Angewandte
Communications
Chemie
substrates, induction of stereoselectivity, and promotion of
results in various solvents and with various bases (entries 6–
the elimination of the nitro group.
13). The best results were obtained in CH2Cl2 with DABCO
as the base, with 4a in 81% ee (entry 6). It was notable that
the elimination of HNO2 was normally slow at 08C. However,
by increasing the temperature to 408C, after completion of
the cycloaddition step, the elimination was accelerated with-
out observing any deleterious effect on the enantioselectivity
of 4a. Moreover, the multiple roles of the additive DABCO
were found to be essential in the reaction, thus preventing
potential self-aggregation of 3c, and increasing conversion
and enantioselectivity (entries 6 and 12). We also tested other
aminocatalysts for the model reaction and used, for example,
the TMS-protected diarylprolinol catalysts, which gave lower
conversions and enantioselectivities, required longer reaction
times, and higher reaction temperatures, thus verifying the
threefold role of 3 (see the Supporting Information).
To study the steric and electronic effects, the reaction of
the 3-nitroindoles 1 with 2a was investigated with various N-
protecting groups in 1 (Scheme 2). From the results, it appears
that the reaction is not dependent on the N-protecting group
in 1, as greater than 95% conversion was observed and the
enantioselectivity was rather consistent (76–81% ee) for all
four N-protecting groups studied.
Towards our aim, the model reaction was envisioned to
proceed by reaction of the 3-nitroindole 1a with (E)-5-
methylhexa-2,4-dienal (2a) in the presence of a hydrogen-
bond directing organocatalyst (3), which should have the
properties mentioned above (Table 1). Furthermore, a base
additive would also be needed as the strategy is based on the
elimination of HNO2 from 1a.[15] Table 1 presents some
representative screening results. The reaction was dependent
on the additive as greater than 95% conversion was obtained
when a base was used, and no reaction took place when, for
example, N,N-diethylacetamide (DEA) was present (entries 1
and 2). A basic additive such as DABCO was required for the
reaction to take place, and in the presence of the squaramide-
based catalyst 3a high conversions were found in both toluene
and CH2Cl2 (entries 2–4). The catalyst 3a gave up to 79% ee
of the cycloaddition product 4a (entry 4), while the thiourea-
based catalyst 3b gave the same enantioselectivity and
increased conversion to greater than 95% (entry 5). The
corresponding urea-based catalyst 3c showed promising
Table 1: Screening and optimization of reaction conditions for the formal
[4+2] cycloaddition to 3-nitroindole 1a.[a]
Scheme 2. Variation of the N-protecting group in the 3-nitroindoles 1.
Conversion of the limiting reagent was measured by 1H NMR analysis
of the crude reaction mixture. The ee values were determined by chiral-
phase UPC2 after reduction of 4 into the alcohol. Boc=tert-butoxycar-
bonyl, Cbz=carboxybenzyl, Ts =4-toluenesulfonyl.
Entry Catalyst Additive Solvent
T [8C] Conv. [%][b] ee [%][c]
Next, a variety of 3-nitro-1H-indole-1-carboxylates (1)
and 2,4-dienals (2) were tested to study the scope of the
reaction (Table 2). It was observed that better yields and
enantioselectivities were obtained when 2,4-dienals other
than 2a were used for the reaction with 1a (products 4e–h).
Notably, 4-phenylhepta-2,4-dienal gave excellent enantiose-
lectivity (97% ee) and a nearly pure diastereoisomer (4h).
Installing a methyl substituent at the 6-position of 1a had
a small effect on the outcome of the reaction (4i). Substrates
with an electron-withdrawing substituent at the 5-position
showed consistent reactivity and stereoselectivity when
reacting with different 2,4-dienals and provided 89–90% ee
(4j–n). During the process of expanding the substrate scope,
we observed that 4-phenylhepta-2,4-dienal gave a better yield
and enantioselectivity than 2a, which we used for optimizing
the reaction conditions. Therefore, we tested the reaction
between 3-nitroindoles, bearing N-Boc and N-Cbz protecting
groups, and 4-phenylhepta-2,4-dienal. As it appears from
Table 2, the N-Boc- and N-Cbz-protected 3-nitroindole gave
nearly the same enantioselectivity.
1
2
3a
3a
3a
3a
3b
3c
3c
3c
3c
DEA[d]
toluene
RT <1
RT >95
–
À72
À55
À79
79
81
79
75
–
–
79
69
76
DABCO toluene
DABCO toluene
DABCO CH2Cl2
DABCO CH2Cl2
DABCO CH2Cl2
DABCO CHCl3
DABCO ClCH2CH2Cl
3[e]
4
0
0
68
85
5
6
7
8
0
0
0
0
>95
>95
>95
>95
<1
9
DEA[d]
DIPEA
Et3N
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
0
10[e] 3c
0
37
11[e] 3c
0
0
>95
85
12
3c
DABCO[f] CH2Cl2
DABCO CH2Cl2
13[g] 3c
À10
>95
[a] All reactions were performed using 1a (0.05 mmol), 2a (0.1 mmol),
0.2 mL solvent, reaction time: 24 h. Then, the reaction mixture was
heated up to 408C to complete the elimination of HNO2. [b] Conversion
1
of limiting reagent was measured by H NMR analysis of the crude
reaction mixture after 24 h. [c] The ee value was determined by chiral-
phase UPC2 after reduction of 4a into the corresponding alcohol.
[d] DEA=N,N-diethylacetamide. [e] Reaction time: 72 h. [f] 20 mol%
DABCO was used. [g] Reaction time: 48 h. DABCO=1,4-diazobicyclo-
[2.2.2]octane, TFA=trifluoroacetic acid.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016, 55, 1020 –1024
ꢀ 2016 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
1021