E. Çiftçi et al.
Polyhedron 208 (2021) 115419
Tensor 27 FT–IR spectrometer with KBr pellets in the range 400–4000
cmꢀ 1. Elemental analyses (CHN) were performed on a Perkin-Elmer
2400C Elemental Analyzer. Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) patterns
3435 (m), 3122 (w), 3061 (s), 3001 (w), 2925 (w), 1724 (vs), 1666 (vs),
1629 (s), 1494 (m), 1442 (m), 1381 (m), 1178 (m), 1122 (m), 896 (w),
800 (w), 761 (m), 680 (m), 561 (w) (Fig. S1). 1H NMR (500 MHz, D2O) δ,
ppm: 9.05 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 4H), 8.78 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 4H), 7.78 (d, J = 8.3
Hz, 4H), 7.59 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 4H), 5.92 (s, 4H).
were collected with a Rikagu Smartlab X-ray diffractometer using Cu-K
α
radiation (λ = 1.5406 nm), operating at 40 kV and 30 mA, in the 2θ
range 5–40 ◦. Thermal analyses were carried out on a Perkin Elmer
Diamond TG/DTA Thermal Analyzer with a heating rate of 10 ◦C/min in
a dry air atmosphere. Diffuse reflectance spectra (DRS) in the wave-
length range 200–800 nm were taken on a Shimadzu UV-2600 spec-
trophotometer using BaSO4 as a reference. The 1H NMR spectrum of
H2bipnaBr2 was recorded on a Jeol ECZ 500R spectrometer at room
temperature. Topological analyses were performed using ToposPro
software [25]. Diffraction data of complexes 1–4 were collected on a
2.3. Synthesis of complexes 1–4
2.3.1. [MnCl(µ-bipna)]NO3⋅2H2On (1)
A mixture of H2bipnaBr2 (0.040 g, 0.068 mmol) and Mn(NO3)2⋅6H2O
(0.036 g, 0.30 mmol) was sonicated at room temperature for 30 min in a
mixture of DMF-ethanol (1:1, v:v) in the presence of two drops of 6 M
HCl. The resulting mixture was transferred into a 5 mL closed capped
glass bottle and heated at 60 ◦C for one day to obtain crystals. The
crystals were washed with a DMF-ethanol mixture and dried at room
temperature. Yield: 58% (based on H2bipnaBr2). Anal. Calcd. for
C26H24N3O9ClMn: C, 50.95; H, 3.95; N, 6.86 %. Found: C, 50.11; H,
3.90; N, 6.22 %. FT-IR (KBr, cmꢀ 1): 3423 (m), 3057 (w), 2929 (w), 1670
(vs), 1404 (vs), 1385 (vs), 1198 (m), 1128 (m), 835 (m), 768 (m), 687
(m), 555 (m), 433 (m) (Fig. S2).
Bruker Smart Apex II CCD equipped with MoKα radiation (λ = 0.71073
Å). The structures were solved by SHELT and refined by full-matrix
least-squares on all F2 data using SHELXL in conjunction with the
OLEX2 graphical user interface [26,27]. The solvent masking protocol
inside OLEX2 was applied to remove the diffraction contribution from
highly disordered solvent molecules using a void probe radius of 1.2 Å. A
solvent mask was calculated and 196 electrons in a volume of 1032 Å3
for 1, 212 electrons in a volume of 3010 Å3 for 2, and 236 electrons in a
volume of 1080 Å3 for 3 were found in a void per unit cell. These results
are consistent with the presence of approximately two water molecules
per unit cell. The number of solvent molecules seemed to be higher due
to the disorder. According to TG and elemental analysis, the compounds
contained about two water molecules. For all complexes, the anisotropic
thermal parameters were refined for non-hydrogen atoms and hydrogen
atoms were calculated and refined with a riding model. Molecule
drawings were developed with the Mercury program [28].
