Fig. 2 Molar fraction of TBBN partitioned in SDS micelles in the
presence of different DM-b-CD/SDS concentrations.
Fig. 3 Mobility data of tert-butyl benzyl ketone as a function of the
SDS concentration and the nature of cyclodextrin employed.
concentration of DM-b-CD is so much so that ([CD] +
cmcreal) 4 [SDS], the EPR spectrum can be correctly simu-
lated by admitting that a sizeable fraction of the probe is still
experiencing a hydrophobic environment. While the dramatic
reduction of the residence time of the radical guest in the micelle
suggests that the micellar structure is altered significantly in the
presence of methylated cyclodextrins, the existence of radicals
dissolved in an hydrophobic aggregate for concentration of SDS
below cmcapp (cmcapp = cmcreal + CD) indicate that this altered
micelle is still able to solubilise the probe. According to recent
found with b-CD, in the presence of SDS between 20 and 28
mM, that is below the hypothetical cmcapp ([DM-b-CD] +
cmcreal = 28 mM) the transport ability of the micellar carrier
is still maintained with DM-b-CD, this being an indication
that a modified micellar carrier is present in the solution as
predicted by EPR measurements. Work is in progress to
investigate the effect of methylated CDs on the CE-based
separation of enantiomers when the SDS concentration is in
the premicellar range.
In conclusion, the combined use of selected nitroxide and
EPR spectroscopy has been proved to be suitable for studying
the partitioning rate of a given substrate in CD–micelle
systems. On the condition that the spectroscopic parameters
of the probe are sufficiently different to distinguish the differ-
ent environment experienced by the radical, EPR data can be
employed to predict the partitioning behaviour of non radical
analytes in mixed organised systems. We foresee the potential
role of EPR in extending the utility of this technique by using
13
findings by Dreiss and coworkers we can suppose that the
presence of methylated cyclodextrins results in a lowering of the
aggregation number, and in an increase of solvent penetration
and polydispersivity of the micelle.
From an applicative point of view we checked if the
residence time of the probe in each environment determined
by EPR could be employed to predict the electrophoretic
behaviour of a given analyte. Capillary electrophoretic (CE)
analysis of neutral solutes in CD-micellar systems is based on
the differences in the mobility of the analytes in the homo-
geneous phase. The anionic SDS micelle acts as a carrier and
the inclusion of the solutes into the neutral CD cavity is a
process in competition with the partitioning into the micelle.
When the residence time of the probe in the cyclodextrin is
long compared with the residence time in the micelle, the
mobility of the neutral probe approaches to zero; this condi-
tion is also observed when surfactant concentration is below
the critical micelle concentration.
1
4
probes characterized by a different lipophilicity or contain-
5
ing a chiral centre.
1
Notes and references
1
P. Mukhopadhyay, P. Y. Zavaliji and L. Isaacs, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
006, 128, 14093.
2
2 A. Petrov, V. Okhonin, M. Berezovski and S. N. Krilov, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 17104.
3
4
5
6
C.-E. Lin, H.-C. Huang and H.-W. Weng, J. Chromatogr. A, 2001,
17, 297.
9
L. Garcıa-Rıo, J. R. Leis, J. C. Mejuto and J. Perez-Juste, J. Phys.
CE experiments were performed by analyzing the electro-
phoretic behaviour of tert-butyl benzyl ketone, the diamag-
netic analogue of TBBN, in the presence of either b-CD and
DM-b-CD at 16 and 20 mM, respectively. SDS was supplemen-
ted as a micelle separation carrier in a wide concentration range
´
Chem. B, 1998, 102, 4581.
´
´
Y. Suzaki, T. Taira, D. Takeuchi and K. Osakada, Org. Lett.,
2007, 9, 887.
Y. Rharbi and M. A. Winnik, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2002, 124, 2082.
7 K. A. Connors, Chem. Rev., 1997, 97, 1325.
8
9
M. Lucarini and B. P. Roberts, Chem. Commun., 1996, 1577.
M. Lucarini, B. Luppi, G. F. Pedulli and B. P. Roberts,
Chem.–Eur. J., 1999, 5, 2048.
(
e
15–165 mM) and the effective electrophoretic mobility (m ) of
the probe was plotted against the SDS concentration (Fig. 3).
As expected, in the absence of cyclodextrin only small
mobility variations were observed in the investigated SDS
range, while, in the presence of b-CD, the mobility variation
profile shows a marked break point which corresponds to a
1
0 G. Brigati, P. Franchi, M. Lucarini, G. F. Pedulli and L. Valgi-
migli, Res. Chem. Intermed., 2002, 28, 131.
1
1
1 A. Hudson and G. R. Luckhurst, Chem. Rev., 1969, 69, 191.
2 A. B. Dorrego, L. Garcıa-Rıo, P. Herves, J. R. Leis, J. C. Mejuto
´ ´ ´
and J. Perez-Juste, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2000, 39, 2945.
´
surfactant concentration below cmcapp ([b-CD] + cmcreal
=
13 J. Joseph, C. A. Dreiss, T. Cosgrove and J. S. Pedersen, Langmuir,
2007, 23, 460.
2
4 mM). In the presence of DM-b-CD the effective mobility of
1
4 M. Lucarini, P. Franchi, G. F. Pedulli, P. Pengo, P. Scrimin and L.
Pasquato, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 9326.
the carbonyl probe is significantly reduced. According to EPR
data this should be attributed to the reduced residence time of
the probe in the micellar pseudo-phase. Conversely to that
1
5 P. Franchi, M. Lucarini, E. Mezzina and G. F. Pedulli, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 4343.
This journal is ꢂc The Royal Society of Chemistry 2008
Chem. Commun., 2008, 1311–1313 | 1313