Table 1. Identification of Suitable Coupling Partnera
Table 2. Effects of Added Bases on Conversion
entry
X
equiv
time (h)
conversion (%)b
entry
base
time (h)
conversion (%)a
1
B(OH)2
B(OH)2
SnMe3
OTf
Cl
Br
I
5
5
15
13
15
6
18
18
18
20
10
0
0
0
0
10
15
16
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Li2CO3
MgO
6
6
6
20
18
0
0
13
9
2c
3
4
5
6
7
8e
1.5
2
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
NaOH
KOtBu
DMPb
PMPc
iPr2EtN
Et3N
6
20
20
6
33
32
I
6
a coe ) cyclooctene. b Conversion to 1 was monitored by GC-MS
relative to hexamethyl-benzene internal standard. c 5 equiv of K2CO3 used.
d Reaction performed at 105 °C. e Free phosphine (PCy3) used.
a Conversion to 1 was monitored by GC-MS relative to hexamethyl-
benzene internal standard. b 2,6-dimethylpyridine. c 1,2,2,6,6,-pentameth-
ylpiperidine.
(I) catalyst and subsequently coupled to an alkene, yielding
the alkylated azole.7 Investigation into the mechanism of this
reaction revealed that the catalysis proceeds via an N-
heterocyclic carbene (NHC) intermediate.8 It was hypoth-
esized that such an intermediate might be capable of
undergoing other coupling processes, such as arylation.9
Initial efforts toward this goal focused on the identification
of a suitable coupling partner to accomplish the desired cross-
coupling reaction with benzimidazole using optimized condi-
tions from the alkylation reaction (Table 1). Entry 1 shows
that phenylboronic acid does indeed provide the desired
product, but addition of a Brønsted base (entry 2), in analogy
with conventional Suzuki couplings,1a,e gave no conversion.
Neither trimethyl(phenyl)tin nor phenyl triflate gave encour-
aging results (entries 3 and 4). The best results in this initial
screen were obtained using aryl halides as coupling partners
(entries 5-8). The order of reactivity was found to be ArCl
< ArBr < ArI. In the case of aryl iodides, product was
observed even at the reduced temperature of 105 °C, and
the free phosphine was found to be comparable to PCy3‚
HCl (entry 8), which had proven advantageous in the
alkylation reaction.7c
catalyst decomposition or other deleterious side reactions.
Thus, a thorough investigation of the effect of added base
on the coupling reaction was undertaken (Table 2). A number
of inorganic bases were initially screened (entries 1-4).
Lithium carbonate provided a moderate increase in the
observed conversion, but other oxygen bases, such as metal
oxides, hydroxides, and alkoxides, failed to give further
increases in conversion. Nitrogen bases were next screened
(entries 5-8), and a positive influence of hindered, tertiary
alkylamines was observed. Triethylamine served as an
efficient and convenient base, providing the product in 32%
conversion in 6 h.
A diverse array of phosphines, having variable steric and
electronic properties, were also screened (Table 3). Triaryl
phosphines, chelating phosphines, phosphites, and phos-
phoramidites gave no conversion. A number of hindered
trialkylphosphines provided yields comparable to that using
tricyclohexylphosphine (entries 2 and 4), but none could
provide conversion higher than that originally obtained for
tricyclohexylphosphine. Interestingly, conversion was ob-
Because HI is the sole byproduct of the coupling reaction,
it was thought that this strong acid might be responsible for
Table 3. Effects of Phosphine on Conversion
(5) (a) Okazawa, T.; Satoh, T.; Miura, M.; Nomura, M. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2002, 124, 5286-5287. (b) Gallagher, W. P.; Maleczka, R. E. J. Org.
Chem. 2003, 68, 6775-6779. (c) Mori, A.; Sekiguchi, A.; Masui, K.;
Shimada, T.; Horie, M.; Osakada, K.; Kawamoto, M.; Ikeda, T. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 1700-1701. (d) Sezen, B.; Sames, D. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2003, 125, 5274-5275.
(6) Sezen, B.; Sames, D. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 3607-3610.
(7) (a) Tan, K. L.; Bergman, R. G.; Ellman, J. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2001, 123, 2685-2686. (b) Tan, K. L.; Bergman, R. G.; Ellman, J. A. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 13964-13965. (c) Tan, K. L.; Vasudevan, A.;
Bergman, R. G.; Ellman, J. A.; Souers, A. J. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 2131-
2134.
entry
phosphine
PPh3
conversion (%)a
1
2
3
4
5
6
7b
0
26
2
30
4
P(i-Pr)3
P(t-Bu)3
P(t-Bu)2Me
Cy2P(CH2)3PCy2
PCy3
(8) Tan, K. L.; Bergman, R. G.; Ellman, J. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002,
124, 3202-3203.
31
50
(9) McGuiness et al. have shown that NHC complexes can undergo
stoichiometric oxidative addition and reductive elimination at a metal
center: (a) McGuinness, D. S.; Cavell, K. J.; Skelton, B. W.; White, A. H.
Organometallics 1999, 18, 1596-1605. (b) McGuinness, D. S.; Cavell, K.
J.; Yates, B. F.; Skelton, B. W.; White, A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001,
123, 8317-8328.
PCy3
a Conversion to 1 was monitored by GC-MS relative to hexamethyl-
benzene internal standard. b 0.4 equiv PCy3, 4 equiv Et3N, 13 h.
36
Org. Lett., Vol. 6, No. 1, 2004