Full Paper
2
-[10-(9,9-Dihexyl-9H-fluoren-2-yl)-4,7,13,16-tetraphenylcyclo-
octadeca-1,2,3,7,8,14,15-nonaen-5,11,17-triyn-1-yl]-9,9-dihexyl-
H-fluorene (3a): SnCl2 (85 mg, 0.4 mmol) and HCl/Et O (0.4 mL,
cooled microfocus source, by using MoKa radiation (l=0.71073 ).
Phi and omega scans were used. The data were integrated with
[31]
9
SAINT, and an empirical absorption correction with SADABS was
2
[32]
0
0
.8 mmol) were successively added to a solution of diol 6a (53 mg,
.04 mmol) in dry dichloromethane (12 mL) at À788C. The temper-
applied. The structures were solved by direct methods (SHELXS-
[
33]
2
97)
and refined by the least-squares method on F (SHELXL-
[33]
ature of the mixture was allowed to slowly increase to À208C over
97). All non-H atoms were refined with anisotropic displacement
parameters. The H atoms were refined isotropically at calculated
positions using a riding model.
3
h. Then 1m aqueous NaOH (0.9 mL, 0.9 mmol) was added. The
aqueous layer was extracted with dichloromethane and the com-
bined organic layers were washed with brine, dried over MgSO4
CCDC 1047701 (3a) and 1047702 (3b) contain the supplementary
crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained
and concentrated to dryness under reduced pressure. The residue
was purified by silica-gel chromatography (EtOAc:pentane 5:95) to
give 3a as a dark solid (28 mg, 59% yield). M.p. >3008C; R (EtOA-
f
1
c:heptane 5:96)=0.26; H NMR (CDCl ): d=0.71 (brs, 12H, CH ),
3
3
0
2
.91–1.28 (m, 32H, ((CH ) CH ) 2.34–2.47 (m, 4H, (CH -C1-Fluo)
2 4 3 2
Computational details
.47–2.60 (m, 4H, CH -C1-Fluo), 7.45–7.62 (m, 6H, H6-, H7-, H8-
2
Fluo), 7.79 (t, J=6.75 Hz, 4H, p-Ph), 7.96–8.12 (m, 10H, m-Ph, H9-
Fluo), 8.33 (d, J=8.20 Hz, 2H, H13-Fluo), 9.47–9.63 (m, 12H, o-Ph,
Geometries of the ground states were fully optimized at the
B3PW91/6-31G** level of theory by using Gaussian 09. Vibration-
[34]
1
3
1
H10-, H12-Fluo). C{ H} NMR (CDCl ): d=13.95 (CH ), 22.58, 24.07,
3
3
al analysis was performed at the same level of theory as the geom-
etry optimization. Vertical excitation energies were subsequently
calculated at the TD-CAM-B3LYP/6-31G** level of theory by using
2
9.94, 31.58 ((CH ) ), 40.97 ((CH )-C1-Fluo), 55.72 (C1-Fluo), 104.03
2 4 2
(
C-Ph), 105.89 (C-Fluo) 117.88, 117.92, 118.87 (C=C=C=C, CÀCꢀCÀ
C), 120.56, 121.11, 123.25, 124.54, 125.93, 127.23, 127.99 (C6-, C7-,
[34]
Gaussian 09. Solvent effects were included by using the polariza-
C8-, C9-, C10-, C12-, C13-Fluo), 129.40 (p-Ph), 129.92 (o-Ph), 130.53
ble continuum model (PCM) implemented in Gaussian 09 for
(m-Ph), 139.34, 140.49, 140.61, 142.98 (i-Ph, C3-, C4-, C11-Fluo),
[34]
chloroform (e=4.7113). Molecular orbitals were plotted with GA-
1
51.66, 152.58 (C2-, C5-Fluo); MS (MALDI-TOF/DCTB): m/z 1191.8
[35]
BEDIT.
+
+
[M+H] ; HRMS (MALDI-TOF/DCTB): m/z calcd for C H [M] :
SOS
9
2
86
Two-photon absorption cross-sections s2PA were calculated using
1
190.6730; found: 1190.6730; UV/Vis (CHCl3): lmax =494 nm
DALTON2011 (“.TWO-PHOTON” keyword within quadratic re-
À1
À1
(
eꢁ332000 Lmol cm ); voltammetry: reduction: À0.75 (rev.),
À1.14 (rev.), À1.62 (irrev.); oxidation: 1.08 (rev), 1.39 (irrev.), 1.84
irrev.), 1.98 (irrev.).
