Journal of Natural Medicines
NMR (125 MHz, C5D5N) (see Tables 2, 3).
(99:1:0.1) and CHCl3–MeOH–H2O (19:1:0.1) to yield
d-cymarose (0.4 mg from 1; 0.7 mg from 6; 0.5 mg from
7), d-digitoxose (0.9 mg from 3; 0.5 mg from 7), and O-(6-
deoxy-3-O-methyl-β-d-allopyranosyl)-(1 → 4)-d-olean-
dropyranose (1.4 mg from 1; 0.7 mg from 3; 0.7 mg from
7). The sugars were analyzed by HPLC under the follow-
ing conditions: column, Shodex sugar SC1011 (8.0 mm
i.d.×300 mm, 5 µm; Showa-denko, Tokyo, Japan); solvent,
H2O; fow rate, 1.0 mL/min; temperature, 80 °C; detection,
optical rotation (OR). The identifcation of d-cymarose and
d-digitoxose was achieved through a comparison of their
retention times (tR) and ORs with those of authenticated
standard samples; tR (min): d-cymarose (8.04, positive OR)
and d-digitoxose (9.32, positive OR). Identifcation of O-(6-
deoxy-3-O-methyl-β-d-allopyranosyl)-(1→4)-d-oleandro-
pyranose was achieved through a comparison of the specifc
rotation and the 1H and 13C NMR spectra with those of lit-
erature data.
11α‑Acetoxy‑12β‑[((E)‑cinnamoyl)oxy]‑8β,
14β‑dihydroxy‑20‑oxo‑pregn‑5‑en‑3β‑yl
O‑β‑d‑cymaropyranosyl‑(1 →4)‑β‑d‑cymaropyranoside (6)
An amorphous solid; [α]2D5 112.2 (c 0.10, MeOH); UV
(MeOH) λmax (log ε) 280.5 (4.31) nm; IR (flm) νmax 3429
(OH), 2932 (CH), 1744 and 1713 (C=O) cm−1; HRESI-
TOF-MS m/z 863.4201 [M+Na]+ (calcd for C46H64O14Na,
1
863.4194); H-NMR (500 MHz, C5D5N) δ 8.12 (1H, d,
J = 16.0 Hz, Cin), 7.62 (2H, m, Cin), 7.36 (1H, m, Cin),
7.35 (2H, m, Cin), 6.92 (1H, d, J=16.0 Hz, Cin), 6.34 (1H,
t-like, J=10.0 Hz, H-11), 5.50 (1H, d, J=10.0 Hz, H-12),
5.36 (1H, d, J = 5.0 Hz, H-6), 2.20 (3H, s, CH3-21), 1.96
(3H, s, OAc-11), 1.70 (3H, s, CH3-18), 1.61 (3H, s, CH3-19),
C5D5N) (see Tables 2, 3).
O-(6-Deoxy-3-O-methyl-β-d-allopyranosyl)-(1→4)-β-d-
oleandropyranose: an amorphous solid; [α]2D5 7.4 (c 0.10,
1
11α‑Acetoxy‑12β‑[((E)‑cinnamoyl)oxy]‑8β,14β‑dihydroxy‑2
0‑oxo‑pregn‑5‑en‑3β‑yl O‑(6‑deoxy‑3‑O‑methyl‑β‑d‑
allopyranosyl)‑(1 →4)‑O‑β‑d‑oleandropyranosyl‑(1 →4)‑
O‑β‑d‑digitoxopyranosyl‑β‑d‑cymaropyranoside (7)
MeOH); H-NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 5.34 (1H, br s,
α-Ole-1), 4.82 (1H, d, J = 8.3 Hz, All-1), 4.81 (1H, dd,
J = 8.3, 1.7 Hz, β-Ole-1), 4.00 (1H, dq, J = 9.3, 6.3 Hz,
α-Ole-5), 3.80 (1H, dd, J=6.0, 2.8 Hz, All-3), 3.77 (1H, dd,
J=6.4, 4.6 Hz, α-Ole-3), 3.67 (3H, s, All-3-OMe), 3.56 (1H,
dq, J=9.7, 6.1 Hz, All-5), 3.49 (1H, m, All-2), 3.43 (1H, dd,
J=4.6, 2.8 Hz, β-Ole-3), 3.41 (1H, m, β-Ole-5), 3.40 (3H,
s, α-Ole-3-OMe), 3.40 (3H, s, β-Ole-3-OMe), 3.37 (1H, m,
