332
M. Bessodes et al.
TABLE 1. Inhibition (%) of cathepsin D and HIV protease I
tions, this could suggest that cellular uptake of these
compounds remains a limiting factor in their action, and
thus improvement in their membrane permeation should be
considered. On the other hand, since tripeptides are ac-
tively absorbed through the transepithelial barrier of the
gastrointestinal track, these new products could be prom-
ising as orally absorbed inhibitors of extracellular cathepsin
D and as such for the therapy of some invasive tumors and
metastases or for inflammation treatment.
by the tripeptides containing statine derivatives
Cathepsin D
inhibition
(%)
HIV protease
inhibition
(%)
Compound (mM)
V-V analogs
8 10Ϫ5
20
ND
91
25
99
31
99
32
99
28
9
24
22
11
8
10Ϫ7
9 10Ϫ5
(S-S) 10Ϫ7
15 10Ϫ5
(S-S) 10Ϫ7
18 10Ϫ5
This work was supported by the CNRS and Rhoˆne-Poulenc Rorer. We
thank the Association pour la Recherche sur le Cancer (ARC) for
financial support. We are grateful to D. Derocq for his excellent
assistance in proliferation studies.
(S-S) 10Ϫ7
21 10Ϫ5
(S-S) 10Ϫ7
V-F analogs
11 10Ϫ5
93
13
12
8
References
(S-S) 10Ϫ7
12 10Ϫ5
1. Alexander DS, Aimes RT and Quigley JP, What structure and
function of avian plasminogen activator and matrix metallo-
proteinase-2 reveal about their counterpart mammalian en-
zymes, their regulation and their role in tumor invasion.
Enzyme Protein 49: 38–58, 1996.
2. Wilson CL and Matrisian LM, Matrilysin: An epithelial
matrix metalloproteinase with potentially novel functions. Int
J Biochem Cell Biol 28: 123–136, 1996.
3. Stetler-Stevenson WG, Hewitt R and Corcoran M, Matrix
metalloproteinases and tumor invasion: From correlation and
causality to the clinic. Semin Cancer Biol 7: 147–154, 1996.
4. Schwartz GK, Invasion and metastases in gastric cancer: In
vitro and in vivo models with clinical correlations. Semin Oncol
23: 316–324, 1996.
5. Rochefort H, Cathepsin D in breast cancer: A tissue marker
associated with metastasis. Eur J Cancer 28A: 1780–1783,
1992.
Ͻ4
ND
98
(R-R) 10Ϫ7
16 10Ϫ5
22
17
(S-S) 10Ϫ7
19 10Ϫ5
17
98
(S-S) 10Ϫ7
24
V-W analogs
13 10Ϫ5
94
6
20
ND
97
9
13
13
11
(S-S) 10Ϫ7
14 10Ϫ5
(R-R) 10Ϫ7
17 10Ϫ5
(S-S) 10Ϫ7
20 10Ϫ5
95
23
(S-S) 10Ϫ7
Valine-valine V-V; valine-phenylalanine V-F; valine tryptophane V-W. ND, not
determined.
6. Ferrandina G, Scambia G, Bardelli F et al, Relationship
between cathepsin D content and disease-free survival in
node-negative breast cancer patients: A meta-analysis. Br J
Cancer 76: 661–666, 1997.
HIV protease using the synthetic peptide as substrate.
These results (Table 1) confirmed the stereoselectivity of
the inhibition (compounds 11–13, [S-S]; 12–14, [R-R])
and showed the influence of the amino acid residue next to
the statine derivative (9-15-18, Val; 11-16-19, Phe; and
13-17-20, Trp). The Val-Val sequence corresponding to
pepstatine (9-15-18-21) was the most active of the three
series synthesized with different statine analogs, exempli-
7. Foekens JA, Look MP and Bolt-de Vries J, Cathepsin D in
primary breast cancer: Prognostic evaluation involving 2810
patients. Br J Cancer 79: 300–307, 1999.
8. Liaudet E, Garcia M and Rochefort H, Cathepsin D matura-
tion and its stimulatory effect on metastasis are prevented by
addition of KDEL retention signal. Oncogene 9: 1145–1154,
1994.
9. Liaudet E, Derocq D, Rochefort H and Garcia M, Transfected
cathepsin D stimulates high density cancer cell growth by
inactivating secreted growth inhibitors. Cell Growth Differ 6:
1045–1052, 1995.
10. Vignon F, Capony F, Chambon M, Freiss G, Garcia M and
Rochefort H, Autocrine growth stimulation of the MCF7
breast cancer cells by the estrogen-regulated 52KD protein.
Endocrinology 118: 1537–1545, 1986.
11. Fusek M and Vetvicka V, Mitogenic function of the human
procathepsin D: The role of the propeptide. Biochem J 303:
775–780, 1994.
12. Laurent-Matha V, Farnoud MR, Lucas C, Garcia M and
Rochefort H, Endocytosis of procathepsin D in breast cancer
cells is mostly independent of mannose-6-phosphate recep-
tors. J Cell Sci 111: 2539–2549, 1998.
13. Umezawa H, Aoyagi T, Morishima H, Matsuzaki M, Hamada
H and Takeuchi T, Pepstatin, a new pepsin inhibitor pro-
duced by Actinomycetes. J Antibiot 23: 259–262, 1970.
14. Kunimoto S, Aoyagi T, Nishizawa R, Komai T, Takeuchi T
fied by an IC of 480 nM for 9 (Val-Val containing
50
tripeptide) compared to 2.8 M for 17 (Val-Trp containing
tripeptide). All the compounds tested were 100 times less
inhibitory to HIV-1 protease than to cathepsin D, thus
displaying interesting selectivity properties.
The tripeptide derivatives of the compounds described
showed good inhibitory property and interesting selectivity
with cathepsin D compared to another aspartyl protease,
the HIV protease. Furthermore, significant effectiveness
against cancer cell proliferation at relatively high concen-
trations (50 M) was evidenced. These concentrations
appeared at least 50-fold higher than those inhibiting
cathepsin D-induced proteolysis in vitro. Although a non-
specific effect cannot be excluded at such high concentra-