-[10-(9,9-Dihexyl-9H-fluoren-2-yl)ethynyl-4,7,13,16-tetraphenyl-
[36]
sponse), from the SOS scheme by computing the 2PA transition
matrix elements Smn between the ground state j0i and the final
(
[24]
state jfi according to Equation (1):
2
cyclooctadeca-1,2,3,7,8,14,15-nonaen-5,11,17-triyn-1-yl]-9,9-di-
hexyl-9H-fluorene (3b): SnCl2 (70 mg, 0.36 mmol) and HCl/Et O
ꢀ
ꢁ
2
X
h0jm jiihijm jfi h0jm jiihijm jfi
m
n
n
m
Smn
¼
þ
ð1Þ
(
(
0.36 mL, 0.72 mmol) were successively added to a solution of 6b
50 mg, 0.036 mmol) in dry dichloromethane (12 mL) with stirring
ðw À wÞ
ðw À wÞ
i
i
i
at À788C. The temperature was slowly increased up to 08C over
in which w is the fundamental frequency of the laser beam which
3
h. Then 1m aqueous NaOH (0.8 mL, 0.8 mmol) was added. The
is equal to the half of the excitation energy to the final state w /2.
f
aqueous layer was extracted with dichloromethane and the com-
bined organic layers were washed with brine, dried over MgSO4,
and concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was puri-
fied by silica-gel chromatography (dichloromethane:pentane 1:9)
For a given final excited state jfi, the summation runs over all in-
termediate states jii of energy w. The 2PA probability d
for
2PA
i
a given molecular structure in the gas or liquid phase can be ob-
tained by orientational averaging [Eq. (2)]:
to give 3b as a dark solid (23 mg, 51% yield). Mp >3008C; R (di-
f
1
chloromethane:pentane 2:8)=0.24; H NMR (400 MHz, CD Cl ): d=
X
X
2
2
SOS
2PA
d
¼ A
SmmSnn þ B
SmnSmn
0
7
.75–1.28 (m, 44H, (CH ) CH ), 2.15–2.38 (m, 8H, CH -Fluo), 7.44–
.58 (m, 6H, Fluo), 7.80 (t, J=7.3 Hz, 4H, p-Ph), 7.91–7.95 (m, 2H,
ð2Þ
2
4
3
2
mn
mn
Fluo), 8.04 (m, 10H, m-Ph, Fluo), 8.17 (m, 4H, H9, H13-Fluo), 9.53
1
3
1
The coefficients A and B depend on the polarization of the light:
A=2, B=4 for linearly polarized light and A=À2, B=6 for circu-
larly polarized light. For direct comparison with experimental
values, the 2PA probability can then be converted into a cross-sec-
(
(
(
1
1
d, J=7.3 Hz, 8H, o-Ph). C{ H} NMR (101 MHz, CD Cl ): d=13.8
2 2
CH ), 40.5, 31.6, 29.7, 24.0, 22.6 ((CH ) ), 55.5 (>C-Hex ), 91.1, 84.7
3
2 5
2
Fluo-CꢀC-), 100.5 (CÀCꢀC-Fluo), 104.9 (C-Ph), 123.1, 121.0, 120.4,
20.1, 118.7, 113.8 (C6-, C9-, C13-, C11-Fluo, C=C=C=C, CÀCꢀCÀC),
4
À2
tion in GM (cm sphoton ) by using Equation (3):
31.4, 130.1, 130.0, 129.9, 128.1, 127.1, 126.7 (C7-, C8-, C10-, C12-
Fluo, o-, m-, p-Ph), 143.0, 140.3, 139.0 (C3-, C4-Fluo, i-Ph), 151.4,
+
1
51.3 (C2-, C5-Fluo); MS (MALDI-TOF/DCTB): m/z 1238.7 [M] ;
SOS
PA
3
4
0
2
2
SOS
2PA
+
s2 ¼ 8p a t
0
a w d
ð3Þ
HRMS (MALDI-TOF/DCTB): m/z calcd for C H [M] : 1238.6730;
9
6
86
found:
eꢁ381900 Lmol cm ); voltammetry: reduction: À0.61 (rev.),
À0.99 (rev), À1.57 (irrev.), À1.94 (irrev.); oxidation: 1.17 (irrev.), 1.46
irrev.), 1.75 (irrev.), 1.89 (irrev.).
1238.6772;
UV/Vis
(CHCl3):
lmax =492 nm
À1
À1
in which a is the fine-structure constant, a
0
the Bohr radius (in cm/
(
a.u.), t the atomic unit of time (in s/a.u.), and w the photon energy
0
(
in a.u.), that is, w=w /2.
f
(
In many cases, centrosymmetric organic molecules fit into the
[1c,10,25]
three-level model.
The 2PA probability can therefore be ap-
proximated to the truncation of the summation of Equation (1) to
a single intermediate excited state, and involving the transition
dipole moments of the two related successive 1PA processes and
the energy difference between the intermediate state and a virtual
state lying halfway to the 2PA state, referred to as DE [Eq. (4)]:
Crystallographic data collection and structure determination
for 3a and 3b
The data were collected at low temperature (193 K) on a Bruker-
AXS APEX II QUAZAR diffractometer equipped with a 30W air-
Chem. Eur. J. 2015, 21, 14186 – 14195
14193
ꢀ 2015 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim