dry over 4-Å molecular sieves. HPLC grade water was used for
injection sample preparation.
chromophore, this group not only facilitates detection in the UV
range but also plays a central role in the currently accepted model
of inclusion interaction within the cyclodextrin cavity.2
8-31
All
Instrumentation. The CZE separations were accomplished
using a BioFocus 3000 capillary electrophoresis system from Bio-
Rad. An uncoated fused silica capillary column of 50 µm i.d., with
a total length of 50 cm (45.4 cm to detector window), mounted
on a user-assembled cartridge was used. Sample injection was
achieved using the pressure mode set at 2 psi‚s. The working
potential was operated at 17 kV (+ to -, constant voltage), and
the current limit was set at 100 µA. The cartridge and carousel
temperature was preset to 20 °C. The detection wavelength was
fixed at 220 nm. The capillary column was cleaned after each
run by flushing for 2 min with the running buffer, followed by
flushing for 5 min with deionized water. Prior to storage, the
column was purged with nitrogen for 2 min. It was necessary to
clean the electrodes every five consecutive runs to remove
adsorbed salts by dipping them in methanol for 2 min.
sulfonium salts are stable for analysis in an acidic buffer.
However, the thiophenium ions, particularly S-methylthiophenium,
are subject to nucleophilic attack by water molecules27 and thus
slowly revert back to the corresponding thiophene after addition
to the buffer. The instability did not present a problem in the
time frame of the analysis. It has been shown that a strong
interaction occurs between â-CD and dibenzylmethylsulfonium
tetrafluoroborate. Studies revealed that the transformations sul-
fonium ions undergo when subjected to alkaline conditions in the
absence or presence of â-CD are different. Dibenzylmethylsul-
fonium, for example, typically undergoes Stevens rearrangement
to give a 1,2-diphenylethane derivative, but in the presence of â-CD
it undergoes a Sommelet rearrangement to give a diphenyl-
methane derivative.32 As a result of this strong interaction, â-CD
was chosen as the resolving agent for chiral separation. The first
set of chiral separations attempted were carried out using standard
parameters: acidic pH (2.50) and an uncoated capillary with
varying concentrations of â-CD in 0.1 M phosphate buffer.
Sulfonium ions containing both a benzyl and a phenyl group were
initially investigated because these groups are believed to have
the strongest interaction within the â-CD cavity.32
Synthesis of Sulfonium Salts. A modification of the proce-
dure developed by Acheson and Harrison27 was used for the
preparation of the sulfonium and thiophenium salts. In this
procedure, 1 mmol of the appropriate sulfide or thiophene and
1
.2 mmol of the corresponding iodoalkane are dissolved in
approximately 2 mL of dry DCE in a 5-mL conical vial. A DCE
solution of silver tetrafluoroborate (1.2 mmol of AgBF dissolved
4
in 1 mL of DCE) is then added dropwise over a 5-min period.
The mixture is then stirred overnight. The yellow AgI precipitate
is centrifuged and washed twice with 1 mL of acetonitrile. The
solvents are then removed by rotary vaporization at 40 °C. The
resulting oil or crystal is dried under a vacuum overnight. After
the product is thoroughly dry, the structure is confirmed by NMR
Under acidic conditions, the electroosmotic flow (EOF) is
directed toward the cathode. EOF velocities in phosphate buffers,
from pH 2.00 to 8.00, have been well established by St. Pierre
and Sentell.33 They showed that, at low pH, the EOF velocity is
relatively low. The uncharged â-CD molecules move with the
velocity of the EOF and thus can be considered to form a
pseudostationary phase.21 The net mobility of positively charged
species, which also migrate toward the cathode, is thus the
summation of the electrophoretic mobility of the ions and the EOF.
It has been shown that a number of buffer additives, particularly
tetraalkylammonium (TAA) salts and organic solvents, alter the
polarity and the viscosity of the buffer system, resulting in a
lowering of the EOF.21,34, The alteration of the EOF thus affects
the net electrophoretic mobility of the analytes, often improving
resolution but at the expense of analysis time. Reports show that
some chiral separations are achieved only in the presence of these
modifiers. Short-chain tetraalkylammonium salts effectively sup-
press or even reverse the EOF in the low pH range.21,34 Quang
and Khaledi established EOF velocities in the presence of different
TAA salts. They found that a phosphate buffer at pH 2.5
containing 50 mM TBA showed a low magnitude reversal in
EOF.34 Under these conditions, the EOF counteracts the migra-
tion of the enantiomers, thus improving resolution. Figure 2A
shows the electropherogram of a mixture of ions 1 and 2 , from
series I, with 5 mM â-CD added to the phosphate buffer. In the
absence of TBA, incomplete resolution of these ions results.
Figure 2b shows the effect of adding 50 mM TBA for the
6
analysis using acetone-d as the solvent.
Sample and Buffer P reparation. Stock solutions of the
compounds were prepared by dissolving 10-20 mg of the
sulfonium salts in 1 mL of acetonitrile. The solutions were stored
at 4 °C. The buffers used were prepared by dissolving TBA, â-CD,
and S-â-CD, in the required amounts, directly into the standard
0
.10 M phosphate buffer (pH 2.5) or the 30% methanol (v/ v) 0.10
M phosphate buffer (pH 2.5). The 30% methanol/ phosphate
buffer required the addition of NaH PO to compensate for the
2
4
dilution of the 0.10 M phosphate buffer by the addition of methanol
and the final salt concentration was brought back up to 0.10 M.
All buffers made were filtered through a 0.45-µm membrane filter
(
Gelman Sciences) prior to use. The injection samples were
prepared by diluting the necessary aliquot of the stock solution
with a 50/ 50 (v/ v) water/ appropriate running buffer for each run
to yield a final concentration of 2.5 mM. Resolution of selected
ions was calculated by using the equation
R ) 2[(t - t )/ (w + w )]
(1)
s
2
1
2
1
where t is the migration time of the enantiomers and w is the
peak width.22
(
28) Szejtli, J. Cyclodextrins and their Inclusion Complexes; Akad e´ miai Kiad o´ :
Budapest, 1982; pp 95-100, 271.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
(29) Rogan M. M.; Altria, K. D.; Goodall, D. M. Chirality 1 9 9 4 , 6, 25-40.
(
(
(
30) Leli e` vre F.; Gareil, P. Anal. Chem. 1 9 9 7 , 69, 385-392.
31) Guttman, A.; Brunet, S.; Jurado, C.; Cooke, N. Chirality 1 9 9 5 , 7, 409-414.
32) Szejtli, J. Cyclodextrins and Their Inclusion Complexes; Akad e´ miai Kiad o´ :
Budapest, 1982; p 174.
The general structures for the synthesized series of sulfonium
ions and the two thiophenium ions are shown in Figure 1. For
convenience, all compounds synthesized included at least one
(
33) St. Pierre, L. A.; Sentell, K. B. J. Chromatogr. B 1 9 9 4 , 657, 291-300.
(
27) Acheson, R. M.; Harrison, D. R. J. Chem. Soc. 1 9 7 0 , 13, 1764-1776.
614 Analytical Chemistry, Vol. 70, No. 17, September 1, 1998
(34) Quang, C.; Khaledi G. J. Chromatogr. A 1 9 9 5 , 692, 253-265.
3