X.-F. Zhang et al. / Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry 349 (2017) 197–206
203
9
ꢃ1
phenyl in Ph-BDP is freely rotating along the C ꢃꢃ C bond that links
the phenyl and the BODIPY core. The rotation process is so quick
that it consumes 98% of the energy of the excited state since the
fluorescence emission efficiency is only 1.8% in methanol. The
maximum rate constant of internal conversion (kic) can be
in Table 1. Comparing to k
dominating for NO -CPh-BDP S
f
(0.12 ꢂ10 s ), PET process is
1
state which has a much faster
2
PET rate than others. This PET process explains why
decreased by the presence of the substituents.
f
F is largely
If the above mechanism is true, we can quantitatively predict
correctly. Since = k /(k /(k + ket) for R-CPh-
+ kic + kisc + ket) ffik
BDP compounds (R = Me, COOH, NO ), k is an constant from BDP,
using ket values computed from , we can then obtain as 0.62,
0.28, and 0.034 for R = Me, COOH, NO respectively. These values
F
f
10 ꢃ1
estimated to be 0.54 ꢂ10
s
(kic ffiknr = 1/
t
f
ꢃk
f
,
t
f
= 0.18 ns of
F
f
f
f
f
f
the main component), which is 39 times faster than the emissive
2
f
9
ꢃ1
rate constant (0.14 ꢂ10 s ).
t
f
F
f
Interestingly, CPh-BDP fluorescence decay displays the mono-
exponential behaviour in all solvents, and the lifetime varies from
2
are excellently agreement with the measured values in methanol
(Table 1). This agreement also indicates that kic and kisc are indeed
4.86 to 5.73 ns, much longer than that of Ph-BDP (0.18–0.35 ns). The
introduction of a COOH at the ortho-position of the phenyl has a
tremendous effect to hinder the fast free rotation for two reasons:
very small compared to k
The presence of PET is also supported by the thermodynamic
evidence, since the driving force, the free energy change of PET, G,
f
and ket.
1) geometrical hindrance, 2) hydrogen bonding between COOH
D
and 1-H on the xanthene ring. Both interactions co-act and cause
the rotation to be much slower than the emissive process.
Although CPh-BDP shows much longer fluorescence lifetime
than Ph-BDP, but its value is still smaller than that of BDP. Is it due
to the rotation of m-carboxyphenyl (CPh)? The monoexponential
decay behaviour of CPh-BDP indicates that it is not due to the
rotation, otherwise, the decay would be biexponential as that for
Ph-BDP.
is indeed a negative value.
D
G of PET is calculated by Eq. (2)
D
G = EOX(D/D ) ꢃER(Aꢃ/A) ꢃE
+
S
ꢃC,
(2)
+
in which E
ER(A
OX(D/D )
is the oxidation potential for an electron donor D,
ꢃ
/A)
S
is the reduction potential of an electron acceptor A, E is the
energy for the lowest excited singlet state, and C is a solvent
dependent small constant (ꢆ0.06 eV).
E
S
is ꢆ2.55 eV for the BODIPYs. The C H COOH shows a
6 5
The fluorescence decay of R-CPh-BDP (R = NO
2
, COOH, Me, Br
4
)
reduction wave at ꢃ1.75 V. BODIPY has an oxidation potential of
compounds can be compared with that of CPh-BDP. These
compounds mostly show biexponential emission decay, but the
0.80 V. With the photo excitation, the excited BODIPY moiety is the
donor while benzoate is the acceptor, since the
computed to be negative (
this small negative value indicates that PET can occur in CPh-BDP.
The electronic withdrawing COOH- and NO -substituted benzoic
acid must have an even lower reduction potential than C H COOH,
DG of PET is
t
f
of the long-lived components can be larger than that of BDP,
suggesting that the long-lived emission components are not
originated from the excited singlet state S but from another meta-
DG = 0.80 + 1.75–2.50–0.06 = ꢃ0.01 eV),
1
2
ꢅ+ ꢅꢃ
d
+
dꢃ
stable state D -A or D -A (charge separation state formed by
PET or charge transfer state by PCT). The mechanism is shown in
6
5
which makes the PET more favorite. In particular, NO2 benzoate
G value
Fig. 6 (h
The short-lived components of R-CPh-BDP (R = NO
) are due to S emission. The short lifetime is also strongly
dependent on the solvent polarity, for example, of NO -CPh-BDP
n
2
).
shows a reduction potential at ꢃ0.92 V, which results in a
D
2
, COOH, Me,
of ꢃ0.84 V. This means in NO -CPh-BDP, PET can occur from
2
Br
4
1
t
1
BODIPY moiety to NO -benzoate fair easily (Fig. 6).
2
t
1
2
Fig. 7 shows the absorption spectra and chemical kinetic curves
is 3.00, 0.71, 0.69, 0.64 and 0.28 ns in n-hexane, DCM, ethanol,
acetonitrile and methanol, respectively. This means the higher the
solvent polarity is, the shorter the lifetime is. This solvent effect
strongly supports the presence of PET or PCT.
of photosensitized oxidation of DPBF in the presence of BODIPY
derivative. DPBF is the specific chemical trapper of singlet oxygen,
it showed rapid decomposition only in the co-presence of a
BODIPY, light irradiation and molecular oxygen. On the other hand,
DPBF absorption showed no change if anyone of the BODIPY,
The existence of PET (with the rate constant of ket) competes
with emissive process and shortens the
t
f
, since
t
f
= (k
f
+ kic + kisc
+
oxygen, or the light was absent. Br -CPh-BDP showed the highest
ability to decompose DPBF, apparently due to the heavy atom effect
4
ꢃ1
k
et
)
. We can then compute ket by Eq. (1):
0,
of Br atom which leads to the T
most efficient photosensitizer is NO
ciently enhances the formation of CSS (charge separated state),
which is the precursor of T
The photo stability of the BODIPYs was tested by monitoring the
absorbance at 510 nm in ethanol, for which the samples were
irradiated by a 450 W Xenon lamp with a 505 nm filter. The results
1
formation efficiently. The second
k
et = 1/
t
f
ꢃ1/
t
f
(1)
2
-CPh-BDP, since NO effi-
2
0
in which
t
f
is the lifetime of BDP. Only ket value in methanol can be
values of BDP in other solvents are
calculated, since the
unknown. The ket value is 0.041, 0.072, 0.32, and 3.43 ꢂ10 s for
R-CPh-BDP (R = H, Me, COOH, NO ) respectively. Please note that
the ket values are obtained without using the measured values
t
f
1
.
9
ꢃ1
2
F
f
1 2 1 2 0 1
Fig. 6. Left: Donor-Acceptor pairs of the BODIPYs. Right: Fluorescence (hn , hn ), PET, and T forming processes for R-CPh-BDP compounds (R = NO ). S : ground state, S :
excited singlet state, T : excited triplet state, CSS: charge separation state, CR: charge recombination, PET: photo induced electron transfer.
1