Organic Letters
Letter
6a to 7a, quantitative deuterium retention suggests that γ-
deprotonation is the sole mechanism involved. Furthermore,
the diastereospecific nature of the deuterium migration
between the two diastereomers strongly suggests that the
migration occurs via a suprafacial [1,5] sigmatropic shift,
leaving the γ-deprotonation route (Scheme 3b) as the most
plausible mechanism.
The IMDA reactions presented herein were modeled using
DFT calculations. For each substrate, the transition state was
identified for the endo and exo product, and the geometries
and energies for starting materials and products were
determined. (The Bn group was replaced by Me in entries
1−4.) For compound 1, the activation energy for the endo
transition state was 17.05 kcal/mol, and the preference for the
endo transition state was 9.70 kcal/mol with respect to the exo
TS. The activation energies for the transition states ranged
from 17 to 21 kcal/mol. The preference for the observed
transition state (endo or exo) is included in Table 1 for each
entry, and full details of the calculations are reported in the
Finally, we sought to explore synthetically useful derivatiza-
tions of the products of our silacycle-templated IMDA
cyclizations. To this end, it was desirable to isolate the silyl
enol ether intermediate analogous to C, as this functional
group is a synthon for a number of useful transformations.
Gratifyingly, upon replacement of the typical HF workup with
a mild aqueous workup, silacycle-containing Diels−Alder
adduct 19 was isolated in 62% yield (Scheme 4). This silyl
Our investigation of the substrate scope of our silacycle-
templated IMDA strategy began with some simple modifica-
tions to the original system. First, we report our model
substrate 1 from the optimization study (Figure 1, entry 1).
The desired IMDA proceeded in good recovered yield, albeit
less than our measured NMR yield from Table 1. Nonetheless,
this entry demonstrates that an extension of the dienophile-
bearing chain by one methylene unit can efficiently deliver a
cyclohexyl-fused norbornane skeleton. Exclusive exo selectivity
was achieved from 8, which bears a Z olefin geometry at the
dienophile (entry 2). Entry 3 catalogues an endo selective
IMDA to afford a cyclopentene-fused norbornane scaffold.
Finally, in entry 4, a vinyl sulfone proves to be a competent
dienophile for this reaction, furnishing the corresponding
norbornane in moderate yield. Attempts to expand this
methodology to six-membered vinylogous esters have thus
far proven unsuccessful, as elimination of the β-alcohol
outcompetes the desired Diels−Alder reaction for these
substrates. A detailed table of failed substrates can be found
Scheme 4. Product Derivatizations
Next, we probed more challenging changes to our system
using substrates that no longer benefit from being highly
activated, Danishefsky-like dienes. It is worth noting that these
substrates required increased temperatures (80 °C in
ClCH2CH2Cl) to reach full conversion, likely as a result of
the lower HOMO energy of the diene. Replacing the cyclic
vinylogous ester of previous substrates with the simple
cyclopentenone in 14 (entry 5) afforded simple norbornane
15-endo in moderate yield. The decrease in yield as compared
to those of the more activated substrates is attributed to a
competing elimination of the alcohol to afford a product
analogous to 3. Interestingly, 16, the constitutional isomer of
14 (entry 6), also afforded 15-endo, albeit in low yield.
Presumably, this convergence is possible as the result of [1,5]
hydride shifts allowing the silacycle intermediate of 16 to
sample all possible reactive dienes for the IMDA. It is worth
noting that substrates such as 16 can be derived from a
strategic Baylis−Hillman disconnection. This outcome high-
lights a practical use of the conclusions drawn from our
mechanistic study.
Finally, entries 7 and 8 present an intriguing mechanistic
case. We initially probed these two substrates anticipating that
their respective Diels−Alder adducts would be epimeric at the
methylene bridge. However, we were surprised to find that
both 17a and 17b afforded 19 in moderate yield.25 One
possible explanation for this outcome arises from regioselective
deprotonations of the different diastereomers. If ketone 17a
were to exclusively undergo an α-deprotonation pathway and
ketone 17b were to exclusively go through γ-deprotonation,
then, after [1,5] hydride shifts, the same diene would be
produced in both cases, which would lead to the observed
product 19. Such a result would not necessarily be at odds with
our mechanistic study given that the additional substitution at
the γ-position may lead to a deprotonation preference different
from that observed in Scheme 3.
enol ether was subsequently employed in a Mukaiyama aldol
reaction that successfully forged an all-carbon quaternary
center and afforded 20 in moderate yield as a mixture of
diastereomers. Less sensitive reactions allowed 19 to be taken
forward without purification, avoiding any hydrolysis of this
sensitive functional group that may occur in the course of silica
gel chromatography. For example, crude 19 was successfully
derivatized as osmate ester 21, allowing for X-ray crystallo-
graphic analysis to confirm our assigned relative configuration
(Figure 2).26−28 Additionally, crude 19 was brominated to
afford tertiary bromide 22 in 50% yield over two steps. Finally,
to target carbon skeletons beyond the cyclopentyl- and
cyclohexyl-fused norbornanes explored thus far, a Baeyer−
2186
Org. Lett. 2021, 23, 2183−2188