M. K. Potdar et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 42 (2001) 9285–9287
9287
To study substituent effects on the reactivity of the
phenol, the reactions were performed on a variety of
phenols. The reactions worked well and the results are
illustrated in Table 1. For most of the substrates, the
reaction time is reduced drastically even at ambient
conditions in contrast to reported procedures,7,8 with
an excellent yield of coumarins. Substrates (entries 1–6)
having electron-donating groups in para to the site of
electrophilic substitution gave maximum yields at room
temperature in the minimum time. 3-Methoxyphenol
(entry 2) showed no detectable demethylation under the
given conditions. However, control experiments20 by
conventional method using AlCl3 in nitrobenzene
showed significant demethylation at high temperature
which is necessary to drive the reaction to completion.
1-Naphthol (entry 7) requires a slightly higher tempera-
ture and longer reaction time, due to the presence of
another phenyl ring. Similarly, phenol (entry 8)
required a higher reaction temperature and longer reac-
tion duration, as no electron-donating group is present.
A literature survey revealed that, resacetophenone
(entry 9) failed to react to give a coumarin derivative in
the presence of sulfuric acid as the catalyst. However,
the reaction was observed under aluminium chloride
catalysis,10 but required a temperature of 130°C in
nitrobenzene as the solvent. In contrast, the ionic liquid
furnished comparable yields of the product at 60°C.
Furthermore, the method succeeds in exploiting this
novel system as a Lewis acid catalyst and solvent which
is needed in the reactions in only stoichiometric
amounts.
6. (a) Narasimahan, N. S.; Mali, R. S.; Barve, M. V.
Synthesis 1979, 906; (b) Yavari, I.; Hekmat-Shoar, R.;
Zonouzi, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 2391.
7. Sethna, S.; Phadke, R. Org. React. 1953, 7, 1.
8. Russell, A.; Frye, J. R. Org. Synth. 1941, 21, 22.
9. (a) Simmonis, H.; Remmert, P. Chem. Ber. 1914, 47,
2229; (b) Robertson, A.; Sandrock, W. F.; Henry, C. B.
J. Chem. Soc. 1931, 2426.
10. Sethna, S. M.; Shah, N. M.; Shah, R. C. J. Chem. Soc.
1938, 228.
11. Woods, L. L.; Sapp, J. J. Org. Chem. 1962, 27, 3703.
12. (a) John, E. V. O.; Israelstam, S. S. J. Org. Chem. 1961,
26, 240; (b) Chaudhari, D. A. Chem. Ind. 1983, 568; (c)
Hoefnagel, A. J.; Gunnewegh, E. A.; Downing, R. S.; van
Bekkum, H. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1995, 225.
13. (a) de la Hoz, A.; Moreno, A.; Va´zquez, E. Synlett 1999,
608; (b) Fre´re, S.; Thie´ry, V.; Besson, T. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2001, 42, 2791.
14. (a) Review: Welton, T. Chem. Rev. 1999, 99, 2071; (b)
Review: Wassercheid, P.; Keim, W. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. Engl. 2000, 39, 3772.
15. Freemantle, M. Chem. Eng. News 1998, 76, 32.
16. (a) Fisher, T.; Sethi, A.; Welton, T.; Woolf, J. Tetra-
hedron Lett. 1999, 40, 793; (b) Lee, C. W. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1999, 40, 2461; (c) Boulaire, V. L.; Gre´e, R. Chem.
Commun. 2000, 2195; (d) Davis, Jr., J. H.; Forrester, K.
J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1999, 40, 1628; (e) Dyson, P. J.; Ellis,
D. J.; Parker, D. G.; Welton, T. Chem. Commun. 1999, 1,
25; (f) Erbeldinger, M.; Mesiano, A. J.; Russell, A. J.
Biotechnol. Prog. 2000, 16, 227; (g) Lau, R. M.;
Rantwijk, F.v.; Seddon, K. R.; Sheldon, R. A. Org. Lett.
2000, 2, 4189.
17. (a) Boon, J. A.; Levisky, J. A.; Pflug, J. L.; Wilkes, J. S.
J. Org. Chem. 1986, 51, 480; (b) Adams, C. J.; Earle, M.
J.; Roberts, G.; Seddon, K. R. J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1998, 2097.
18. Harjani, J. R.; Nara, S. J.; Salunkhe, M. M. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2001, 42, 1979.
To conclude, we have successfully achieved the synthe-
ses of coumarins using phenols and ethyl acetoacetate
via Pechmann condensations in acidic chloroaluminate
ionic liquid. Further investigations on the syntheses of
coumarins via Knoevenagel condensations of o-
hydroxy arylaldehydes and the active methylene com-
pounds in these liquids are currently in progress.
19. Typical experimental procedure: To the weighed quantity
of phenol (10 mmol) and ethyl acetoacetate (11 mmol),
the ionic liquid [bmim]Cl·2AlCl3 (11 mmol) was added
and the reaction mixture was stirred at the desired time
and temperature. All additions were carried out in an
inert atmosphere. The reaction was quenched by adding 6
M HCl in cold conditions. The resultant product was
filtered. The products were further purified by column
chromatography and characterised by IR, NMR and
physical constants.
20. The reaction was carried out using 3-methoxyphenol (10
mmol), ethyl acetoacetate (11 mmol) and AlCl3 (20
mmol). A poor yield (15%) of the coumarin derivative
was obtained at room temperature for 20 min along with
2% of the demethylated product. In another experiment,
the reaction was carried out at 125°C for 1 h by using
exactly the same quantities as mentioned above. In this
case, the overall yield of coumarin derivative was 65%, of
which 32% was demethylated product.
References
1. Singer, L. A.; Kong, N. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1966, 88,
5213.
2. O’Kennedy, R.; Thornes, R. D. Coumarins: Biology,
Applications and Mode of Action; Wiley
& Sons:
Chichester, 1997.
3. Zahradnik, M. The Production and Application of Fluo-
rescent Brightening Agents; Wiley & Sons, 1992.
4. Murray, R. D. H.; Mendez, J.; Brown, S. A. The Natural
Coumarins: Occurrence, Chemistry and Biochemistry;
Wiley & Sons: New York, 1982.
5. (a) v. Pechmann, H.; Duisberg, C. Chem. Ber. 1884, 17,
929; (b) Jonson, J. R. Org. React. 1942, 1, 210; (c) Jones,
G. Org. React. 1967, 15, 204; (d) Brufola, G.; Fringuelli,
F.; Piermatti, O.; Pizzo, F. Heterocycles 1996, 43, 1257;
(e) Shriner, R. L. Org. React. 1942, 1, 1.