when the
reaction was conducted under CO2.
•
over the KX catalyst and that the C6H5CH2 radical was much
more stable over CsX. Cs can lose an electron more readily than
K, which means that the CsX zeolite has a weaker Cs+ cation
(electron-withdrawing) and stronger framework anion (elec-
tron-releasing) than the KX zeolite. The cooperativity of the
acceptor and donor moieties of the CsX zeolite therefore pos-
sesses better captodative effects to increase the stability of the
•
C6H5CH2 radical. Furthermore, CsX exhibited higher catalytic
activity towards the side-chain alkylation of toluene than KX.
The levels of toluene conversion using the CsX and KX zeolites
were found to be 16.6% and 3.6% (Table 1), respectively. This
result therefore demonstrates that the higher catalytic activity
Table 1
Toluene side-chain alkylation data.
Conversion of
toluene (%)
Yield of
styrene (%)
Yield of EB
(%)
Selectivity of
styrene (%)
Conversion of
methanol (%)
Yield of
methane (%)
Yield of CO
(%)
Catalyst
C
KX
CsX
0.75
3.60
16.60
13.80
0.15
1.32
2.89
8.20
0.15
1.37
12.67
7.80
—
—
17.4
59.4
—
99.4
98.2
—
—
43.5
34.2
—
—
49.3
48.2
—
CsX (CO2 atmosphere)
YCO = NCO, out /NMeOH, in, Ymethane = Nmethane, out /NMeOH, in, where Ni is calculated from the GC response signal (area of the FID or TCD peak) using the response
factors for individual components and converted into mols.