= 108.1431(15), g = 106.6735(14)°, V = 6268.0(2) Å3, Z = 2, m(Mo-Ka)
= 0.2 mm21, 80242 reflections measured, 14833 independent, Rint
=
0.1352, (1.6° < q < 24.1°, T = 150 K). Only Si atoms were refined with
anisotropic displacement parameters. The outside of the molecule shows
considerable dynamic disorder, which gives rise to high displacement
parameters and unrealistic geometries. No satisfactory disorder models
could be obtained. Mild distance restraints were introduced for the most
unrealistic parameters. wR2 = 0.2949, R1 = 0.1369, S = 0.886, 20.38 <
Dr < 0.78 e Å23. CCDC 182/1331. See http://www.rsc.org/suppdata/cc/
1999/1623/ for crystallographic files in .cif format.
§ Selected data for 4: 1H NMR (CDCl3): d 7.5 (m, 16H, ArH), 7.3 (m, 24H,
ArH), 1.40 (s, 8H, SiCH2P), 0.26 (s, 16H, SiCH2CH2Si), 20.10 (s, 24H,
SiCH3). 31P-{1H} NMR (CDCl3): d 220.8. Dendrimers 5 and 6 have
similar NMR spectra. For 7: 1H NMR (CDCl3): d 7.5–7.1 (m, 80H, ArH),
1.26 (s br, 16H, SiCH2P), 0.19 (m, 16H, SiCH2CH2Si), 20.29 (s br, 12H,
SiCH3). 31P-{1H} NMR (CDCl3): d 222.5. Dendrimer 8 has similar NMR
spectra.
Fig. 2 Space time yield versus amount of solvent pumped through the
reactor of the continuous allylic alkylation reaction in a membrane
reactor.‡‡
¶ Room temperature, solvent: THF, [allyl trifluoroacetate] = 50 mM,
[diethyl methylmalonate] = 25 mM, [Pd] = 12.5 mM.
∑ Koch/SelRO MPF-60 NF membrane, Koch Membrane Systems, Düssel-
dorf, Germany, molecular weight cut-off (MWCO) = 400 Daltons.
** Room temperature, reactor volume: 20 ml, solvent: THF, [allyl
trifluoroacetate] = 50 mM, [diethyl methylmalonate] = 25 mM, [Pd] =
the nucleophile. Addition of a second portion of substrate after
nearly full consumption of the sodium diethyl methylmalonate
(over 90%) showed that the catalyst remained active.
These novel dendrimeric catalysts were studied in a continuous
process using a membrane reactor.∑ A solution of allyl
trifluoroacetate and sodium diethyl methylmalonate in THF
(including n-decane as an internal standard) was pumped
through the reactor. The allylpalladium complex of the largest
dendrimer with bidentate phosphines (8) was used as a
catalyst.**
12.5 mM, flow rate: 44 ml h21
.
†† Much higher turnover numbers can be reached in a batch reactor
compared to the membrane reactor, showing that in the membrane reactor
new problems are introduced that are not related to the dendrimeric
catalyst.
‡‡ The space time yield has been corrected for the background reaction.
In Fig. 2 the space time yield is plotted as a function of the
amount of solvent (expressed in reactor volumes) pumped
through the reactor. The reaction started immediately after
addition of the catalyst and reached its maximum space time
yield after one reactor volume. The space time yield slowly
dropped to zero after ca. 153 the reactor volume of substrate
solution had been pumped through the reactor. Regarding the
size of the catalyst, this decrease was unexpectedly rapid. The
retention in the membrane reactor of the second generation
dendrimer (molecular volume: 2414 Å3), which is much smaller
than the Pd catalyst (calculated molecular volume: ≈ 7600 Å3
(Fig. 1)), was determined to be 98.1%. Using this number the
decrease in catalyst activity is calculated to be only 25% after
flushing the reactor fifteen times. The observed decrease in
catalyst activity is therefore ascribed to decomposition†† of the
palladium compound and not to loss of the dendrimeric catalyst.
This is in agreement with the observation that samples taken
from the product flow were not catalytically active, indicating
that no active catalyst had gone through the membrane.
