Diastereomers of N-R-Phenylethyl-t-butylsulfinamide
existence of a stereogenic nitrogen atom, three stereogenic
3
centers (C, N, S) of 2 lead to 2 ) 8 possible diastereomers
(
Figure 4). As a result, one has to consider 81 × 8 ) 648
possibilities for predicting the chiroptical properties and as-
signing the absolute configuration and predominant conforma-
tions of 2. In practice, however, this number of possibilities is
reduced, as three of the orientations each for benzene and t-butyl
groups can be reduced to two, each due to the planarity of the
benzene ring and the symmetry of the t-butyl group (vide infra).
Furthermore, four diastereomers are mirror images of the other
four. Therefore it is sufficient to do calculations on four
diastereomers, each with 36 possible conformations.
FIGURE 1. t-Butanesulfinamide (1).
In the present work, two diastereomers of 2, a (+)-diastere-
omer (pSNA-2) and a (-)-diastereomer (mSNA-2) have been
synthesized in the reaction of racemic t-butanesulfinyl chloride
and (-)-(S)-R-phenylethyl amine, and their experimental chi-
roptical spectroscopic properties have been measured. Using
these experimental data, in conjunction with corresponding
density functional predictions, the absolute configuration and
predominant conformations of these two diastereomers having
the opposite absolute configurations at the stereogenic sulfinyl
sulfur atoms have been determined. Also the absolute configura-
tions at the stereogenic carbon and sulfur atoms of mSNA-2 are
independently confirmed here by determining its structure from
X-ray diffraction data.
FIGURE 2. The chemical structure of N-R-phenylethyl-t-butylsulfi-
namide (2).
applications in medicinal chemistry. Peptidosulfinamide, a
sulfinamide derivative, has found application19 for the develop-
ment of HIV protease inhibitors.
The selective induction of chirality through asymmetric
reactions necessitates not only the synthesis of enantiopure
sulfinamides, but also the reliable determination of their absolute
stereochemistry. In recent years, chiroptical spectroscopic
2
0
methods are becoming invaluable tools for reliable determi-
nation of absolute configuration and conformations of different
types of chiral molecules. This accomplishment is made possible
by the advances in instrumentation for experimental measure-
ments, and in quantum theoretical methods for theoretical
prediction, of chiroptical spectroscopic properties. The chirop-
tical spectroscopic methods used in the present study are
vibrational circular dichroism (VCD), electronic circular dichro-
ism (ECD), and optical rotatory dispersion (ORD).
It should be noted here that two diastereomers of the
sulfinamide 2 having the (R) absolute configuration at the
stereogenic sulfinyl sulfur atom have very recently been
prepared by the reduction of optically active N-t-butylsulfi-
nylimine derived from the enantiomerically pure sulfinamide
2
2a
(
R)-1 and acetophenone. They were isolated also earlier as
the products of an asymmetric addition of methylmagnesium
bromide to optically active N-t-butylsulfinylimine derived from
the enantiomerically pure sulfinamide (R)-1 and benzaldehyde.2
It should be mentioned that the structural conclusions obtained
here from chiroptical spectroscopic data and X-ray data were
not disclosed to individual research groups working on these
analyses until this manuscript was prepared. Therefore the
structural conclusions obtained from chiroptical spectroscopic
data and X-ray data are truly independent, and such independent
establishment of stereochemistry from chiroptical spectroscopic
data reflects the reliability and importance of modern day
chiroptical spectroscopies in molecular stereochemistry.
2b
Recently, we have explored the applicability of chiroptical
spectroscopic methods for structural elucidation of chiral
sulfinamides by investigating one of the simplest sulfinamides,
t-butanesulfinamide, 1 (Figure 1). Consistent and unambiguous
stereochemical assignment was obtained21 for 1 using all three
chiroptical spectroscopic methods.
N-R-Phenylethyl-t-butylsulfinamide, 2 (Figure 2) is a com-
plicated system for determining molecular stereochemistry. This
is because conformational flexibility resulting from four rotatable
4
bonds (Figure 3) leads, at least in principle, to 3 ) 81
conformers. Furthermore, if one assumes a possibility of the
Results and Discussion
(
11) Davis, F. A.; Szewczyk, J. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 5951-
As mentioned in the introduction, the presence of three
stereogenic atoms C, N, and S in 2 leads to eight possible
diastereomers. However, since four of the diastereomers are
mirror images of the other four, only one set of non-enantiomeric
diastereomers need to be investigated. This is because chiroptical
spectra of the second set of diasteromers are obtained by
multiplying those of the first set by -1. The four diastereomers
selected as theoretical models for geometry optimization and
chiroptical predictions are SSS, SRS, SSR, and SRR. The three-
letter designations represent configurational assignment at the
stereogenic atoms C, N, and S, respectively.
5
6
1, 2222-2225.
(
13) Lefebvre, I. M.; Evans, S. A. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 7532-7533.
(14) Mikolajczyk, M.; Lyzwa, P.; Drabowicz, J. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
1
997, 8 (24), 3991-3994.
15) Han, Z.; Krishnamurthy, D.; Pflum, D.; Grover, P.; Wald, S. A.;
Senanayake, C. H. Org. Lett. 2002, 4 (23), 4025-4028.
16) Moreau, P.; Essiz, M.; Merour, J.; Bouzard, D. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry. 1997, 8 (4), 591-598.
17) Clennan, E. L.; Chen, M.; Greer, A.; Jensen, F. J. Org. Chem. 1998,
3, 3397-3402.
18) Bharatam, P. V.; Kaur, A.; Kaur, D. J. Phys. Org. Chem. 2002, 15,
(
(
(
6
1
1
(
97-203.
2
1
(19) Moree, W. J.; Van der Marel, G. A.; Liskamp, R. J. J. Org. Chem.
Investigations on a smaller sulfinamide 1 revealed that
neither the geometries nor relative electronic energies are
995, 60, 5157-5169.
(20) For recent reviews, see (a) Polavarapu, P. L. Chem. Rec. 2007, 7,
1
1
25-136. (b) Polavarapu, P. L. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 2006, 106, 1809-
814.
(22) (a) Tanuwidjaja, J.; Peltier, H. M.; Ellman, J. A. J. Org. Chem.
2007, 72, 626-629. (b) Cogan, D. A.; Liu, G.; Ellman, J. A. Tetrahedron,
1999, 55, 8883-8904.
(21) Petrovic, A. G.; Polavarapu, P. L. J. Phys. Chem. A 2007, 111,
1
0938-10943.
J. Org. Chem, Vol. 73, No. 8, 2008 3121