2222
M. Saquib et al. / European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 46 (2011) 2217e2223
Singh, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi were
characterized biochemically and by 16S rRNA sequencing [56].
M. tuberculosis without drug. The medium was replaced every day
at same time with complete RPMI containing 1ꢂ and 2ꢂ MIC test
compound. Macrophage cells were lysed by the addition of 100 mL
6.2. BACTEC radiometric susceptibility assay
of 0.05% SDS. 100 mL lysate was sampled from three wells on day
0 and day 6 for control, test compounds at 1ꢂ MIC and 2 ꢂ MIC. The
lysate was inoculated in BACTEC vials and growth was monitored.
The protocol for macrophage infection has been described earlier
[54,55].
H37Rv strain of M. tuberculosis was grown in BACTEC 12 B vial
until the GI reached around 300. Test compounds were dissolved in
DMSO. Lyophilized Rifampin, Streptomycin and Isoniazid (Becton
Dickinson) were reconstituted as per instructions in manual in
deionized water and 0.1 mL was added into 12B medium. The final
concentration of streptomycin, isoniazid, ethambutol and rifampin
Acknowledgments
were 6, 0.4, 7.5 and 2 mg/mL respectively. Test compounds were
The authors are thankful to Sophisticated Analytical Instrument
Facility (SAIF), CDRI Lucknow, India for providing spectral data and
Mr. Anup K. Pandey for technical assistance. MS, IH, SS and PS thank
Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), New Delhi,
India for financial support. VKS thanks Department of Biotech-
nology (DBT), New Delhi, India for financial assistance. CDRI
communication no. 7847
added at varied concentrations in 0.1 mL into 12B medium. 0.1 mL
of the bacterial suspension (GI w300) was added into each of the
BACTEC 12B vial containing the drug. The control vial contained
dilute M. tuberculosis suspension 1:100 prepared by transferring
0.1 mL of the suspension into 9.9 mL of special diluting fluid and
inoculating 0.1 mL of this dilution into the control 12B vial. The vials
were incubated at 37 ꢁC ꢄ 1 ꢁC and read every day at the same time
of day on BACTEC instrument until a GI of 30 or more is achieved in
the control vial.
Appendix. Supplementary data
The difference in the GI values from the previous day and
designated as
DGI was determined for all samples and compared
Supplementary data related to this article can be found online at
with GI of the control vial. If the GI was less in the drug vial than
D
the control, the population was susceptible; if more, it was resis-
tant. MIC of a compound was defined as the lowest concentration
References
which gave negative
DGI value [57,58].
[1] Global Tuberculosis Control Epidemiology, Strategy, Financing WHO Report
[2] WHO Global Tuberculosis Programme-Revised Tuberculosis Fact Sheet (2007).
[3] Development of antituberculous drugs:current status, Kekkaku 81 (2006)
753e774. The 81st Annual Meeting Symposium.
[4] E. Vicente, R. Villar, A. Burguete, B. Solano, S. Pérez-Silanes, I. Aldana,
J.A. Maddry, A.J. Lenaerts, S.G. Franzblau, S-h. Cho, A. Monge, R.C. Goldman,
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52 (2008) 3321e3326.
6.3. Cytotoxity studies
The compounds for cytotoxicity were tested in an in vitro model
for toxicity with Vero monkey kidney cells using Resazurin assay
[53,54]. The Vero cells (ATCC CCL-81) were seeded overnight at
1 ꢂ 104e3 ꢂ 106 cells per well in 96-well plates at 37 ꢁC in RPMI
supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum and 5%
CO2. Cells were exposed to dilutions of experimental and control
drugs in triplicate for 24 h with each compound in a range of
[6] C.V. Smith, V. Sharma, J.C. Sacchettini, Tuberculosis 84 (2004) 45e55.
[7] Y. Zhang, K. Post-Martens, S. Denkin, Drug Discov. Today 11 (2006) 21e27.
[8] P. Chopra, I.S. Meena, Y. Singh, Indian J. Med. Res. 117 (2003) 1e9.
[9] S. Khasnobis, V.E. Escuyer, D. Chatterjee, Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 6 (2002)
21e40.
[10] A.H. Katz, C. E Caufield, Curr. Pharm. Des. 9 (2003) 857e866.
[11] M. McNeil, S.J. Wallner, S.W. Hunter, P.J. Brennan, Carbohydr. Res. 166 (1987)
299e308.
[12] M. Daffe, P.J. Brennan, M. McNeil, J. Biol. Chem. 265 (1990) 6734e6743.
