1135
of CO2 in CH3CN/H2O (4:1 v/v) containing 0.1 M of TBAPF6
for 0.5 h produced CO (0.9 ¯mol), HCOOH (0.3 ¯mol), and H2
(1 ¯mol) with current efficiencies 30, 10, and 30%, respectively,
but the cathodic currents dramatically decreased within 0.5 h.
Scanning electron micrographs (SEM) of the 1/GC showed
rough granular surface compared to those of unmodified GC
(Figure S39). After electrochemical reduction of CO2 using the
1/GC, the SEM images revealed disappearance of the rough
granular surface in some part of the modified region due to
partial detachment of the multilayer film from the GC surface.
On the other hand, [2](PF6)2 (1.0 mM) worked stably as a
catalyst in electrochemical CO2 reduction and produced CO and
HCOOH at ¹1.70 V in CH3CN/H2O. Detachment of the multi-
layer film from the 1/GC surface in the present study, therefore,
may be caused mainly by collapse of the surface structure of
the GC plate rather than degradation of the metal complex
and fragmentation of the multilayer films during the CO2
reduction. Taking into account achievement of a high current
density (6 mA cm¹1) of 1/GC in the electrochemical CO2
reduction under 20 atm of CO2, methodological developments
to depress detachment of redox active catalysts from electrode
surfaces may open a new area in a utilization of CO2 as a C1
resource.
¹1
Figure 2. (a) CV of 1/GC (S = 0.071 cm2) at 10 mV s in
CH3CN containing 0.1 M Bu4NPF6 in a potential region from
¹0.80 to ¹1.40 V (blue line) and from ¹0.80 to ¹1.75 V (red
line) under N2; (b) under N2 (black line), under 1 atm of CO2
(red line), and under 20 atm of CO2 (blue line) in a potential
region to ¹1.75 V.
(Figure 2a).6 The IR reflection absorption spectroscopy (IRRAS)
of the modified electrode 1/GC showed characteristic peaks
at 2009 and 862 cm assignable to ¯(C≡O) and ¯(PF6 ),
respectively, whereas any bands associated with ¯(N¸N)
completely disappeared (Figure S19). These results demonstrate
the retention of Ru(bpy)(trpy)(CO) framework on the surface of
the carbon electrode.
¹1
¹
The closed-packed monolayer coverage (Γ) of the complex
¹10
on a perfectly flat surface is estimated to be ca. 1.6 © 10
We thank Mr. Takuya Iizuka and Dr. Shin-ichi Kimura
(IMS) for IRRAS measurements and Mr. Satoru Nakao (IMS)
for SEM measurements. This work was supported by the Grant-
in-Aid for Scientific Research on Priority Areas (No. 20002005)
from Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and
Technology, Japan.
¹2
mol cm based on the crystal structure of the amino derivative
[3](PF6)2 determined by X-ray analysis (Figure S29). An actual
¹8
coverage (Γ) of the complex was calculated as 3.1 © 10
¹2
mol cm from the area of the cathodic (and anodic) wave.
The Γ value decreased only to 2 © 10¹9 mol cm even when a
¹2
highly oriented pyrolytic graphite (HOPG) with a basal plane
was used in place of a GC plate, indicating formation of a multi-
layer film consisting of the Ru(bpy)(trpy)(CO) unit, as reported
somewhere.8 The multilayer film would be formed by a
repetitive attack of Ru(trpy-ph•) generated in the irreversible
reduction of [Ru(bpy)(trpy-ph-N2+)(CO)]3+ to carbon on bpy or
trpy of the adsorbed Ru(bpy)(trpy-ph)(CO) complexes on the
carbon surface by considering that bpy would be located at the
most outside layer of the modified film. An electrografting
polyfilm, therefore, would consist almost entirely of an Ru(trpy-
aryl)(bpy-Ru) bridge.
References and Notes
1
a) J. P. Collman, N. K. Devaraj, R. A. Decréau, Y. Yang, Y.-L.
Yan, W. Ebina, T. A. Eberspacher, C. E. D. Chidsey, Science
Brennaman, P. G. Hoertz, A. O. T. Patrocinio, N. Y. M. Iha, J. L.
a) T. W. Woolerton, S. Sheard, E. Reisner, E. Pierce, S. W.
2
3
4
a) N. J. Brewer, S. Janusz, K. Critchley, S. D. Evans, G. J.
Kastenberg, F. C. J. M. van Veggel, D. N. Reinhoudt, Langmuir
The anodic peak of the E1/2 = ¹1.25 V redox couple
disappeared after the potential sweep is expanded to ¹1.75 V
(Figure 2a). It is worthy of note that the CVof the homogeneous
solution containing the analogous [Ru(bpy)(trpy)(CO)]2+ [2]2+
¹•
5
6
a) D. Evrard, F. Lambert, C. Policar, V. Balland, B. Limoges,
in the same solvent exhibits one reversible (trpy/trpy ) redox
couple at ¹1.33 V and one irreversible cathodic peak of the
¹•
(bpy/bpy ) wave at ¹1.69 V that is caused by cleavage of the
Ru-CO bond of [2]0.6 The disappearance of anodic wave (trpy/
¹•
trpy ) of the 1/GC after the potential sweep to ¹1.75 V,
therefore, is associated with the Ru-CO bond cleavage caused
by successive trpy and bpy localized reductions. The cathodic
currents of the 1/GC increased at potentials more negative than
7
8
9
B. Jousselme, G. Bidan, M. Billon, C. Goyer, Y. Kervella, S.
Guillerez, E. A. Hamad, C. Goze-Bac, J.-Y. Mevellec, S. Lefrant,
Supporting Information is available electronically on the CSJ-
html.
¹•
the irreversible cathodic (bpy/bpy ) wave under 1 atm of CO2.
Furthermore, irreversible cathodic currents increased sixfold
when the CV was measured under 20 atm of CO2 (Figure 2b),
indicating that the rate-determining step of the present electro-
chemical CO2 reduction involves CO2 attack at the Ru center.
¹8
Controlled-potential electrolysis using the 1/GC (5 © 10
mol, surface area S = 2 cm2) at ¹1.70 (vs. Ag/Ag+) under 1 atm
Chem. Lett. 2010, 39, 1134-1135
© 2010 The Chemical Society of Japan