Full Paper
(
cyclam)](ClO4)2 (46.3 mg, 0.1 mmol) in 0.5 mL of H O. The
with liquid nitrogen (T = 77 K) and equipped with a PremiumX
2
Na SnS ·14H O solution was added to the [Cu(cyclam)](ClO ) solu-
microwave bridge and a Bruker dual mode X-band cavity. The sam-
4
4
2
4 2
tion, stirred for 20 min. and was kept at room temperature. A violet
crystalline precipitate was formed after 2 h (≈ 29 % yield based on
Sn). Elemental analysis: found C: 23.90 %, H: 5.23 %, N: 11.11 %,
calculated: C: 24.18 %, H: 5.28 %, N: 11.28 %.
ples were dissolved in a mixture of H O/Glycerine (4:6) transferred
into a 1 mm quartz tube and measured at 77 K.
2
Thermogravimetric Analysis: Thermogravimetric investigations
were carried out using a Linseis STA PT1600 instrument, in which
the sample was heated in a nitrogen atmosphere with a heating
Structure Determination: The X-ray powder pattern (PXRD) of
compound I could be successfully indexed in a triclinic unit cell with
a Goodness of Fit of 50.6 using TOPAS Academics.[44] The position
of most atoms except for some carbon atoms of the cyclam ligand
–
1
rate of 4 K ∙min .
Acknowledgments
Financial support by the State of Schleswig-Holstein is grate-
fully acknowledged. We thank Inke Jess for the TG measure-
ments. We also thank Dr. Jan Krahmer for the EPR measurement.
could be determined using direct methods as implemented in Expo
45]
2
009.[ The missing carbon atoms of the ligand were subsequently
inserted using the molecular modelling software Materials Stu-
dio.[ The thus obtained model was further optimized by force-
field calculations using the universal force-field[ as implemented
in the forcite routine in Materials Studio. This structurally optimized
46]
47]
Keywords: Copper(II) thiostannate · Room temperature
starting model was afterwards converted into the conventional
crystallographic setting using Platon[ and the structure could be synthesis · Rietveld refinement · Electronic properties ·
successfully refined with the Rietveld method. The positions of all Thermal properties
atoms were freely refined using only bond restrains. The residual
48]
electron density in the Fourier map was attributed to crystal water
[
1] a) C. L. Teske, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 1985, 522, 122–130; b) C. L. Teske, Z.
Anorg. Allg. Chem. 1976, 419, 67–76; c) C. L. Teske, O. Vetter, Z. Anorg.
Allg. Chem. 1976, 426, 281–287; d) T. Bernert, A. Pfitzner, Z. Kristallogr.
molecules. A preferred orientation along [1–10] was taken into ac-
count using the method of March.[
49]
The isotropic displacement
factors were refined element specific or as a group for C and N
atoms. The final Rietveld refinement plot is shown Figure S8 and
some reliability factors are summarized in Table S3.
2005, 220, 3519; e) J. A. Aitken, J. W. Lekse, J.-L. Yao, R. Quinones, J. Solid
State Chem. 2009, 182, 141–146.
[
[
[
2] X.-a. Chen, H. Wada, A. Sato, Mater. Res. Bull. 1999, 34, 239–247.
3] J. H. Liao, M. G. Kanatzidis, Chem. Mater. 1993, 5, 1561–1569.
4] C. Bourgès, P. Lemoine, O. I. Lebedev, R. Daou, V. Hardy, B. Malaman, E.
Guilmeau, Acta Mater. 2015, 97, 180–190.
CCDC 1947342 (for compound I) contains the supplementary crys-
[
[
5] D.-X. Jia, Y. Zhang, J. Dai, Q.-Y. Zhu, X.-M. Gu, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2004,
6
30, 313–318.
6] M. Behrens, S. Scherb, C. Näther, W. Bensch, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2003,
29, 1367–1373.
Characterization Methods
X-ray Powder Diffraction (PXRD): The powder diffraction patterns
were measured with a STOE Stadi-P diffractometer equipped with
a MYTHEN 1K detector (DECTRIS) using monochromatized Cu-Kα1
radiation (λ = 1.540598 Å). The experimental and the calculated
patterns using the results of the Rietveld refinement match per-
fectly indicating phase purity of the sample (Figures S9).
6
[7] N. Pienack, H. Lühmann, B. Seidlhofer, J. Ammermann, C. Zeisler, F.
Danker, C. Näther, W. Bensch, Solid State Sci. 2014, 33, 67–72.
