hexafluorophosphate ([bmim]PF6) ionic liquid. In the absence
of catalyst, low conversions (25–55%) were obtained in
[bmim]PF6 ionic liquid. No significant differences in reaction
rates and yields were observed with either the [bmim]BF4–
InCl3 or [bmim]PF6–InCl3 catalytic systems.
3.78–3.90 (m, 1H), 4.05 (dd, 1H, J ¼ 6.0, 11.7 Hz), 4.18–4.28
(m, 3H), 4.60 (br s, 1H), 5.55–5.70 (m, 2H). 3j: 1H NMR
(CDCl3) d: 1.45–1.80 (m, 12H), 3.40–3.57 (m, 2H), 3.75–3.85
(m, 2H), 4.0–4.15 (m, 2H), 4.18–4.28 (m, 1H), 4.60 (br s,
2H), 5.63–5.70 (m, 2H).
Finally, the catalytic performance of various quaternary
ammonium salts was studied for this conversion. The tetra-
hydropyranylation was not successful when n-tetrabutyl ammo-
nium chloride (n-Bu4NCl) or 1-n-butyl-3-methylimidazolium
chloride ([bmim]Cl) was used as the reaction media. Similar
results were obtained even in the n-Bu4NCl–InCl3 or
[bmim]Cl–InCl3catalytic systems. This indicates that both
cation and anion play an important role as the solvent in this
transformation. Furthermore, the recovery and reuse of
indium trichloride is especially simple in ionic liquids
compared to organic solvents.
In summary, this paper describes a method for the chemo-
selective conversion of alcohols to tetrahydropyranyl and
furanyl ethers using a catalytic amount of indium trichloride
in ionic liquids that operates under mild conditions, thereby
leaving acid- and base-labile protecting groups intact. The sim-
ple experimental and product isolation procedures combined
with ease of recovery and reuse of this novel reaction media
is expected to contribute to the development of a green strat-
egy for the tetrahydropyranylation and furanylation of alco-
hols in protective group chemistry. Furthermore, the use of
1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate ([bmim]BF4)
ionic liquid as promoter for this transformation avoids the
use of toxic or corrosive and moisture-sensitive reagents.
Acknowledgements
BVS thanks CSIR, New Delhi, for the award of a fellowship.
References
1
2
(a) T. Welton, Chem. Rev., 1999, 99, 2071; (b) P. Wasserscheid
and W. Keim, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2000, 39, 3772.
(a) R. Sheldon, Chem. Commun., 2001, 2399; (b) P. Bonhote, A. P.
ˆ
Dias, N. Papageorgiou, K. Kalyanasundaram and M. Gra¨tzel,
Inorg. Chem., 1996, 35, 1168; (c) C. M. Gordon, Appl. Catal. A:
Gen., 2001, 222, 101.
3
(a) T. W. Greene and P. G. M. Wuts, Protective Groups in Organic
Synthesis, Willey, New York, 1999, pp. 49–54; (b) P. J. Kocienski,
Protecting Groups, Thieme, Stuttgart, 1994, pp. 156–170.
S. Hoyer and P. Laszlo, Synthesis, 1986, 655 and references cited
therein.
(a) K. F. Bernady and M. J. Wiess, J. Org. Chem., 1979, 44, 1438;
(b) M. Miyashita, A. Yoshikoshi and P. A. Grieco, J. Org. Chem.,
1977, 42, 3772; (c) V. Bolitt and C. Mioskowski, Tetrahedron
Lett., 1988, 29, 4583.
4
5
6
7
(a) G. A. Olah, A. Hussain and B. P. Singh, Synthesis, 1985, 703;
(b) T. Nishiguchi, S. Fujisaki, M. Kuroda, K. Kajisaki and
M. Saitoh, J. Org. Chem., 1998, 63, 8183; (c) V. V. Namboodiri
and R. S. Varma, Tetrahedron Lett., 2002, 43, 1143.
