Communications
doi.org/10.1002/cctc.202100804
ChemCatChem
Our exploration began with simply applying reaction
observed an increase in yield, however, the observed TON
slightly decreased (Table 1, entries 9 and 10). Therefore, we
have used 2 mol% for all subsequent reactions. To probe if the
reaction benefitted from acid catalysis, which we introduced
with the choice of gold salt made, we used the potassium
congener KAuBr4 instead and observed essentially the same
catalytic activity (Table 1, entry 11). A side product we occasion-
ally observed in these transformations was acetoxylated
iodobenzene (see supporting information for details), which can
be ascribed to the decomposition of the oxidant. To probe if
the efficiency of the process could be increased by preventing
this decomposition, we tested two modifications of the oxidant,
conditions that mimicked those reported for the acetoxylation
of aromatic compounds (Table 1) using cyclooctane as a
À 1 [13]
substrate, with a reported BDE of 95.7 kcalmol . When we
carried the reaction out under an atmosphere of N2 using
simple Ph PAuCl or AuCl we observed an essentially stoichio-
3
3
metric formation of the acetoxylated product with respect to
the amount of gold added (Table 1, entries 1 and 2). In contrast,
when these reactions were performed under aerobic conditions
a slight increase for the acetoxylated product was observed
with concomitant formation of alcohol and ketone products
(
Table 1, entries 3 and 4). This raised the question if the alcohol
and ketone products were formed with the involvement of
being the penta-fluoro and p-NO versions (Table 1, entries 12
and 13). For the penta-fluoro substituted oxidant this resulted
in no significant improvement of the TONs for the acetoxylation
2
[7a]
gold, much as in the case of the report of Shul’pin et al., or if
there was a pathway that would not require any transition
metal catalyst. We found that in the absence of gold the
reaction. However, the use of the p-NO substituted oxidant did
2
[14]
reaction readily produces alcohol and ketone, yet does not
lead to noticeable amounts of acetoxylated product. When
oxygen was removed, this pathway leading to alcohol and
ketone is suppressed (Table 1, entries 5 and 6). Furthermore, no
oxygenated products were observed in the absence of gold and
the oxidant under aerobic reaction conditions (Table 1, entry 7).
increase the yield of acetoxylation slightly and provided a TON
of 8.
To develop a better idea of the nature of this reaction, we
decided to explore the oxidation of another substrate with a
comparable reported CÀ H BDE. We selected adamantane, which
À 1
features tertiary CÀ H bonds with a BDE of 96.2 kcalmol , in
This means that there is a PhI(OAc) -promoted pathway towards
addition to
a
set of secondary ones with a BDE of
2
À 1 [15]
alcohol and ketone formation, which is not affected by gold.
We assign the small amount of acetoxylated product, which
was also formed in the absence of oxygen, to originate from a
gold-promoted process and subsequently further evaluated
different gold sources (see supporting information for further
98.4 kcalmol . This choice of substrate allows us to examine
3
how the nature of the C(sp )À H bond influences reactivity and
also probes selectivity. When applying the reaction conditions
that resulted in catalytic turnover (HAuBr ) we also observed
4
acetoxylation (Table 2). This reaction showed the expected
preference for the weaker tertiary CÀ H bond. Most notably, the
TONs are higher, especially when considering the sum of
acetoxylated products. Unlike in the case of cyclooctane, the
amounts of alcohol and ketone formed are much lower.
However, when we carried the reaction out in the absence of
HAuBr4 under aerobic conditions we observed alcohol and
ketone products alongside a significant amount of acetoxylated
details). We found that a catalytic amount of HAuBr resulted in
4
an increased yield and resulted in TONs of 4.5–5. Noticeably,
this was not significantly influenced by the presence or absence
of air. In the presence of air, however, the background reaction,
producing alcohol and ketone side products, was again
observed. Throughout we have used a catalyst loading of
2
mol%. When we increased the catalyst loading to 5 mol% we
[a]
Table 1. Acetoxylation of cyclooctane.
[
b,c]
[b,c]
[b]
[b]
Entry
Catalyst
Oxidant
Aerobic / N
2
-one
%]
-ol
Yield of product
[%]
TON
[
[%]
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1
1
1
1
Ph
AuCl
Ph PAuCl
3
PAuCl
3
X=H
X=H
X=H
X=H
X=H
X=H
–
5
5
5
5
5
5
N
N
2
n/o
n/o
11
8
12
trace
n/o
8
n/o
n/o
n/o
n/o
2
trace
1
trace
n/o
1
n/o
n/o
trace
trace
trace
2
2
5
5
n/o
n/o
n/o
8
10
16
9
1
1
2
2
–
–
–
4
5
3
5
5
8
2
3
Aerobic
Aerobic
Aerobic
AuCl
3
–
–
–
N
2
Aerobic
Aerobic
HAuBr
HAuBr
HAuBr
4
4
4
X=H
X=H
X=H
X=H
5
5
5
5
N
2
N
2
N
2
N
2
N
2
[
d]
0
1
2
3
KAuBr
HAuBr
HAuBr
4
trace
trace
trace
[
[
e]
e]
4
4
X= F
5
10
16
X=p-NO
2
[
a] Reaction conditions: substrate (2.5 mmol), oxidant (0.5 mmol), catalyst (2 mol%), DCE (1 mL), 110°C, 3 h. Yields lower than 1% are listed as trace. n/o=
Not observed. Experiments were performed in triplicate. [b] Yields and TONs were determined by GC using mesitylene as an internal standard; [c] Yields of
cyclooctanol and cyclooctanone; [d] catalyst (5 mol%); [e] Single run.
ChemCatChem 2021, 13, 1–6
2
© 2021 The Authors. ChemCatChem published by Wiley-VCH GmbH
��
These are not the final page numbers!