836
T H E JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN OIL CHEN[ISTS ~ SOCIETY
VoL. 41
3
4
. Bowman, R. E, J. Chem~ See. 325 (1950).
~ Christie, W. W , t~. D, Ganstone and H. G. Prentice, Ibm. 5768
(I963).
Clutterbuek, P, W. Ibid. 2330 (1924)~
For further identification the unknown hydroxy
ester should be converted to the acetoxy ester. Using
the polyester column and 12-aeetoxystearate as stand-
ard it can be seen from Figure 1B that 14-aeetoxy
ester can be partly resolved from 12-ester if the rela-
tive amt in the mixture are suitable and that 2-,3-,4-,
5
.
6. Craig, B. M~, Chain, Ind. (London), 1442 (1960).
7. Craig, B. M, in "Gas Chromatography," 3rd Symposium, ca. by*
N. Brenner, J. E. Callen and M. B. Weiss, Academic Press Inc., New
York, 1962, pp. 37-56.
8
. Diaper, D. G. M., Can, J. Chem. 83, I720 (1955).
9
. Fiesev, L. F., and a. Szmas~kovic~, J~ Am. Chem. See. 70, 8352
1948).
0. Fischmeister, I., Arkiv KemL 18, S01 (1961).
(
15-,16-,17- and 18-acctoxy esters are partly or com-
1
pletely separated. If the unknown hydroxy ester is
converted to the oxo ester (2,11) further information
can be obtained by analysis on the QF-1 cohmm, par-
ticularly about isomers with the substituent a t posi-
tions 4-8. For this purpose it was found best to use
a 12 ft x ~4'6 in. eolunm, as was used to obtain Figure
11. Gorin, P. A, g. J. F. ~. Spencer and A. P. Tulloeh, Can. a.
ChenL gg, 846 (1961).
I2. (}reaves, W. S., R. P. Linstead, B. R. Shephard, S. L. S. Thomas
and B. C. L. Weedon, J. Chem. See. 3326 (1950).
is. Hopkins, C. Y., JAOCS 88, 664 (1961),
14 Hiinig, S, and W. Landis, Bar. 98 913 (1960).
17. Kitaggwa, I . M Sugai and F. A, Kummerow, JAOCS 89, 217
1962).
(
1
C, instead of the 6 ft x :}{6 colmnn used to o b ~ i n
the carbon numbers. Figure 1C shows that the 2-,4-,
-,I6- and 17-oxo esters M1 are separated from each
18. Magidman, P., S, F. Herb, 1¢ A. Barford and R. W, Riemen~
schneider, Ibid. 39, 137 (1962).
9, Manyik, R. M., F. C. Frostick, J. J. Sanderson and C~ R, Hauser,
J. Am. Chem. See. 75, 5030 (1953).
0. Miwa, T. K., K. L. Mikolajeaak, F, R~ Earle and I. A. Wolff,
Anal, Chem. 82, 1739 (1960).
1. Morris, L, J., F;. T. HoIraan and K~ Fontell, J. Lipid Res. 1, 412
1969).
22. Morrissette, I~. A., and W, E. Link, JAOCS 41~ 415 (1964).
8, O'Brien, J. S., and G. Rouser, Anal. Biochem. 7, 288 (1964).
4. yon Rudloff, E,, Can. J. Chem. 88, 631 (1960).
25. Ryhage, I¢, and E. Stenhagen, Arkiv KemL 15, 545 (1960)~
6~ Skogh, M., Acts Chem. Seand. 6, 809 (1952).
27. Spencer, E. Y. and G. F. Wright, J. Am. Chem. See gg, 1281
1941).
8. Stgllberg~S~nhagen, S., Arkiv Kemi. Mineral. Geol. 2OA, No, 19,
1 (1945),
9. Stork, G., A~ Brizzolara, It. Landesman, J. Szmus~kovies and R,
Terrell, J. Amo Chem~ See. 85, 297 (1963)~
0. Sweet, I¢~ S., and P~ L. Estes, J. Org. Chem. 21, 1426 (1956)~
1. Tulloeh, A, P,, B. M. Craig and G. A. Ledingham, Cam J.
MicrebioI, g, 485 (1959).
