8
Tetrahedron
3
−1
1
2
941, 1697, 1593, 1464 cm ; H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl ) δ
MeOH (3 mL). This washing process was repeated fourteen
1
8
7
7
1
1
.17–8.15 (m, 1H), 8.10–8.07 (m, 1H), 7.97–7.92 (m, 2H), 7.76–
.68 (m, 4H), 3.63 (dd, J = 129.9, 14.8 Hz, 1H), 2.95 (dd, J = 7.8,
.8 Hz, 1H), 2.81 (ddd, J = 129.9, 14.8, 7.8 Hz, 1H), 1.69 (d, J =
29.9 Hz, 3H); C{ H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl ) δ 134.6, 134.5,
34.2, 127.52, 127.47, 127.1, 127.0, 29.0, 18.0 (The signals
times to give 11′ (13.4 mg, 27%). The H NMR spectrum of 11′
was identical with that of our authentic sample.
13
1
4.13. Sodium 2-(2-(methoxycarbonyl)benzoyl)-3-methyl-4,9-
dioxo-4,9-dihydro-1H-cyclopenta[b]naphthalenide (16)
3
derived from other carbons were not observed, because the
A 0.5 M NaOMe solution in MeOH (5.00 mL, 2.50 mmol)
was added to 14 (10.0 mg, 29.2 ꢀmol). The resultant mixture was
stirred at rt under an oxygen atmosphere for 30 min. The reaction
was quenched by the addition of water, and the resulting mixture
was diluted with EtOAc. The aqueous layer was extracted with
EtOAc. The combined organic layer was collected, washed with
water and brine, dried over Na SO , and concentrated. The
13
signals of the C-labeled carbons were greatly enhanced);
+
HRMS (FAB/double-focusing MS) m/z: [M+H] Calcd for
12
13
C20 C H O 361.0987; Found 361.0984.
2
15
5
1
3
4
5
.10. 5a-(Methyl- C)-12,12a-dihydro-5H-dibenzo[b,h]fluorene-
13
,6,11,13(5aH)-tetraone-12- C (14′)
2
4
Iodine (37.0 mg, 0.291 mmol) and PPh (75.9 mg, 0.289
residue was purified via silica gel chromatography using
hexanes/EtOAc (2/1) and EtOAc/MeOH (10/1) as the eluents to
afford 16 (8.0 mg, 69%) as an orange amorphous solid. Mp = 180
°C (decomposition); IR (KBr) νmax = 2924, 1722, 1711, 1579,
3
mmol) were added to a solution of 10′ (19.7 mg, 54.7 ꢀmol) in
MeCN (3 mL) at rt. The mixture was refluxed by heating in an
oil bath for 19 h. The reaction was quenched by the addition of
water, and the resulting mixture was diluted with EtOAc. The
organic layer was collected, washed with water and brine, dried
over Na SO , and concentrated. The residue was purified via
−1
1
1550, 1493, 1483, 1444, 1427, 1385 cm ; H NMR (400 MHz,
CD OD) δ 8.06 (d, J = 7.4 Hz,1H), 7.99 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H), 7.93
3
(d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.63 (dd, J = 7.7, 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.55–7.50 (m,
3H), 7.44 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 6.71 (s, 1H), 3.69 (s, 3H), 2.81 (s,
2
4
silica gel chromatography using hexanes/EtOAc (10/1) as the
eluent to afford 14′ (13.3 mg, 70%) as a pale brown amorphous
13
1
3H); C{ H} NMR (100 MHz, CD OD) δ 196.7, 182.5, 180.8,
3
solid. IR (KBr) ν = 2956, 2925, 2854, 1685, 1666, 1618, 1593,
169.0, 145.9, 142.0, 139.5, 138.5, 132.9, 132.7, 132.5, 130.9,
130.7, 130.5, 129.8, 129.1, 128.0, 127.1, 126.9, 125.3, 125.1,
52.7, 15.5; HRMS (FAB/double-focusing MS) m/z: [M−Na]
max
−1
1
1
7
456 cm ; H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl ) δ 8.13–8.04 (m, 4H),
.81–7.70 (m, 4H), 3.48 (ddd, J = 130.6, 18.2, 8.6 Hz, 1H), 3.43
3
–
(
m, 1H), 3.06 (ddd, J = 130.6, 18.2, 8.2 Hz, 1H), 1.85 (d, J =
Calcd for C H O 371.0921; Found 371.0920, and m/z:
23
15
5
13
1
+
1
1
2
30.6 Hz, 3H); C{ H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl ) δ 135.1, 134.4,
[M+Na] Calcd for C H O Na 417.0715; Found 417.0719.
3
23 15 5 2
33.9, 133.6, 127.7, 127.1, 126.7, 126.2, 33.7 (d, J = 1.1 Hz),
2.4 (d, J = 1.1 Hz) (The unassigned signal at 127.3 ppm was
Acknowledgments
also observed. The signals derived from other carbons were not
1
3
observed, because the signals of the C-labeled carbons were
This study was supported by Japan Society for the Promotion
of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI (No. 18K19185) and the
Sumitomo Foundation (No. 170183) to K.K.
greatly enhanced); HRMS (FAB/double-focusing MS) m/z:
M+H] Calcd for C20 C H O 345.1037; Found 345.1037.
+
12
13
[
2 15 4
13
4
5
.11. 6-Hydroxy-12-(methyl- C)-5H-dibenzo[b,h]fluorene-
,11,13-trione-5a- C (11′)
13
References
1
2
.
.
For a review on total syntheses of natural dimeric
naphthoquinones, see: S. Kamo, K. Kuramochi, K. Tsubaki,
Tetrahedron Lett. 59 (2018) 224–230.
R. H. Thomson, Naturally Occurring Quinones IV. Blackie
Academic & Professional, London, 1997.
A mixture of 14′ (14.4 mg, 41.8 ꢀmol) in TBAB (703 mg,
.18 mmol) was heated at 130 °C in an oil bath under an aerobic
2
atmosphere for 6 h. The mixture was diluted with EtOAc and
water. After the layers were separated, the organic layer was
washed with a 3 M aqueous H SO solution, water and brine,
2
4
3. Y. Kumagai, Y. Shinkai, T. Murata, A. K. Cho, Annu. Rev.
Pharmacol. Toxicol. 52 (2012) 221–247.
4
dried over Na SO , and concentrated. The residue was diluted
2
4
.
I. Baxter, D. W. Cameron, R. B. Titman, J. Chem. Soc. C (1971)
253–1256.
with MeOH (3 mL) and centrifuged (4000 rpm, 1 min). After the
supernatant was removed, the precipitate was washed with
MeOH (3 mL). This washing process was repeated fifteen times
to give 11′ (4.1 mg, 29%) as a red purple solid. Mp = >250 °C;
1
5
.
S. Azuma, K. Nishio, K. Kubo, T. Sasamori, N. Tokitoh, K.
Kuramochi, K. Tsubaki, J. Org. Chem. 77 (2012) 4812−4820.
6. S. Azuma, M. Ota, A. Ishida, K. Isozaki, H. Takaya, M. Nakamura,
T. Sasamori, N. Tokitoh, K. Kuramochi, K. Tsubaki, Chem. Lett.
42 (2013) 1531−1533.
7. M. Ota, T. Sasamori, N. Tokitoh, T. Onodera, Y. Mizushina, K.
Kuramochi, K. Tsubaki, J. Org. Chem. 80 (2015) 5687−5695.
8. N. Vets, H. Diliёn, S. Toppet, W. Dehaen, Synlett 2006,
1359−1362.
−1
IR (KBr) ν =3443, 3068, 3030, 2922, 1666, 1622, 1593 cm ;
max
1
H NMR (400 MHz,CDCl ) δ 18.09 (s, 1H), 8.28–8.24 (m, 4H),
3
13
1
8
(
.28–7.71 (m, 4H), 2.96 (d, J = 129.48 Hz, 3H); C{ H} NMR
100 MHz, CDCl ) δ 135.0, 133.0, 127.8, 127.2, 125.4 (d, J = 2.8
3
Hz), 14.2 (d, J = 2.8 Hz) (The unassigned signal at 127.4 ppm
was also observed. The signals derived from other carbons were
not observed, because the signals of C-labeled carbons were
9. S. Maruo, K. Nishio, T. Sasamori, N. Tokitoh, K. Kuramochi, K.
Tsubaki, Org. Lett. 15 (2013) 1556−1559.
13
1
0. P. Wasserscheid, W. Keim, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 39 (2000)
772–3789.
11. T. Welton, Chem. Rev. 99 (1999) 2071–2083.
greatly enhanced); HRMS (FAB/double-focusing MS) m/z: [M–
3
–
12
13
H] Calcd for C20 C H O 341.0724; Found 341.0722.
2
11
4
1
1
2. J. P. Hallett, T. Welton, Chem. Rev. 111 (2011) 3508–3576.
3. M. Yao, H. Senoh, T. Sakai, T. Kiyobayashi, Int. J. Electrochem.
Sci. 6 (2011) 2905–2911.
4. M. Yao, S. Yamazaki, H. Senoh, T. Sakai, T. Kiyobayashi, Mater.
Sci. Eng. B. 177 (2012) 483–487.
4
.12. Synthesis of 11′ from 9′
A mixture of 9′ (49.8 mg, 0.288 mmol) in TBAB (0.93 g, 2.89
1
mmol) was heated at 130 °C in an oil bath under an aerobic
atmosphere for 9 h. The mixture was diluted with EtOAc and
water. After the layers were separated, the organic layer was
washed with a 3 M aqueous H SO solution, water and brine,
dried over Na SO , and concentrated. The residue was diluted
with MeOH (4 mL) and centrifuged (3500 rpm, 2 min). After the
supernatant was removed, the precipitate was washed with
15. M. Yao, H. Ando, T. Kiyobayashi, Energy Procedia 89 (2016)
222–230.
1
6. L. Miao, L. Liu, Z. Shang, Y. Li, Y. Lu, F. Cheng, J. Cheng, Phys.
Chem. Chem. Phys. 20 (2018) 13478–13484.
7. D. R. Maulding, B. G. Roberts, J. Org. Chem. 34 (1969) 1734–
2
4
2
4
1
1
736.