2.3.2. [CoCl2(µ-bipna)]n⋅2H2On (2)
The synthetic procedure for 2 was similar to that for 1, except Co
(NO3)2 6H2O (0.060 g, 0.30 mmol) was used instead of Mn(NO3)2⋅6H2O
Yield: 93% (based on H2bipnaBr2). Anal. Calcd. for C26H24N2O6Cl2Co: C,
52.90; H, 4.10; N, 4.75 %. Found: C, 52.98; H, 4.53; N, 7.23%. FT-IR
(KBr, cmꢀ 1): 3426 (m), 3065 (w), 2928 (w), 1653 (vs), 1616 (vs),
1497 (w), 1373 (s), 1186 (m), 1094 (m), 766 (m), 691 (m), 551 (m) 422
(m) (Fig. S3).
2.3.3. [CuCl(µ -bipna)]BF42H2On (3)
2.1. Synthesis of 4,4′-bis(bromomethyl)biphenyl
4
The synthetic procedure for 3 was similar to that for 1, except Cu
(BF4)2 xH2O (0.036 g, 0.30 mmol) was used instead of Mn(NO3)2⋅6H2O
4,4′-Dimethylbiphenyl (1.82 g, 10 mmol), N-bromosuccinimide
(3.54 g, 20 mmol) and benzoyl peroxide (0.06 g, 0.25 mmol) were
dissolved in 20 mL of benzene and refluxed at 95 ◦C for 12 h. The re-
action mixture was filtered and the solution was cooled to room tem-
perature. The resulting precipitates were collected by filtration, washed
with an ethanol/hexane mixture and dried under vacuum, resulting in
4,4′-bis(bromomethyl)biphenyl as a white powder (54% yield) (Scheme
S1).
Yield:
51%
(based
on
H2bipnaBr2).
Anal.
Calcd.
for
C
26H24BN2O6F4ClCu, 48.32; H, 3.74; N, 4.11 %. Found: C, 47.75; H,
3.70; N, 4.34 %. FT-IR (KBr, cmꢀ 1): 3426 (m), 3101 (w), 3065 (w), 2934
(w), 1660 (vs), 1499 (w), 1414 (s), 1207 (m), 1074 (s), 835 (w), 766 (m),
688 (m), 486 (m) (Fig. S4).
2.3.4. {[CuCl(µ4-bipna)]ClO4‧2H2On (4)
The synthetic procedure for 4 was similar to that for 3, except Cu
(ClO4)26H2O (0.060 g, 0.30 mmol) was used of Cu(BF4)2 xH2O. Yield:
91% (based on H2bipnaBr2). Anal. Calcd. for C26H24N2O10Cl2Cu, 47.39;
H, 3.67; N, 4.25 %. Found: C, 47.06; H, 3.74; N, 4.79 %. FT-IR (KBr,
cmꢀ 1): 3419 (m), 3140 (w), 3096 (w), 3063 (w), 2935 (w), 1661 (vs),
1499 (w), 1414 (w), 1207 (s), 1115 (s), 1092 (s), 833 (w), 766 (m), 688
(m), 623 (m), 484 (m) (Fig. S5).
2.2. Synthesis of 1,1′-biphenyl-4,4′-diylbis(methylene)bis(3-
carboxypyridin-1-ium) dibromide (H2bipnaBr2)
A solution of 4,4′-bis(bromomethyl)biphenyl (0.68 g, 2.0 mmol) in
DMF (5 mL) was added dropwise to a solution of nicotinic acid (0.49 g,
4.0 mmol) in DMF (20 mL). After the mixture had been stirred at 70 ◦C
for 6 h, the resulting precipitates were collected by filtration, washed
with DMF and diethyl ether, and then dried in vacuum, resulting in
H2bipna as a white powder (52% yield) (Scheme S1). IR (KBr, cmꢀ 1):
Scheme 1. Molecular structure of 1,1′-([1,1′-biphenyl]-4,4′-diylbis(methylene))bis(3-carboxypyridin-1-ium) bromide (H2bipnaBr2).
2