(a) A. Bongini, G. Cardillo, M. Orena and S. Sandri, Synthesis,
1979, 618; (b) G. A. Olah, A. Hussain and B. P. Singh, Synthesis,
1983, 892; (c) R. Ballini, F. Bigi, S. Carloni, R. Maggi and G.
Sartori, Tetrahedron Lett., 1997, 38, 4169; (d ) A. Molnar and
T. Beregszaszi, Tetrahedron Lett., 1996, 37, 8597.
Experimental
1-Butyl-3-methylimidazolium tetrafluoroborate ([bmim]BF4)
and
1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium
hexafluorophosphate
([bmim]PF6) ionic liquids were prepared according to the
procedures reported in the literature.13
8
9
(a) T. Meshiguchi and K. Kawamine, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Com-
mun., 1990, 1766; (b) B. C. Ranu and M. Saha, J. Org. Chem.,
1994, 59, 8269.
(a) L. C. Branco and C. A. M. Afonso, Tetrahedron, 2001, 57,
4405; (b) V. V. Namboodiri and R. S. Varma, Chem. Commun.,
2002, 342.
Experimental procedure. A mixture of alcohol (1 mmol),
DHP or DHF (1.5 mmol), in 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium
tetrafluoroborate (1 mL) or 5 mol % InCl3 in 1-butyl-3-methyl-
imidazolium hexafluorophosphate (1 mL) was stirred at ambi-
ent temperature for an appropriate time (see Table 1). After
completion of the reaction, as indicated by TLC, the reaction
mixture was washed with diethyl ether (3 ꢁ 10 mL). The com-
bined ether extracts were concentrated in vacuo and the result-
ing product was directly charged on a small silica gel column
and eluted with a mixture of ethyl acetate–n-hexane (1:9) to
afford pure ether. The rest of the viscous ionic liquid was
further washed with ether and recycled in subsequent reac-
tions. Spectral data for selected products: 3d: 1H NMR
(CDCl3) d: 1.45–1.80 (m, 6H), 1.85–1.95 (m, 2H), 2.05 (s,
3H), 3.35–3.50 (m, 2H), 3.75–3.85 (m, 2H), 4.15 (t, 2H,
J ¼ 6.0 Hz), 4.55 (br s, 1H). 3k: 1H NMR (CDCl3) d: 0.08
(s, 6H), 0.85 (s, 9H), 1.45–1.90 (m, 6H), 3.40–3.48 (m, 1H),
10 (a) K. Tanemura, T. Horaguchi and T. Suzuki, Bull. Chem. Soc.
Jpn., 1992, 65, 304; (b) H. M. S. Kumar, B. V. S. Reddy,
E. J. Reddy and J. S. Yadav, Chem. Lett., 1999, 857; (c) K.
Pachamuthu and Y. D. Vankar, J. Org. Chem., 2001, 66, 7511;
(d ) B. S. Babu and K. K. Balasubramanian, Synlett, 1999, 1261.
11 (a) C. J. Li and T. H. Chan, Tetrahedron, 1999, 55, 11 149; (b) G.
Babu and P. T. Perumal, Aldrichima Acta, 2000, 33, 16; (c) R.
Ghosh, Indian J. Chem., Sect. B: Org. Chem. Incl. Med. Chem.,
2001, 40, 550.
12 (a) J. S. Yadav, B. V. S. Reddy, J. V. Raman, N. Niranjan, S. K.
Kumar and A. C. Kunwar, Tetrahedron Lett., 2002, 43, 2095; (b)
J. S. Yadav, B. V. S. Reddy and G. M. Kumar, Synlett, 2001,
1417; (c) J. S. Yadav, A. Sunny, B. V. S. Reddy and G. Sabitha,
Tetrahedron Lett., 2001, 42, 8063.
13 Preparation of ionic liquids: (a) S. Park and R. J. Kazlauskas,
ˆ
J. Org. Chem., 2001, 66, 8395; (b) P. Bonhote, A. P. Dias, N.
Papageorgiou, K. Kalyanasundaram and M. Gra¨tzel, Inorg.
Chem., 1996, 35, 1168.
204
New J. Chem., 2003, 27, 202–204