Please cite this article in press as: Shah et al., Beyond DPPH: Use of Fluorescence-Enabled Inhibited Autoxidation to Predict Oxidative Cell Death
2
Di-tert-undecyl Hyponitrite (DTUN). An oven dried 25 mL round-bottom flask and stir bar were cooled under N atmosphere and
charged with 2-iodo-2-methyldecane (1.44g, 6 mmol) followed by degassed anhydrous methylene chloride (10 mL). The flask
was completely wrapped in aluminum foil to exclude light and then cooled thoroughly in an ice bath. Freshly dried silver hyponitrite
(
1.24 g, 4.5 mmol) was added in three portions over 5 min with vigorous stirring. The ice bath was then removed and NMR analysis
indicated consumption of the tertiary iodide usually within 10-20 min. The reaction mixture was then re-cooled in an ice bath and
diluted with cold pentane (10 mL) before filtering over celite. The filtrate was concentrated on a rotary evaporator without heating
2
followed by hivac for about 5 min while on ice. The residual oil was crystallized overnight from methanol (ca. 20 mL, N purged)
on dry ice. The majority of supernatant was then removed by syringe, discarded, and the solid washed with three portions of cold
methanol in the same manner. The solid was allowed to thaw into a small volume of methanol (ca. 5 mL) until a solution formed.
The product was promptly isolated thereafter while being kept cold on ice at all times. The solution was extracted with three portions
2 4
of cold pentane (5 mL), the combined pentane extracts washed once with 1:1 methanol:water, dried over Na SO , filtered, concen-
trated on a rotary evaporator without heating followed by high vacuum to yield DTUN (270 mg, 24%) as a colourless wax. The product
when free from residual solvent is solid on ice and rapidly melts when allowed to warm to ambient temperature. The solid was ali-
ꢀ
quoted by Pasteur pipette into tared vials and the vials were stored at -78 C. Stocks up to 0.2 M were prepared in ethanol or chlo-
1
robenzene and held on ice or dry ice just prior to use. H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl
3
) d 1.65 (m, 2H), 1.34 (s, 6H), 1.34-1.24 (m, 12H), 0.88 (t,
1
3
3
J = 6.6 Hz, 3H). C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl ) d 83.42, 40.63, 32.03, 30.16, 29.69, 29.42, 25.94, 24.02, 22.82, 14.27. FTIR (ATR) n: 988,
ꢁ
1
+
1
147, 1368, 1384, 1466, 2854, 2923 cm . HRMS: m/z Calc: C11
Synthesis of Phenols
,6-Diethylhydroquinone. A 100mL double neck round bottom flask was charged with glacial acetic acid (35mL), concentrated sul-
furic acid (0.4 mL) and 2,6-diethylphenol (3.89g; 25.9mmol). With mixing, 30% H (13mL) was add by dropping funnel. While moni-
23 2 2
H23 (EI: M-C11H N O ) 155.1794 Found: 155.1787.
2
2
O
2
toring the temperature of the solution with an alcohol thermometer (affixed through side neck) the mixture was gradually heated to
ꢀ
5
0 C (heat gun) after which the reaction was sufficiently exothermic to maintain its temperature. The reaction was kept between 55
ꢀ
and 65 C for ꢂ30 minutes after which the heat of the reaction subsided until cooling to room temperature. The reaction was poured
into water and extracted with ethyl acetate three times. The combined organic extracts were rinsed three times with 1M NaOH so-
lution, and subsequently dried with MgSO
40mL) and transferred to a 250mL round bottom flask charged with methanol (25mL), water (90mL), and sodium dithionite (13g). The
flask was sealed, evacuated, and backfilled with N and left to stir overnight. The ether was then separated, and the aqueous phases
was extracted with ether. The combined organic solutions were subsequently dried with MgSO , filtered, and concentrated under
reduced pressure. The product was isolated by column chromatography (30% EtOAc in hexanes) and recrystallized out of hexanes
4
, filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was dissolved into ether
(
2
4
ꢀ
1
affording 2,6-diethylhydroquinone as white needles (1.00g, 23.2%); mp 90-92 C; H NMR (400 MHz; DMSO-d
6
): d 8.49 (s, 1H), 7.32
13
(
s, 1H), 6.32 (s, 2H), 2.48 (q, J = 7.5 Hz, 4H), 1.08 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 6H); H NMR (101 MHZ; DMSO-d ): d 150.2, 144.2, 131.93, 112.7, 23.0,
6
1
4.38; HRMS (EI, magnetic sector): calcd for C10
14 2
H O 166.0993, found 166.1007.