[8] D.-X. Jia, J. Dai, Q.-Y. Zhu, Y. Zhang, X.-M. Gu, Polyhedron 2004, 23, 937–
9
42.
9] J. Hilbert, C. Näther, W. Bensch, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2017, 643, 1861–
866.
[
1
Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDX): EDX analysis (Table
S4) was carried out on a Philips Environmental Scanning Electron
Microscope ESEM XL30 equipped with an EDX detector.
[10] N. Pienack, D. Schinkel, A. Puls, M.-E. Ordolff, H. Lühmann, C. Näther, W.
Bensch, Z. Naturforsch. B 2012, 67, 1098–1106.
[
[
11] C. Zeisler, C. Näther, W. Bensch, CrystEngComm 2013, 15, 8874.
12] J. Hilbert, N. Pienack, H. Lühmann, C. Näther, W. Bensch, Z. Anorg. Allg.
Chem. 2016, 642, 1427–1434.
Elemental Analysis: CHNS elemental analysis was performed with
an EURO EA Elemental Analyzer (EURO VECTOR Instruments and
Software).
[13] N. Pienack, S. Lehmann, H. Lühmann, M. El-Madani, C. Näther, W. Bensch,
Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2008, 634, 2323–2329.
[
[
14] J. Hilbert, C. Näther, W. Bensch, Inorg. Chim. Acta 2017, 459, 29–35.
15] a) J. Hilbert, C. Näther, W. Bensch, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2014, 640, 2858–
Infrared Spectroscopy: The IR spectrum was measured at room
–
1
temperature from 80 to 6000 cm with a Bruker Vertex70 FT-IR
2
863; b) J. Hilbert, C. Näther, W. Bensch, Inorg. Chem. 2014, 53, 5619–
spectrometer.
5630.
[
[
[
16] J. Hilbert, C. Näther, W. Bensch, Dalton Trans. 2015, 44, 11542–11550.
17] N. Pienack, W. Bensch, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2006, 632, 1733–1736.
18] Y. An, B. Menghe, L. Ye, M. Ji, X. Liu, G. Ning, Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2005,
Raman Spectroscopy: The Raman spectrum was collected at room
temperature on a Bruker RAM II FT-Raman spectrometer equipped
with a liquid nitrogen cooled, highly sensitive Ge detector. The radi-
8
, 301–303.
[19] W.-W. Xiong, J. Miao, P.-Z. Li, Y. Zhao, B. Liu, Q. Zhang, CrystEngComm
014, 16, 5989–5992.
20] N. Pienack, A. Puls, C. Näther, W. Bensch, Inorg. Chem. 2008, 47, 9606–
611.
–
1
ation and the resolution are 1064 nm and 3 cm , respectively.
2
UV/Visible Spectroscopy: UV/Vis measurement was done at room
[
temperature with an UV/Vis/NIR two channel spectrometer Cary 5
9
–
1
(
Varian Techtron Pty., Darmstadt, 200–3000 cm ) using BaSO as
4
[21] M. Behrens, M.-E. Ordolff, C. Näther, W. Bensch, K.-D. Becker, C. Guillot-
Deudon, A. Lafond, J. A. Cody, Inorg. Chem. 2010, 49, 8305–8309.
[22] N. Pienack, C. Näther, W. Bensch, Solid State Sci. 2007, 9, 100–107.
[23] R.-C. Zhang, H.-G. Yao, S.-H. Ji, M.-C. Liu, M. Ji, Y.-L. An, Chem. Commun.
2010, 46, 4550–4552.
reference. The UV/Vis data were converted applying the Kubelka–
Munk function. For determination of the solubility of the complex,
UV/Vis spectra were measured on an Agilent 8453 spectrometer in
a range of 190 nm to 1100 nm with deviation of ±0.5 nm and
wavelength reproducibility of ±0.02 nm.
[
24] A. Lafond, J. A. Cody, M. Souilah, C. Guillot-Deudon, R. Kiebach,
W. Bensch, Inorg. Chem. 2007, 46, 1502–1506.
Electron Paramagnetic Resonance (EPR) Spectroscopy: The EPR
[25] X. Liang, P. J. Sadler, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2004, 33, 246–266.
spectrum was collected on a Bruker EMXplus spectrometer cooled
[26] B. Seidlhofer, N. Pienack, W. Bensch, Z. Naturforsch. B 2010, 65, 937–975.
Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2019, 1–7
www.eurjic.org
5
© 2019 The Authors. Published by Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim