1426 J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 123, No. 7, 2001
Gritsan et al.
Scheme 1
before the experiments were performed.11 For example, the
calculations correctly predicted not only that cyclization of
singlet o-fluorophenylnitrene (14b) would occur at the unsub-
stituted ortho carbon, forming 5b,9b but also that cyclization at
this carbon would encounter a barrier 0.9 kcal/mol higher than
that for cyclization of unsubstituted phenylnitrene.10b Although
the existence of small electronic effects on the barriers to
cyclization was acknowledged, the computational results were
interpreted as indicating that steric effects play the major role
in raising the barriers to cyclization at substituted ortho carbons.
The apparent absence of large electronic effects on the
cyclization reactions of derivatives of phenylnitrene12 was
attributed to the electronic structure of the lowest-singlet state.11
Minimization of the Coulombic repulsion between the two
electrons of opposite-spin in the nonbonding molecular orbitals
(NBMOs) results in this state of phenylnitrene resembling a
cyclohexadienyl radical, with an iminyl radical center doubly
bonded to the remaining ring carbon.13 Therefore, cyclization
of 11 and 14 only requires movement of the imino nitrogen out
of the molecular plane, allowing it to form a bond to the 2p-π
orbital on one of the two ortho carbons, where an electron of
opposite spin appears.
the larger size of cyano relative to hydrogen. Therefore, attack
at a substituted ortho carbon is more likely to occur when the
substituent is cyano, rather than a less radical-stabilizing
substituent, such as fluoro or methyl.
Consistent with this hypothesis, Smalley and co-workers have
found that singlet o-cyanophenylnitrene (14c) undergoes ring
expansion to afford not only 5c, the product formed by
cyclization away from the cyano substituent, but also 6c, the
product formed by cyclization toward the cyano group.14a
Similar results have been found in the ring expansion of singlet
o-acetylphenylnitrene.14b
Because no unpaired spin appears at the meta carbons of 11,
a cyano substituent at one of these carbons would be anticipated
to have only a small effect on the barrier to cyclization at either
of the two, nonequivalent ortho carbons, especially since meta
fluoro10b substitution does not influence the rate constant for
cyclization of phenylnitrene. However, if a para cyano sub-
stituent tends to localize spin at the carbon to which it is
attached, the concomitant decrease in unpaired spin density at
the ortho carbons would be expected to raise the barrier to
cyclization.
To test these qualitative predictions, we have performed ab
initio calculations, laser flash photolysis experiments, and
chemical trapping studies. In this paper we report the results of
these combined theoretical and experimental investigations.
One might expect that a radical-stabilizing, ortho or para
substituent, such as a cyano group, would tend to localize the
unpaired π electron in the six-membered ring at the carbon to
which the substituent is attached. This localization should make
attack by the nitrogen at the cyano-substituted ortho carbon in
14c electronically more favorable than attack at the unsubstituted
ortho carbon, thus tending to counteract the steric effect due to
Computational Methodology
Geometry optimizations were performed with the 6-31G*
basis set,15 using complete active space (CAS)SCF calcula-
tions.16 An eight-electron, eight-orbital active space, hereafter
designated (8/8), was used for all species. The (8/8) active space
for the reactants consisted of seven π MOs, plus the in plane
2p AO on nitrogen. The active space for the transition states
and products consisted of six orbitals that were mainly π in
character plus a σ /σ* pair for the incipient azirine C-N bond.
(8/8)CASSCF/6-31G* vibrational frequencies were calculated
for all stationary points to verify whether each was an
intermediate or a transition state. The unscaled (8/8)CASSCF
frequencies were also used to compute the zero-point vibrational
corrections to the energies. The CASSCF calculations were
performed using the Gaussian 94 suite of programs.17 The
geometries, absolute energies, and vibrational corrections for
all of the stationary points are available as Supporting Informa-
tion.
