P. Mertens et al. / Journal of Catalysis 243 (2006) 7–13
13
able in the one-step transformation, combined with yields of the
desired menthol up to 76%.
the Lewis acid site is embedded in the pore wall, it may dis-
play unusual stereoselectivity. This has been well documented
for the Meerwein reduction of 4-t-butylcyclohexanone in zeo-
lite beta [23]; similar effects may be invoked here to explain the
increased stereoselectivity to isopulegol 2a. The postsynthesis
catalyst treatment eventually resulted in a menthol stereoselec-
tivity of 88% and a menthol yield of 85%.
Several factors seem to be essential in obtaining this re-
sult. First, the Pt discriminates quite well between disubstituted
C=C double bonds, as in pulegols, and trisubstituted bonds,
as in citronellal, which are only slowly hydrogenated. This is
reminiscent of, for example, the chemoselective hydrogenation
of limonene on Pt/C, in which only the exocyclic disubstituted
bond reacts [14]. A metal like Pd is much less suitable for real-
izing such chemoselectivity, because Pd facilitates double-bond
isomerization. Because the C=C bond in citronellal is hardly
hydrogenated on a 2 wt% Pt catalyst, there is sufficient time
for the ene-like cyclization to proceed. The pulegol isomeriza-
tion products 2a → 2d have a disubstituted double bond and
are much more prone to hydrogenation, leading eventually to
the desired menthol isomers 3.
Acknowledgments
P.M. thanks the IWT for financial support. This work was
performed in the frame of the Belgian Interuniversity Poles of
Attraction (IUAP V-3). D.D.V. is grateful to the FWO for grant
G.0323.04. The authors thank Xingpu Ye for assistance with
the TEM characterization of the catalysts.
References
Second, the catalyst also discriminates well between C=C
hydrogenation in the pulegols and the undesired C=O hydro-
genation in citronellal. This is essential to avoid citronellol
formation from citronellal. Indeed, Pt is known to be a suit-
able catalyst for C=O hydrogenation only when specific com-
pounds, such as Fe3+ or Sn4+, are used in the support ma-
terial or as a promotor [14,19]. Only when using the 5 wt%
Pt catalyst was an unexpectedly pronounced C=O hydrogena-
tion observed (Table 2, entry 9). Although this can be due in
part to the relative amounts of acid and hydrogenating func-
tions, one should also consider that the 5 wt% catalyst contains
the largest and most aggregated Pt particles. This seems to in-
dicate that large particles more readily hydrogenate the C=O
bonds. A similar enhanced selectivity for C=O hydrogenation
on large Pt metal particles (>6 nm) with flat surfaces in the
selective hydrogenation of cinnamaldehyde to cinnamyl alco-
hol has been reported by Gallezot et al. [20]. For the Pt/H-beta
catalysts with lower Pt content and smaller particle size, direct
C=O hydrogenation can be limited, which directs the overall
reaction toward cyclic products.
Third, choosing appropriate solvents helps obtain high se-
lectivities. For instance, alcohols are less suitable because they
are the typical solvents for selective C=O reduction in the pres-
ence of C=C bonds. In 1,4-dioxane, the rates of the consecutive
reactions seem well tuned to give high menthol yields.
Finally, a further stereoselectivity increase was obtained af-
ter high-temperature treatment of the bifunctional beta cat-
alyst under inert atmosphere. There is ample spectroscopic
and physicochemical evidence to indicate that high-temperature
treatment of beta zeolites, possibly in combination with steam,
converts pseudotetrahedral or pseudooctohedral species [e.g.,
(H2O)Al(OSi)3 or (H2O)3Al(OSi)3] to framework Lewis acid
sites [e.g., Al(OSi)3 or Al(OSi)2OH] [21–23]. Temperatures
well above 450 ◦C seem to be required for this process. Because
[1] J. Fleischer, K. Bauer, R. Hopp, DE 2109456, Haarmann & Reimer, 1971.
[2] S. Otsuka, K. Tani, T. Yamagata, S. Akutagawa, H. Kumobayashi,
M. Yagi, EP 68506, Takasago, 1972.
[3] N. Ravasio, N. Poli, R. Psaro, M. Saba, F. Zaccheria, Top. Catal. 213
(2000) 195.
[4] C. Milone, C. Gangemi, R. Ingoglia, G. Neri, S. Galvagno, Appl. Catal.
A 184 (1999) 89.
[5] C. Milone, C. Gangemi, G. Neri, A. Pistone, S. Galvagno, Appl. Catal.
A 199 (2000) 239.
[6] A.F. Trasarti, A.J. Marchi, C.R. Apesteguia, J. Catal. 224 (2004) 484.
[7] P. Mäki-Arvela, N. Kumar, D. Kubicka, A. Nasir, T. Heikkilä, V.-P. Lehto,
R. Sjöholm, T. Salmi, D.Yu. Murzin, J. Mol. Catal. A 240 (2005) 72.
[8] M.G. White, Heterogeneous Catalysis, Prentice–Hall, Englewood Cliffs,
NJ, 1991, 88.
[9] Y. Nakatani, K. Kawashima, Synthesis (1978) 147.
[10] V.K. Aggarwal, G.P. Vennall, P.N. Davey, C. Newman, Tetrahedron
Lett. 39 (1998).
[11] T. Iwata, Y. Okeda, Y. Hori, Eur. Pat. Appl. EP 12251632 A2, 2002.
[12] P. Maki-Arvela, N. Kumar, V. Nieminen, R. Sjöholm, T. Salmi, D.Yu.
Murzin, J. Catal. 225 (2004) 155.
[13] F. Iosif, S. Coman, V. Pârvulescu, P. Grange, S. Delsarte, D. De Vos, P. Ja-
cobs, Chem. Commun. (2004) 1292.
[14] S. Nishimura, Handbook of Heterogeneous Catalytic Hydrogenation for
Organic Synthesis, Wiley, New York, 2001.
[15] G.K. Chuach, S.H. Liu, S. Jaenicke, L.J. Harrison, J. Catal. 200 (2001)
352.
[16] Z. Yongzhong, N. Yuntong, S. Jaenicke, G.K. Chuach, J. Catal. 229 (2005)
404.
[17] T.A. Peters, N.E. Benes, A. Holmen, J.T.F. Keurentjes, Appl. Catal. A 297
(2006) 182.
[18] A. Corma, M. Renz, Chem. Commun. (2004) 550.
[19] V. Ponec, Appl. Catal. A 149 (1997) 27.
[20] A. Giroir-Fendler, D. Richard, P. Gallezot, Catal. Lett. 5 (1990) 175.
[21] G.H. Kuehl, H.K.C. Timken, Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 35–36 (2000)
521.
[22] J.A. van Bokhoven, D.C. Koningsberger, P. Kunkeler, H. van Bekkum,
J. Catal. 211 (2002) 540.
[23] P.J. Kunkeler, B.J. Zuurdeeg, J.C. van der Waal, J.A. van Bokhoven, D.C.
Koningsberger, H. van Bekkum, J. Catal. 180 (1998) 234.