1
5
2
other and that 6mxo is partly separated from 8-oxo.
Using this column the 6- and 12-oxo esters are con>
pletety separated, 7- and 12-oxo esters are partly sep-
arated and 8-oxo ester frames a pronounced shoulder
on the 12-oxo ester peak. Thus by using a combina.
tion of the three types of oxygenated ester and the
three columns 2-,3-,4-,5-,6~,7-,8-,14~,15-,16~,17- and 18-
isomers can be identified using the 12-isomer as a
known standard but the 9~,10~,11- and 13dsomers can-
not be characterized in this way.
2
(
(
2
2
2
2
2
8
3
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
3
2, Tulloeh, A. P. J. F. T, Spencer and P. A, J, Gorin, 0an, J.
Many useful discussions with B~ M. Craig and E~ yon gudloff; L~ L.
Hoffman for ~ble experimental assistance. NMR and IB, spectra by W.
Haid.
Chem. 40, 1326 (1962),
38. Tulloch, A, P. ,and J, F. T. Spencer, Ibid. 42, 880 (1964),
34. VandenHeuvel, W. J, A., E. ~. A. Haahti and E, C. Horning,
J. Am. Chem. See. 83, 1513 (1961).
3
1960).
REFERENCES
5. Woodford, F. P., and C. M. van Gent, a. Lipid Res. 1, 188
(
1
. Bans, E~ M. and W. R. Mcbride, Anal. Chem. 51, 1879 (1959).
. Bergstrgm, S., G. Aulin-Erdtman. B, Rolander, E, Stenhagen and
2
S, (tstling, Aeta Chem. Seand. 6, 1157 (1952).
[Received June 22, I964--Accepted August 10, 1964]
of
Mixtures DEAE
With
Cellulose Column
GEORGE ROUSER, CLAUDIO GALLI and ELLEN LIEBER, City of Hope Medical Center,
Department of Biochemistry, Duarte, California; and
M. L. BLANK and O. S. P R I V E t , The Hormel Institute, University of Minnesota, Austin, Minnesota
Abstract
servations of Borgstrgm (1), Fillerup and Mead (2),
Barren and Hanahan (3) and Lea e t a l . (4). Di-
ethylaminoethyl ( D E A E ) cellulose column cbroma-
togr~)hy was introduced by Rouser et al. (5) to elimi-
slate the problem of the elution of acidic lipids with
other lipid classes encountered with silicic acid col
mnn chromatography, D E A E column chromatography
combined with si]idc acid eohlmn chromatography and
with silieic aeid~silicate column chromatography was
used to obtain separation of nmst lipid classes of brain
(5,6) and other mixtures (6). Recently, Privett and
Blank (7) and Blank et aL (8) have greatly extended
the possibilities of TLC for quantitative applications.
These investigators demonstrated that a spray reagent
composed of HAS04 and potassium diehromate can be
used to char spots obtained by TLC to a reproducible
optical density. Under proper conditions the extent
of charring is independent of the degree of unsatura-
lion of lipid classes such as lecithin and sphingomye-
lin, can be made to give a linear response over a fairly
wide concentration range, and is readily determined
by transmission densitometry.
A
quantitative chromatographic procedure for
the fractionation of complex lipid mixtures is de-
scribed. The method utilizes diethylaminoethyl
(
D E A E ) cellulose column chromatography fol-
h)wed by thin layer chromatography (TLC).
Spots produced in TI~C are charred with Slflfuric
acid~pctassiunl dichromate and heat and are then
measured by quantitative densitometry. Results
obtained with beef brain and beef heart n/ito-
ehondrial lipids are presented, and the close cor-
respondence between column isolation procedures
and the new procedure is demonstrated. Methods
utilizing only column chromatography, column
chromatography and TLC, and one- and two-
dimensional TLC without column chromatogra-
phy are compared.
Introduction
It~MATOGRAPHIC PROCEDUR~ :S are ~21idely used for
C
the determination of lipid class composition. St-
lisle add column chromatography has been the most
commonly utilized approach based on the initial ob~
The present report describes a new approaeh to