G.A. Blade, et al.
JournalofInorganicBiochemistry212(2020)111253
oxidative cleavage of an ARD substrate analogue under atmospheric
oxygen and ambient conditions [20]. Although these are functional
models, the N4 systems lack all of the structural and electronic char-
acteristics to accurately mimic the electronic environment of ARD's
active site, specifically the introduction of the oxygen moiety corre-
sponding to the glutamate donor in ARD. It is important to note that
additional work reported the use of an N3 chelating ligand (2,6-bis(1-
methylbenzimidazolyl)pyridine) to make Ni(II) complexes that were
shown to be reactive with substituted diketones towards CeC oxidative
bond cleavage analogous to the enzymatic reactivity [21]. These re-
sults, however, were recently put into question suggesting that activa-
tion of electron deficient diketone substrates was not reproducible in
these complexes.[22]. The biomimetic precedents argue in favor of
models that more closely align with the electronic and structural
characteristics of the enzyme. In the present work we introduce the
synthesis and characterization of a family of structural models closely
related to ARD, which more closely mimic the electronic structure of
the active site and constitute proof of principle for future systematic
structure-function studies of ARD's oxidative reactivity using model
complexes. We report here preliminary results of their biomimetic
carbon‑carbon cleavage reactivity towards a substrate mimic, and a
proposed mechanism for the observed reactivity. This work expands
ongoing biomimetic studies to advance the aforementioned debate re-
garding the unique reactivity of ARD.
corresponding aldehyde and NaBH(OAc)3 were added to the reaction
mixture and allowed to react for an additional 30 min. The reaction was
then quenched with 15 mL of 2 M NaOH and extracted with di-
chloromethane and washed with saturated sodium chloride solution,
followed by drying over anhydrous sodium sulfate. The solvent was
removed under reduced pressure, then further dried under vacuum,
resulting in a brown oil in 88% yield. The acetyl protecting group was
removed by adding 20 mL of 5 M aqueous hydrochloric acid and al-
lowed to reflux for 24 h under an N2 atmosphere. The resulting solution
was treated with careful addition of 5 M NaOH and the organics were
extracted with dichloromethane. Afterwards, the organics were dried
over anhydrous KOH and dried under reduced pressure. Spectroscopic
details of ligand precursors can be found in the supporting information
document.
2.4. Synthesis of metal complexes
2.4.1. [NiII(OPhN4(6-H-DPEN)(H2O)](OTf) (1)
The synthesis and characterization of complex 1 was published in
2.4.2. [NiII(OPhNO2N4(6-Me-DPEN)(H2O)](OTf) (2)
Synthesis of the metal complex 2 was formed via an in-situ re-
ductive amination reaction. The 6-Me-DPEN ligand precursor (192 mg,
0.751 mmol) was dissolved in 5 mL dichloroethane with 4 Å molecular
sieves. One equivalent of the corresponding aldehyde, 2-hydroxy-5-ni-
trobenzaldehyde (126 mg, 0.751 mmol) was added and the mixture was
allowed to react for 3 h. The solvent was then removed under reduced
pressure and further dried under vacuum. 5 mL of MeOH and one
equivalent of N,N-diisopropylethylamine (0.0759 mL, 0.751 mmol)
were added and allowed to stir for 20 min. Nickel tri-
fluoromethanesulfonate (268 mg, 0.751 mmol) was then added and the
reaction was allowed to stir under dynamic nitrogen at room tem-
perature for two days. The resulting solution was filtered through a frit
under vacuum and then pumped down under reduced pressure. The
resulting oil was washed with diethyl ether three times and then
pumped down once again. A green powder was isolated.
2. Experimental section
2.1. Materials and methods
The preparation and manipulation of air-sensitive compounds were
performed using standard Schlenk techniques under an N2 atmosphere.
Reagents and solvents were purchased from commercial suppliers of the
highest available purity and used without further purification unless
otherwise noted. Solvents (MeOH, MeCN, 2-Butanone, and Et2O) were
dried using 4 Å molecular sieves. Solvents were degassed via freeze-
pump-thaw cycles.
2.2. Physical methods
Yield = 74.2% (351.7 mg, 0.557 mmol). Electronic absorption
spectrum (MeOH): λ (nm) (ε (M−1 cm−1): for complex 2: 235 (5128),
371 (3896), 575 (99). IR: C=N: 1654 cm−1 We were not able to isolate
complex 2 as an analytically pure sample. HRMS (ESI-MS, m/z): calcd.
for [C23H24N5NiO3]+: found: 476.1226, calculated: 476.1227.
1H NMR spectra were recorded on a Varian 300 MHz spectrometer
at room temperature and referenced to a residual deuterated solvent.
UV–vis spectra were recorded in a 1 cm quartz cuvette on a Varian Cary
100 Bio spectrophotometer. Attenuated Total reflectance-Fourier-
Transform Infrared spectra (ATR-FTIR) were recorded with an Agilent/
Cary 630 FTIR KBr or ZnSe engine. The electrochemical data were
obtained using CH Instrument 600E Electrochemical workstation. ESI-
Mass spectral data were collected using Agilent Technologies 6530
Accurate-Mass Q-TOF LC/MS equipped with a Jet Stream electrospray
ionization (ESI) source. Elemental analyses were performed by
Galbraith Atlantic Microlabs, Norcross, GAt
2.4.3. [NiII(OPhNO2N4(6-H-DPEN)(H2O)](OTf) (3)
The synthesis of complex 3 followed the procedure outlined for
complex 2 with the alteration of using the 6-H-DPEN ligand precursor
(63.5 mg, 0.262 mmol). A yellow powder was isolated. Yield = 80%
(129.1 mg, 0.2096 mmol). Electronic absorption spectrum (MeOH): λ
(nm) (ε (M−1 cm−1): for complex 3: 237 (9386), 381 (6879), 567
(115). IR: C=N: 1650 cm−1 Elemental Analysis for NiO7N5C22H22SF3
Calcd: C, 42.88%; H, 3.60%; N, 11.37%. Found: C, 43.14%; H, 3.49%;
N, 11.34%. HRMS (ESI-MS, m/z): calcd. for [C21H20N5NiO3]+: found:
448.09170, calculated: 448.0914.
2.3. Synthesis of ligand precursors 6-H-DPEN (LP1) and 6-Me-DPEN (LP2)
The ligand precursors N,N-Bis(2-pyridilmethyl)ethane-1,2-diamine
(6-H-DPEN, L1) and N,N-Bis(6-Me-2-pyridilmethyl)ethane-1,2-diamine
(6-Me-DPEN, L2) were synthesized using slight modifications to pre-
viously reported synthetic procedures.23-25 N-acetylethylenediamine
(141 μL, 1.03 mmol), and the corresponding aldehyde (2-pyr-
idinecarboxaldehyde or 6-Me-2-pyridinecarboxaldehyde, 139 μL,
1.03 mmol) were dissolved in 10 mL of 1,2-dichloroethane and allowed
to stir under an N2 atmosphere at room temperature. The reaction
progress was monitored via thin layer chromatography using ninhydrin
stain to screen for any unreacted amine. After ~30 min, an equivalent
of NaBH(OAc)3 (0.4375 g, 2.89 mmol) was added to the reaction
mixture. Continual monitoring via TLC was done as the mixture was
allowed to react for 2 h. After this period an additional equivalent of the
2.5. X-ray crystallography
Single crystals of 1–3 were used for X-ray crystallographic studies.
This analysis was performed at the University of Texas at Austin X-ray
facility laboratories. X-ray data collection was done on a Rigaku AFC12
diffractometer with a Saturn 724+ CCD using a graphite mono-
chromator with MoKα radiation (λ = 0.71073 Å). The data were col-
lected at 100 K using a Rigaku XStream Cryostream low temperature
device. Crystal data, refinement parameters, and additional details can
be found in the supporting information for this manuscript.
3