2,6-Diethyl-4-methoxyphenol (16). Methanol (15mL) and 2,6-diethylhydroquionone (0.95g; 5.7mmol) were placed in a 100mL round
bottom flask equipped with a stir bar and reflux condenser. Carefully, 4.5mL of concentrated sulfuric acid was added and the reaction
mixture was heated to reflux for ꢂ4 hours. Once cooled the, the reaction mixture was poured into water followed by extraction with
4
ether (three times). The combined organic extracts were dried with MgSO , filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The
product was isolated by column chromatography (10% EtOAc in hexanes). Two recrystallizations out of hexanes (minimum of hex-
anes at room temperature, followed by chilling on dry ice resulted in rapid crystallization) afforded the 2,6-diethyl-4-methoxyphenol
ꢀ
as white needles (0.39g, 38%); mp 34-36 C; 1H NMR (400 MHz; DMSO-d6): d 7.58 (s, 1H), 6.49 (s, 2H), 3.65 (s, 3H), 2.54 (q, J = 7.5 Hz,
4
H), 1.10 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 6H). 13C NMR (101 MHz; DMSO-d6): d 152.5, 145.6, 132.0, 111.6, 55.1, 23.2, 14.4; HRMS (EI, magnetic
sector): calcd for C11H16O2 180.1150, found 180.1140.
,6-Diisopropylhydroquinone. The same general procedure for the preparation of 2,6-diethylhydroquinone was used in the prep-
2
aration of 2,6-diisopropylhydroquinone from 2,6-diisopropylphenol (6.04g; 33.9mmol). The product was isolated by column chroma-
tography (30% EtOAc in hexanes) and recrystallized out of hexanes affording 2,6-diisopropylhydroquinone as white leaflets (1.34g,
ꢀ
2
0.4%); mp 94-96 C; 1H NMR (400 MHz; DMSO-d6): d 8.49 (s, 1H), 7.26 (s, 1H), 6.37 (s, 2H), 3.23 (sept., J = 6.9 Hz, 2H), 1.10 (d, J =
.9 Hz, 12H); 13C NMR (101 MHz; DMSO-d6): d 150.7, 142.75, 136.9, 109.4, 26.2, 23.0; HRMS (EI, magnetic sector): calcd for
6
C12H18O2 194.1306, found 194.1297.
2
,6-Diisopropyl-4-methoxyphenol (17). Methanol (20mL) and 2,6-diisopropylhydroquionone (1.25g; 6.4mmol) were placed in a
00mL round bottom flask equipped with a stir bar and reflux condenser. Carefully, 6mL of concentrated sulfuric acid was added
1
and the reaction mixture was heated to reflux for ꢂ4 hours. Once cooled the, the reaction mixture was poured into water followed
by extraction with ether (three times). The combined organic extracts were dried with MgSO , filtered, and concentrated under
reduced pressure. The product was isolated by column chromatography (10% EtOAc in hexanes). After drying under vacuum, the
4
ꢀ
ꢀ
residue was chilled (-20 C) affording 2,6-diisopropyl-4-methoxyphenol as a beige crystalline solid (1.06g, 79.5%); mp 48-50 C;
H NMR (400 MHz; DMSO-d6): d 7.53 (s, 1H), 6.51 (s, 2H), 3.66 (s, 3H), 3.28 (sept, J = 6.9 Hz, 2H), 1.13 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 12H); 13C
NMR (101 MHz; DMSO-d6): d 153.0, 144.2, 136.9, 108.3, 55.0, 26.4, 22.9. HRMS (EI, magnetic sector): calcd for C13H20O2
08.1463, found 208.1487.
1
2
e6 Cell Chemical Biology 26, 1–14.e1–e7, November 21, 2019