New Urinary Metabolite of CS2
Chem. Res. Toxicol., Vol. 14, No. 9, 2001 1279
TTCG/T3CA were plotted against their molar ratios (x) to obtain
using UV detection, it is particularly important to
separate TTCA from several other UV absorbing compo-
nents of urine. Solvent extraction of TTCA, a carboxylic
acid, from acidified urine is commonly used. Recovery
with ethyl acetate was reported to be less than 50% (8),
although the yield can be increased by using multiple
extractions with ether (9).
straight lines given by the equations 0.1301 + 1.026x (R2
)
0.998) for TTCA and 0.011 + 1.257x (R2 ) 0.999) for TTCG.
From the peak area ratios of the analyzed samples TTCA and
TTCG in nmoles per 0.5 mL of urine were calculated.
Id en tifica tion of TTCG in Ur in e of Ra ts Tr ea ted w ith
CS2. Urine collected from rats treated with CS2 (see below) was
pooled (∼25 mL), washed with ethyl acetate (2 × 10 mL),
acidified to pH 2, and saturated with salt. It was vigorously
stirred with ethyl acetate (20 mL) for 10 min, centrifuged at
8000 rpm for 10 min, and the organic layer removed. The
supernatants from four such extractions were combined, dried,
and evaporated. The residue was coevaporated with absolute
ethanol (3 × 5 mL), dissolved in 2 mL of the same solvent, and
heated at 70 °C with BF3-OEt2 for 1 h. The residue after the
removal of solvent was purified on a column of silica (80-0%
hexanes-ethyl acetate). The fractions producing spots on TLC
(ethyl acetate) with an Rf of 0.2-0.8 were collected, concen-
trated, and analyzed by HPLC (column: Xterra MS column 2.1
× 100 mm (3.5 µm particle size) with a 2.1 × 10 mm guard
cartridge; flow rate 200 µL/min; isocratic elution 20% acetonitrile
in 5 mM formic acid). A peak with an identical retention time
and UV spectrum to the ethyl ester of TTCG was analyzed by
using a Finnigan TSQ 7000 mass spectrometer (with electro-
spray ionization) and found to produce the same molecular ion
of 249 (M + H)+ and daughter ions of 203 (M - OC2H5) and
175 (203 - CO) observed for the ethyl ester of TTCG.
An im a ls. This study was performed in accordance with the
National Institutes of Health’s Guide for Care and Use of
Laboratory Animals, and was approved by the Institutional
animal care committee. For animal experiments, male Sprague
Dawley rats, 7-9 weeks old and 230-300 g (Harlan, India-
napolis, IN) were used. Rats were housed in a room on a diurnal
light cycle, and while in metabolic cages given finely ground
rodent chow and water ad libitum.
Carbon Disulfide Exposures. Prior to CS2 administration, five
groups of male rats (n ) 3/group) were placed into metabolic
cages for 24 h. A 24 h urine collection was obtained as control
urine and was spun for 5 min at 4000g and frozen at -20 °C
prior to TTCA analysis. Next, each group was administered one
dose of CS2 in corn oil by gavage. Groups 1-5 received 0.04,
0.20, 1.0, 3.0, and 5.0 mmol of CS2/kg, respectively. The rats
were placed back in their metabolic cages and a 24 h urine
sample was collected the next day.
Captan, MITC, and TTCG Exposures. Male rats (n ) 3) were
placed in metabolic cages and control urine collected for 24 h.
A single dose of either MITC (0.1 mmol/kg by i.p. injection using
40 mM MITC in 1,2-propanediol), TTCG (0.4 mmol/kg by i.p.
injection using 50 mM TTCG in water), or Captan (0.05 mmol/
kg p.o. by gavage using 0.166 M Captan in 1:1 v/v 1,2-
propanediol-PBS) was administered. The rats were returned to
their metabolic cages and the urine collected for 24 h and
processed as described above.