α-Ole-4), 3.37 (1H, m, β-Ole-4), 3.20 (1H, m, All-4), 2.45
(1H, ddd, J=13.3, 4.6, 1.8 Hz, β-Ole-2eq), 2.31 (1H, ddd,
J=12.8, 4.6, 1.8 Hz, α-Ole-2eq), 1.55 (1H, m, α-Ole-2ax),
1.43 (1H, m, β-Ole-2ax), 1.38 (3H, d, J=6.0 Hz, β-Ole-6),
1.32 (3H, d, J=6.3 Hz, α-Ole-6), 1.27 (3H, d, J=6.1 Hz,
All-6); 13C-NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 91.9, 34.6, 76.1,
80.1, 67.6, 18.7 (α-Ole-1–C-6), 56.3 (α-Ole-3-OMe), 94.0,
37.1, 78.9, 80.1, 79.4, 18.9 (β-Ole-1–6), 56.3 (β-Ole-3-
OMe), 99.1 72.3, 81.2, 73.0, 71.6, 18.1 (All-1–C-6), 62.2
(All-3-OMe).
An amorphous solid; [α]2D5 64.4 (c 0.10, MeOH); UV
(MeOH) λmax (log ε) 280.0 (4.19) nm; IR (flm) νmax 3446
(OH), 2931 (CH), 1746, 1713 and 1698 (C=O) cm−1
;
HRESI-TOF-MS m/z 1153.5536 [M+Na]+ (calcd for
1
C59H86O21Na, 1153.5559); H-NMR (500 MHz, C5D5N)
δ 8.12 (1H, d, J = 16.0 Hz, Cin), 7.63 (2H, m, Cin), 7.36
(1H, m, Cin), 7.35 (2H, m, Cin), 6.92 (1H, d, J=16.0 Hz,
Cin), 6.35 (1H, t-like, J = 10.1 Hz, H-11), 5.51 (1H, d,
J = 10.1 Hz, H-12), 5.36 (1H, br d, J = 5.4 Hz, H-6), 2.20
(3H, s, CH3-21), 1.98 (3H, s, OAc-11), 1.70 (3H, s, CH3-18),
13C-NMR (125 MHz, C5D5N) (see Tables 2, 3).
Acid hydrolysis of 1, 3, 6, and 7
Enzymatic hydrolysis of 2
Compounds 1 (5.7 mg), 3 (5.1 mg), 6 (3.2 mg), and 7
(4.1 mg) were dissolved separately in 0.025 M HCl (diox-
ane–H2O, 1:1, 2 mL). Each solution was heated at 95 °C for
1.5 h under an argon atmosphere. After cooling, the reaction
mixture was neutralized by passing through an Amberlite
IRA-96SB column and chromatographed on silica gel eluted
with CHCl3–MeOH (19:1) to yield the aglycone and sugar
fractions. The aglycone fraction was subjected to a silica gel
column chromatography eluted with CHCl3–MeOH–H2O
(19:1:0.1) to yield 1a (1.6 mg from 1; 2.4 mg from 3). The
aglycones of 6 and 7 were decomposed under acidic con-
ditions and could not be obtained. The sugar fraction was
subjected to silica gel CC eluted with EtOAc–MeOH–H2O
Compound 2 (6.0 mg) was treated with β-d-glucosidase
(EC 232-589-7; Sigma-Aldrich; 62.0 mg) in NaOAc/KOAc
bufer (pH 5.0, 5 mL) at room temperature for 168 h. The
reaction mixture was chromatographed on silica gel eluted
with CHCl3–MeOH–H2O (7:4:1) to yield 1 (0.3 mg) and a
sugar fraction (0.3 mg). The sugar fraction was analyzed
by HPLC under the following conditions: column, Capcell
Pak NH2 UG80 (4.6 mm i.d. × 250 mm, 5 µm, Shiseido
Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan); solvent, MeCN-H2O (17:3); fow
rate, 1.0 mL/min; detector, OR. The identifcation of d-glu-
cose present in the sugar fraction was achieved through a
1 3