R. Sahay et al. / Journal of Solid State Chemistry 186 (2012) 261–267
267
5. Conclusions
The effect of the dwelling time of the annealing cycle for the
formation of the crystallite CuO nanofibers was analyzed. It was
observed that the crystallite size of CuO nanofibers decreased
with an increase in the dwelling time. This decrease in the
crystallite size resulted in the improved orientation of the CuO
nanofibers. The highly ordered morphology obtained at 12 h was
employed for photo-catalytic study. It was noted that 60% of the
organic dye was decomposed within 1 h of UV illumination.
Preliminary results based on the study on the suitability of CuO
nanofibers as the blocking layer in ZnO based DSSC was also
presented. A 25% increase in the current density was observed
with the application of CuO as blocking layer. We have hereby
fabricated highly crystalline CuO nanofibers with possible energy
applications.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by Singapore NRF-CRP grant on
‘‘Nanonets for Harnessing Solar Energy and Storage’’ and also
NUS and NTU for providing facilities to carry out the research.
Dr. V. Thavasi acknowledges NUSNNI for support.
Fig. 9. Photocurrent density–voltage characteristics of DSSCs.
Reference
[1] J.R. Hayes, G.W. Nyce, J.D. Kuntz, J.H. Satcher, A.V. Hamza, Nanotechnology 18
(2007) 275602.
[2] A.H. Jayatissa, K. Guo, A.C. Jayasuriya, Appl. Surf. Sci. 255 (2009) 9474–9479.
[3] H.G. Yu, J.G. Yu, S.W. Liu, S. Mann, Chem. Mater. 19 (2007) 4327–4334.
[4] V. Figueiredo, E. Elangovan, G. Gonc-alves, N. Franco, E. Alves, S.H.K. Park,
R. Martins, E. Fortunato, Phys. Status Solidi A 206 (2009) 2143–2148.
[5] Y. Xi, C. Hu, P. Gao, R. Yang, X. He, X. Wang, B. Wan, Mater. Sci. Eng. B 166
(2009) 113–117.
Table 1
Device characteristics of ZnO based DSSCs in the presence of CuO.
Configuration
Voc
Jsc
FF
Efficiency
(%)
(mV)
(mA/cmꢂ2
)
[6] T. Maruyama, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 56 (1998) 85–92.
[7] M.A. Dar, Y.S. Kim, W.B. Kim, J.M. Sohn, H.S. Shin, Appl. Surf. Sci. 254 (2008)
7477–7481.
[8] S.C. Ray, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 68 (2001) 307–312.
[9] L. Chen, S. Shet, H.W. Tang, H.L. Wang, T. Deutsch, Y.F. Yan, J. Turner, M. Al-
Jassim, J. Mater. Chem. 20 (2010) 6962–6967.
[10] P. Bera, A.L. Camara, A. Hornes, A. Martinez-Arias, J. Phys. Chem. C 113 (2009)
10689–10695.
[11] M.A. Dar, S.H. Nam, Y.S. Kim, W.B. Kim, J. Solid State Electrochem. 14 (2010)
1719–1726.
FTO/ZnO/N719/
electrolyte/Pt
0.399
0.439
0.283
0.332
0.643
0.787
0.089
0.092
0.381
0.439
0.512
0.609
0.098
0.152
0.013
0.019
FTO/ZnO/CuO/N719/
electrolyte/Pt
FTO/ZnO/Eosin-Y/
electrolyte/Pt
FTO/ZnO/CuO/Eosin-
Y/electrolyte/Pt
[12] K.P. Musselman, A. Wisnet, D.C. Iza, H.C. Hesse, C. Scheu, J.L. MacManus-
Driscoll, L. Schmidt-Mende, Adv. Mater. 22 (2010) E254–258.
[13] J.J. Chen, K. Wang, L. Hartman, W.L. Zhou, J. Phys. Chem. C 112 (2008)
16017–16021.
[14] D.H. Reneker, A.L. Yarin, Polymer 49 (2008) 2387–2425.
[15] C.J. Thompson, G.G. Chase, A.L. Yarin, D.H. Reneker, Polymer 48 (2007)
6913–6922.
[16] M. Miyauchi, A. Nakajima, T. Watanabe, K. Hashimoto, Chem. Mater. 14
(2002) 2812–2816.
[17] G.H. Li, N.M. Dimitrijevic, L. Chen, T. Rajh, K.A. Gray, J. Phys. Chem. C 112
(2008) 19040–19044.
[18] B. Rohe, R. Weiss, S. Vukojevic, C. Baltes, M. Muhler, M. Tausch, M. Epple, Eur.
J. Inorg. Chem. (2007) 1723–1727.
[19] A. Nezamzadeh-Ejhieh, S. Hushmandrad, Appl. Catal. A 388 (2010) 149–159.
[20] J.Y. Kim, S. Lee, J.H. Noh, H.S. Jung, K.S. Hong, J. Electroceram. 23 (2009) 422–425.
[21] D.H. Reneker, A.L. Yarin, H. Fong, S. Koombhongse, J. Appl. Phys. 87 (2000)
4531–4547.
implying the reduction of series resistance. Similarly, Rsh repre-
sents the obstruction to an alternate path for the flow of current,
which can be deduced by inverse of the slope at the Isc. High value
of Rsh implied that the series resistance was the major reason for
lower current density. As expected, the highest current density
was obtained for the cells having lower series resistance. Lower
series resistance was realized by incorporating CuO as a blocking
layer which restricted the recombination electron–hole pairs
leading to relatively high current density. The difference in the
current density for N719 and Eosin-Y can be explained on the
basis of carboxylate anchoring group. The carboxylate anchoring
group was the cause for the grafting of the sensitizer on to the
ZnO surface [27]. Two carboxylate anchoring groups in N719
compared to one for Eosin-Y resulted in improved grafting of
sensitizer and thus resulted in the improved current density for
N719 dye. Work is still in the process to further improve the
efficiency of solar cells and analyze the scattering nature of the
poly-crystalline CuO nanofiber blocking layer.
[22] S.J. Stewart, M. Multigner, J.F. Marco, F.J. Berry, A. Hernando, J.M. Gonzalez,
Solid State Commun. 130 (2004) 247–251.
[23] Y. Iijima, N. Niimura, K. Hiraoka, Surf. Interface Anal. 24 (1996) 193–197.
[24] G. Kliche, Z.V. Popovic, Phys. Rev. B 42 (1990) 10060–10066.
[25] T. Ito, H. Yamaguchi, K. Okabe, T. Masumi, J. Mater. Sci. 33 (1998) 3555–3566.
[26] J. Tang, L. Brzozowski, D.A.R. Barkhouse, X.H. Wang, R. Debnath, R. Wolowiec,
E. Palmiano, L. Levina, A.G. Pattantyus-Abraham, D. Jamakosmanovic,
E.H. Sargent, ACS Nano 4 (2010) 869–878.
[27] M. Gratzel, MRS Bulletin 30 (2005) 23–27.