2028
H. Amada et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 22 (2012) 2024–2029
Table 3
showed a potent enzyme inhibitory activity (18). This result might
be due to its low membrane permeability. The introduction of a
4-fluorophenyl group displayed poor activities in both the enzyme
and the cell-based assay (19). The introduction of a 1,3-ben-
zothiazol-6-yl group resulted in an approximately eightfold
increase in the enzyme inhibition activity and an elevenfold
increase in the cellular activity, compared with the 1,3-ben-
Inhibitory profile of 4-(4-methylthiazol-2-yl)imidazoles 18–20
H3C
CH3
N
HN
N
S
O
R7
N
H
zodioxol-5-yl group (20 vs 9b). Compound 20 (18.1 lg/mL) had a
solubility in water that was about 200 times higher than that of
the initial lead 6b.
Compound
R7
IC50 (nM)
ALK5a
130
Smad2/3a
To examine the binding mode of 20 in the ATP binding site of
ALK5, 20 was docked into the molecular model.13,16 As shown in
Figure 3, the benzothiazole ring binds to the hinge region and
accepts a hydrogen bond from the backbone NH of His-283. The
4-methylthiazol-2-yl nitrogen atom forms water-mediated
networks of hydrogen bonds with the carboxy oxygen of Glu-245,
the hydroxy hydrogen of Tyr-249, and the backbone NH of Asp-
351. The amide moiety at the 2-position of the imidazole ring is
assumed to form a ring through an intramolecular hydrogen bond
in the sugar region. Alternatively, many polar residues exist near
the entrance of the pocket, and the amide moiety is considered to
be committed to an additional hydrogen bond to polar residues or
a water-mediated hydrogen bond to them without ring formation.20
Compound 20, the most potent analogue, was evaluated for
selectivity using a diverse kinase panel.21 Compound 20 was highly
selective against most of the kinases; however, moderate inhibi-
tion was observed for KDR (94%), HGK (75%), CK1d (63%), LYN
18
19
HO
F
1200
1800
6400
N
20
9b
8.2
32
S
O
63
350
O
a
Values are the mean of two or more separate experiments.
increase in potency. The amide group, which was directly linked to
the imidazole ring, displayed a significant loss in enzyme and
cellular potency (12a and 12b). Conversion from the most potent
aliphatic carboxylic acid analogue 11d to pentanamide analogue
12g was tolerable with regard to the enzyme inhibition activity.
The introduction of either a phenyl group or a n-propyl group to
a terminally carbamoyl group in 12g resulted in a slight decrease
in potency (12g vs 12e and 12f). The N-propylamide analogues
12c and 12d showed weak potency compared with the corre-
sponding 12f. We thought that the position of the amide linkage
and an appropriate number of atoms in the linker were very impor-
tant for potency (9b vs 9c, 9d, 12b–d, 12f, 15, and 17b). Compound
(60%), LCK (58%) and p38a (57%) at 10 lM.
In conclusion, we have described that the synthesis, enzyme
inhibitory activity, inhibitory activity against TGF-b-induced
Smad2/3 phosphorylation at the cellular level, SAR, and proposed
ALK5 binding mode of a novel series of 4-thiazolylimidazoles. We
found that the thiazolyl group could be replaced with 2-pyridyl
group. The improvement of the physicochemical properties was
achieved by replacement of the benzamide moiety with an
alkylamide moiety. Compound 20 showed the most ALK5
inhibitory activity and also was highly selective for other kinases.
9b maintained the inhibitory activities; furthermore, 9b (15.7
mL) was about 170 times more soluble in water than 6b
(0.09 g/mL).
lg/
Supplementary data
l
Next, we investigated the effect of the substituent at the 5-posi-
tion of the imidazole ring. The ALK5 inhibitory activities of these
compounds are summarized in Table 3. Replacement of the 1,
3-benzodioxol-5-yl group with a 4-hydroxyphenyl group led to
the loss of inhibition activity in a cell-based assay, even though it
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
References and notes
1. Heldin, C. H.; Miyazono, K.; ten Dijke, P. Nature 1997, 390, 465.
2. Shi, Y.; Massague, J. Cell 2003, 113, 685.
3. Yingling, J. M.; Blanchard, K. L.; Sawyer, J. S. Nat. Rev. Drug Disc. 2004, 3, 1011.
4. Leask, A.; Abraham, D. J. FASEB J. 2004, 18, 816.
5. Agrotis, A.; Kalinina, N.; Bobik, A. Curr. Vasc. Pharmacol. 2005, 3, 55.
6. Bierie, B.; Moses, H. L. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2006, 6, 506.
7. Callahan, J. F.; Burgess, J. L.; Fornwald, J. A.; Gaster, L. M.; Harling, J. D.;
Harrington, F. P.; Heer, J.; Kwon, C.; Lehr, R.; Mathur, A.; Olson, B. A.; Weinstock,
J.; Laping, N. J. J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 999.
8. Inman, G. J.; Nicolas, F. J.; Callahan, J. F.; Harling, J. D.; Gaster, L. M.; Reith, A. D.;
Laping, N. J.; Hill, C. S. Mol. Pharmacol. 2002, 62, 65.
9. Byfield, S. D.; Major, C.; Laping, N. J.; Roberts, A. B. Mol. Pharmacol. 2004, 65, 744.
10. Gellibert, F.; Woolven, J.; Fouchet, M.-H.; Mathews, N.; Goodland, H.;
Lovegrove, V.; Laroze, A.; Nguyen, V.-L.; Sautet, S.; Wang, R.; Janson, C.;
Smith, W.; Krysa, G.; Boullay, V.; de Gouville, A.-C.; Huet, S.; Hartley, D. J. Med.
Chem. 2004, 47, 4494.
11. Gellibert, F.; Fouchet, M.-H.; Nguyen, V.-L.; Wang, R.; Krysa, G.; de Gouville, A.-
C.; Huet, S.; Dodic, N. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2009, 19, 2277.
12. Bonafoux, D.; Claudio Chuaqui, C.;Boriack-Sjodin,P. A.;Fitch,C.; Hankins, G.;Josiah,
S.; Black, C.; Hetu, G.; Ling, L.; Lee, W.-C. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2009, 19, 912.
13. Sawyer, J. S.; Beight, D. W.; Britt, K. S.; Anderson, B. D.; Campbell, R. M.;
Goodson, T.; Herron, D. K.; Li, H. Y.; McMillen, W. T.; Mort, N.; Parsons, S.;
Smith, E. C. R.; Wagner, J. R.; Yan, L.; Zhang, F. M.; Yingling, J. M. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. Lett. 2004, 14, 3581.
14. Kim, D. K.; Jang, Y.; Lee, H. S.; Park, H. J.; Yoo, J. J. Med. Chem. 2007, 50, 3143.
15. Tojo, M.; Hamashima, Y.; Hanyu, A.; Kajimoto, T.; Saitoh, M.; Miyazono, K.;
Node, M.; Imamura, T. Cancer Sci. 2005, 96, 791.
Figure 3. Predicted binding mode of 20 bound to the ATP site of ALK5. Hydrogen
bonds are shown as dotted lines. The protein surface is colored according to the
residue type (magenta, polar; green, hydrophobic; red, exposed).