Deter m in a tion of Cr ea tin in e. The determination of crea-
tinine in the urine samples was performed using the Sigma
Diagnostics creatinine kit 555-A (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). This
kit uses a modified J affe reaction and was scaled down for use
as a microplate assay on the SpectraMax 250 Plate Reader
(Molecular Devices). A standard curve for linearity and a known
3 mg/dL creatinine standard were run with each sample plate.
From the nmoles of TTCA or TTCG in 0.5 mL of urine samples
and the creatinine values, TTCA and TTCG were expressed as
nmoles per milligram of creatinine in urine.
The sensitivity and ease of chromatography of the last
two methods in Table 1 are usable but both involve time-
consuming and relatively labor-intensive solvent extrac-
tion. Replacing solvent extraction with solid-phase ex-
traction (SPE) to allow the handling of multiple samples
simultaneously using a manifold would expedite sample
preparation. As noted previously (8), a reversed-phase
C-18 silica cartridge did not adsorb TTCA preferentially
to effect purification. Oasis HLB sorbent (from Waters)
exhibiting both hydrophilic and hydrophobic properties
seemed to be a good candidate for isolating TTCA.
Because TTCA is a polar carboxylic acid with a lipophilic
-S-C(dS)- group, it seemed reasonable that through
changing the pH the ability of TTCA to bind to the Oasis
cartridge could be controlled. Preliminary experiments
indicated that nonionized TTCA was readily adsorbed to
Oasis under acidic conditions and that it could be eluted
using an 80% methanol-water mixture, suitable for
concentration.
To account for small variations during extraction and
concentration, an internal standard was added. In previ-
ous studies tetrahydro-2-thioxo-2H-1,3-thiazine-4-car-
boxylic acid (T3CA), a six membered analogue of TTCA,
was used (3). Also for the present analysis T3CA was
chosen, rather than 2-methylhippuric acid (8) as internal
standard, because of its chemical similarity to TTCA.
Further, under the present chromatographic conditions,
it was well separated from TTCA and the UV maxima of
272 and 282 nm for TTCA and TT3CA, respectively, allow
for single wavelength monitoring at 278 nm. On the basis
of preliminary experiments we arrived at the sample
preparation protocol outlined in Figure 1. The recovery
of TTCA was 79.3 ( 1.0% while that of T3CA was 78.5 (
0.3%.
Resu lts of An a lysis. The urine samples from workers
of a rayon factory were analyzed by the new method and
Figure 2 compares the chromatograms of three samples
of subjects exposed to differing ambient levels of CS2. The
chromatograms contain very few peaks other than those
for TTCA and the internal standard T3CA, and the peak
areas could be measured accurately at quantities less
than 100 pmol/0.5 mL of urine. Since the determination
of TTCA concentration was based on standard curves
using T3CA as internal standard, the values were highly
reproducible. Day to day variation was 2.66% and same
day variation was 0.29%. The sensitivity of determination
was 20 pmol of TTCA in 0.5 mL of urine (or 40 nmol/L)
making it applicable to even low-level exposures (10). A
comparison of the chromatograms points to the estab-
lished relationship between TTCA levels and CS2 expo-
sure levels.
One outcome of the new method that was not antici-
pated during method development was the recognition
of an additional peak (appearing ∼1.6 min after TTCA)
in the samples from workers exposed to CS2 (Figure 2).
This peak was not present in the urine samples obtained
from control subjects. In addition, the area of the peak
appeared to be dependent on the exposure level. To
establish that the new peak originated from CS2, rats
In Vitr o Stu d ies. Cysteine or cys-gly (1 mM) was treated
with either MITC or thiophosgene (2 mM) in phosphate buffer
(pH 8.0) at 37 °C for 18 h and analyzed by HPLC using the
conditions given above.
Resu lts a n d Discu ssion
Assa y Meth od . The first step in most methods of
analysis (Table 1) is extraction of TTCA from urine. When