(4) (a) Carroll, S. E.; Nay, B.; Scriven, E. F. V.; Suschitzky, H.; Thomas,
D. R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1977, 3175. (b) Dunkin, I. R.; Thomson, P. C. P.
J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1980, 499. (c) Nielson, P. E.; Buchardt, O.
Photochem. Photobiol. 1982, 35, 317. (d) Younger, C. G.; Bell, R. A. J.
Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1992, 359. (e) Morawietz, J.; Sander, W. J.
Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 4351.
(5) Karney, W. L.; Borden, W. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 1378.
(6) (a) Banks, R. E.; Sparkes, G. R. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1972,
2964. (b) Banks, R. E.; Prakash, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1973, 99. (c) Banks,
R. E.; Prakash, A. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1974, 1365.
(7) (a) Poe, R.; Grayzar, J.; Young, M. J. T.; Leyva, E.; Schnapp, K.;
Platz, M. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 3209. (b) Poe, R.; Schnapp, K.;
Young, M. J. T.; Grayzar, J.; Platz, M. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114,
5054. (c) Marcinek, A.; Platz, M. S. J. Phys. Chem. 1993, 97, 12674. (d)
Marcinek, A.; Platz, M. S.; Chan, S. Y.; Floresca, R.; Rajagopalan, K.;
Golinski, M.; Watt, D. J. Phys. Chem. 1994, 98, 412. (e) Gritsan, N. P.;
Zhai, H. B.; Yuzawa, T.; Karweik, D.; Brooke, J.; Platz, M. S., J. Phys.
Chem. A 1997, 101, 2833.
(8) (a) Dunkin, I. R.; Donnelly, T.; Lockhart, T. S. Tetrahedron Lett.
1985, 26, 359. (b) Gritsan, N. P.; Gudmundsdo´ttir, A. D.; Tigelaar, D.;
Platz, M. S. J. Phys. Chem. A 1999, 103, 3458.
(9) (a) Sundberg, R. J.; Suter, S. R.; Brenner, M. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1972, 94, 513. (b) Leyva, E.; Sagredo, R. Tetrahedron 1998, 54, 7367.
(10) (a) Schnapp, K. A.; Poe, R.; Leyva, E.; Soundararajan, N.; Platz,
M. S. Bioconjugate Chem. 1993, 4, 172. (b) Gritsan, N. P.; Gudmundsdo´ttir,
A. D.; Tigelaar, D.; Zhu, Z.; Karney, W. L.; Hadad, C. M.; Platz, M. S. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. Manuscript submitted.
CASPT2/6-31G* calculations18 were performed at the (8,8)-
CASSCF/6-31G* stationary point geometries. The CASPT2
calculations were carried out with MOLCAS.19 Because the
CASPT2 calculations include dynamic electron correlation,20
but the CASSCF calculations do not, we deem the CASPT2
results to be the more accurate.
(11) Karney, W. L.; Borden, W. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 3347.
(12) Gritsan, N. P.; Tigelaar, D.; Platz, M. S. J. Phys. Chem. A 1999,
103, 4465.
(13) (a) Kim, S.-J.; Hamilton, T. P.; Schaefer, H. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1992, 114, 5349. (b) Hrovat, D. A.; Waali, E. E.; Borden, W. T. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 8698. (c) Castell, O.; Garc´ıa, V. M.; Bo, C.; Caballol,
R. J. Comput. Chem. 1996, 17, 42.
(14) (a) Lamara, K.; Redhouse, A. D.; Smalley, R. K.; Thompson, J. R.
Tetrahedron 1994, 50, 5515. (b) Berwick, M. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1971,
93, 5780.
(15) Hariharan, P. C.; Pople, J. A. Theor. Chim. Acta 1973, 28, 213.
(16) (a) Roos, B. O. AdV. Chem. Phys. 1987, 69, 339. (b) Roos, B. O.
Int. J. Quantum Chem. Symp. 1980, 14, 175.