[13] A.F. Taveira, M. Le Hyaric, E.F.C. Reis, D.P. Araujo, A.P. Ferreira, M.A. de Souza,
L.L. Alves, M.C.S. Lourenco, F.R.C. Vicente, M.V. de Almeida, Bioorg. Med. Chem.
15 (2007) 7789e7794 (and references cited therein).
[14] A.K. Pathak, V. Pathak, J.A. Maddry, W.J. Suling, S.S. Gurcha, G.S. Besra,
R.C. Reynolds, Bioorg. Med. Chem. 9 (2001) 3145e3151.
concentrations from 100 to 1.56
a control at the same concentrations. Each well had 100
test material in serially descending concentrations. After 72 h of
incubation, 10 L of resazurin indicator solution (0.1%) was added
m
g/mL. Rifampin was run as
mL of the
m
and incubation was continued for 4e5 h. The color change was
assessed visually. Any color change from purple to pink or colorless
was recorded as positive. Fluorescence of each sample was
measured with excitation wavelength at 530 nm and emission
wavelength at 590 nm using the BMG Polar Star Galaxy. CC50 values
(50% inhibitory concentrations) were calculated by plotting fluo-
rescence values using Microsoft excel template.
[15] C.A. Centrone, T.L. Lowary, Bioorg. Med. Chem. 12 (2004) 5495e5503.
[16] R.C. Reynolds, N. Bansal, J. Rose, J. Friedrich, W.J. Suling, J.A. Maddry, Carbo-
hydr. Res. 317 (1999) 164e179.
[17] R.E. Lee, M.D. Smith, L. Pickering, G.W.J. Fleet, Tetrahedron Lett. 40 (1999)
8689e8692.
6.4. In vitro efficacy of compounds in macrophages
[18] R. Pathak, A.K. Shaw, A.P. Bhaduri, K.V.G. Chandrasekhar, A. Srivastava,
K.K. Srivastava, V. Chaturvedi, R. Srivastava, B.S. Srivastava, S. Arora, S. Sinha,
Bioorg. Med. Chem. 10 (2002) 1695e1702.
[19] M. Saquib, M.K. Gupta, R. Sagar, Y.S. Prabhakar, A.K. Shaw, R. Kumar, P.R. Maulik,
A.N. Gaikwad, S. Sinha, A.K. Srivastava, V. Chaturvedi, R. Srivastava,
B.S. Srivastava, J. Med. Chem. 50 (2007) 2942e2950 (and references cited
therein).
[20] T.M. Hallis, H.-W. Liu, Acc. Chem. Res. 32 (1999) 579e588.
[21] L.M. Jarvis, Chem. Eng. News 84 (2006) 14e20.
[22] C.-H. Wong, Acc. Chem. Res. 32 (1999) 376e385.
The murine macrophage J774A.1 cells were infected with
M. tuberculosis H37Rv cells at MOI 1:20, for 6 h at 37 ꢁC and 5% CO2.
For infection, M. tuberculosis cells grown in Middlebrook 7H9
(Difco) supplemented with BSA, dextrose, catalase at 37 ꢁC with 5%
CO2 were harvested by centrifugation at 2500 ꢂ g for 10 min and
washed twice with serum free RPMI. The cells were finally resus-
pended in RPMI supplemented with 5% heat-inactivated FBS and
used for infection. The infected J774A.1 cells were seeded in trip-
licate overnight at 5 ꢂ 105 cells/well in 24 well plates at 37 ꢁC and
[23] R.O. Laing, K.M. McGoldrick, Int. J. Tuberc. Lung Dis. 4 (2000) S194eS207.
[24] A. Dove, Nat. Biotechnol. 19 (2001) 913e917.
[25] T.K. Ritter, C.-H. Wong, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 40 (2001) 3508e3533 (and
references cited therein).
5% CO2 in presence of gentamicin (50 mg/mL) to kill extracellular
[26] M. Saquib, I. Husain, S. Sharma, A.K. Shaw, M.K. Gupta, Y.S. Prabhakar,
R. Srivastava, B.S. Srivastava, Indian Patent, Reference No. 0023NF2008,
Application No. 0605DEL2008, 2008.
[27] M.K. Gupta, R. Sagar, A.K. Shaw, Y.S. Prabhakar, Bioorg. Med. Chem. 13 (2005)
343e351.
mycobacteria. Cells were washed three times in incomplete RPMI
and replaced with fresh complete RPMI medium containing test
compound at 1ꢂ and 2ꢂ MIC and incubated at 37 ꢁC and 5% CO2.
Control well contained murine macrophage cells infected with