G. Navarrete-V a zquez et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 11 (2001) 187±190
189
7
000 times more active than Metronidazole and Alben-
Regarding the anthelmintic activity of 16±22, it is inter-
esting to note that 20 had similar activity than Alben-
dazole against T. spiralis muscle larvae, and that this
compound also showed a very good activity against
both protozoa tested (Table 3).
dazole, respectively (it is known that Albendazole is not
active against E. histolytica). On the other hand, com-
pounds 19±22, with a methyl group at the 1-position,
were as active against E. histolytica as 16±22 with an H
at that position, suggesting that the H at the 1-position
is not necessary for antiprotozoal activity. The fact that
The tubulin polymerization data shown in Table 4 indi-
cate that Albendazole inhibited the polymerization of
tubulin at low concentrations, whereas 16±22 did not
upset polymerization of tubulin, even at high con-
centrations. These results support the idea that one of
the requirements for the action on tubulin of the 5(6)-
substituted benzimidazole is the presence of an hydrogen
atom at the 1-position and a methoxycarbonylamino at
19±22 had very good activity against E. histolytica, an
protozoan in which the major cytoskeleton component
is actin, instead of tubulin, suggests a dierent mechan-
ism of action from that of 2-benzimidazole carbamate
compounds.
9
Table 2. In vitro susceptibility of Giardia lamblia and Entamoeba
histolytica to compounds 16±22, Metronidazole and Albendazole
the 2-position. Compounds 16±18 have an H in the 1-
position but do not possess a methoxycarbonylamino at
the 2-position, and compounds 19±22 do not bear any
of the radicals mentioned in these positions. These facts
suggest that the mechanism of action of carbamate
benzimidazoles is dierent of that of compounds 16±22.
It means that the hydrogens in the 1- and 2-positions
are important for the binding of benzimidazoles to
tubulin but not for the antiparasitic eect.
Compound
G. lamblia IC50
mM)
E. histolytica IC50
(mM)
(
Metronidazole
Albendazole
1.220
0.037
0.107
1.282
0.078
0.064
0.042
0.127
0.260
0.350
56.330
0.069
0.022
0.011
0.040
0.046
0.008
0.033
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
6
7
8
9
0
1
2
The results obtained with compounds 16±22 as anti-
protozoal agents are very promising, since they broaden
the knowledge about the activity of these versatile deri-
vatives of benzimidazole. It is also important to
emphasize that the results of inhibition of polymeriza-
tion of tubulin give us a good idea about the dierences in
the mode of action of dierent benzimidazoles. Further
studies in this area are in progress in our laboratory.
Table 3. Percentage of viability reduction of T. spiralis muscle larvae
after 3 days of incubation with compounds 16±22 and Albendazolea
3Â10�
mM
6
3Â10
� 5
3Â10
� 4
3Â10
� 3
Compound
mM
mM
mM
Albendazole
6
nr
nr
nr
nr
2
13
1
nr
1
1
9
20
3
nr
9
30
9
b
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
Acknowledgements
nr
19
12
39
nr
15
We thank CONACyT for ®nancing project 25920M,
and DGAPA IN204998. We are grateful to Rosa Isela
Â
del Villar, Georgina Duarte, Margarita Guzman, and
9
16
nr
9
nr
2
nr
4
Marisela Gutierrez from School of Chemistry, UNAM,
Â
for the determination of all spectra. Also, we thank
Amparo Tapia for carrying out the biological assays.
a
Values are means of three experiments.
nr, no reduction observed.
b
Table 4. Eect of compounds 16±22 and Albendazole in tubulin
polymerization
References and Notes
Viscositya
1
. Cedillo-Rivera, R.; Mun
221.
. Chavez, B.; Cedillo-Rivera, R.; Martinez-Palomo, A. J.
Protozool. 1992, 39, 510.
Ä
oz, O. J. Med. Microbiol. 1992, 37,
Compound
3Â10�
5
3Â10
� 3
0.015
b
0.024
b
b
b
mM
mM
mM
mM
2
Albendazole 7.04 (Æ0.7) 2.07 (Æ0.1)
ndc
nd
3
1
. Fears, S. D.; O'Jare, J. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.
998, 32, 144.
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
6
7
8
9
0
1
2
7.55 (Æ0.3) 7.56 (Æ0.1) 7.34 (Æ0.2) 6.92 (Æ0.1)
6.59 (Æ0.6) 6.70 (Æ0.3) 7.14 (Æ0.4) 6.47 (Æ0.1)
7.00 (Æ0.2) 7.03 (Æ0.1) 6.68 (Æ0.7) 7.22 (Æ0.1)
6.68 (Æ0.9) 7.41 (Æ0.3) 7.31 (Æ0.3) 7.16 (Æ0.1)
7.30 (Æ0.2) 7.58 (Æ0.9) 6.94 (Æ0.2) 7.54 (Æ0.3)
6.44 (Æ0.8) 7.39 (Æ0.1) 7.07 (Æ0.7) 7.26 (Æ0.7)
6.93 (Æ0.6) 7.63 (Æ0.9) 6.63 (Æ0.3) 6.94 (Æ0.7)
4. Hall, A.; Nahar, Q. Trans. Roy. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg.
1993, 87, 84.
5. Romero-Cabello, R.; Robert, L.; Mun
Tanaka, J. Rev. Lat.-Amer. Microbiol. 1996, 37, 315.
. Rodriguez-Garcia, R.; Aburto-Bandala, M.; Sanchez-Mal-
donado, M. Bol. Med. Hosp. Infant. Mex. 1996, 53, 173.
Ä
oz-Garcia, R.;
6
aTubulin viscosity after the polymerization assay, without any com-
pound or Albendazole=7.66 (it represents 100% polymerization). The
incubation of tubulin with the solvent used, DMF 1%=7.42.
Values are means of three experiments, standard deviation is given in
parentheses.
7
1
. Friedman, P. A.; Platzer, E. G. Biochem. Biophys. Acta
990, 630, 271.
b
8. Reynoldson, J. A.; Thompson, R. C.; Horton, R. J. Para-
sitol. Today 1992, 9, 150.
9. Lacey, E. Int. J. Parasitol. 1998, 18, 885.
c
nd, not determined