In conclusion, carbosilane dendrimers functionalised with
diphenylphosphine groups at the periphery have been syn-
thesised and characterised. Palladium complexes of these
dendrimers have been used as catalysts in the allylic alkylation
reaction. It has been shown that these dendrimeric catalysts can
be used in a continuous process using a membrane reactor.
Current work is aiming at the enhancement of the stability of
these catalysts, and the exploration of these systems in other
reactions.
1 E. Buhleier, W. Wehner and F. Vögtle, Synth. Commun., 1978, 155.
2 Reviews on dendrimers: (a) H.-B. Mekelburger, W. Jaworek and F.
Vögtle, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1992, 31, 1571; (b) D. A. Tomalia
and H. D. Durst, Top. Curr. Chem., 1993, 165, 193; (c) J. Issberner, R.
Moors and F. Vögtle, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1994, 33, 2413; (d)
D. Gudat, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1997, 36, 1951; (e) H. Frey, C.
Lach and K. Lorenz, Adv. Mater., 1998, 10, 279; (f) R. J. Puddephatt,
Chem. Commun., 1998, 1055; (g) J.-P. Majoral and A.-M. Caminade,
Chem. Rev., 1999, 99, 845; (h) D. K. Smith and F. Diederich, Chem. Eur.
J., 1998, 4, 1353; (i) M. Fischer and F. Vögtle, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
1999, 38, 884.
3 (a) J. W. J. Knapen, A. W. van der Made, J. C. de Wilde, P. W. N. M. van
Leeuwen, P. Wijkens, D. M. Grove and G. van Koten, Nature, 1994, 372,
659; (b) P. Bhyrappa, J. K. Young, J. S. Moore and K. S. Suslick, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 1996, 118, 5708; (c) K. Matyjaszewski, T. Shigemoto,
J. M. J. Fréchet and M. Leduc, Macromolecules, 1996, 29, 4167; (d) D.
Seebach, R. E. Marti and T. Hintermann, Helv. Chim. Acta, 1996, 79,
1710; (e) M. T. Reetz, G. Lohmer and R. Schwickardi, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. Engl., 1997, 36, 1526; (f) I. Morao and F. P. Cossío, Tetrahedron
Lett., 1997, 38, 6461; (g) H. Brunner, J. Organomet. Chem., 1995, 500,
39.
4 (a) U. Kragl and C. Dreisbach, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1996, 35,
642; (b) N. J. Hovestad, E. B. Eggeling, H. J. Heidbüchel, J. T. B. H.
Jastrzebski, U. Kragl, W. Keim, D. Vogt and G. van Koten, Angew.
Chem., 1999, 38, 1655.
5 (a) L.-L. Zhou and J. Roovers, Macromolecules, 1993, 26, 963; (b) D.
Seyferth, D. Y. Son, A. L. Rheingold and R. L. Ostrander, Organo-
metallics, 1994, 13, 2682; (c) B. Alonso, I. Cuadrado, M. Morán and J.
Losada, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1994, 2575; (d) H. Frey, K.
Lorenz, R. Mülhaupt, U. Rapp and F. J. Mayer-Posner, Macromol. Symp.,
1996, 102, 19; (e) E. V. Getmanova, T. B. Chenskaya, O. B.
Gorbatsevich, E. A. Rebrov, N. G. Vasilenko and A. M. Muzafarov,
React. Funct. Polym., 1997, 33, 289.
This work was supported in part (A. L. S.) by the Council for
Chemical Sciences of the Netherlands Organisation for Scien-
tific Research (CW-NWO).
6 A. W. van der Made and P.W.N.M van Leeuwen, J. Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun., 1992, 1400.
7 N. E. Schore, L. S. Benner and B. E. LaBelle, Inorg. Chem., 1981, 20,
3200.
Notes and references
¯
‡ Crystal data for 3: C104H172Si17, Mr = 1899.96, triclinic, space group P1,
a = 17.2970(4), b = 19.5782(4), c = 22.2298(5) Å, a = 106.1813(15), b
Communication 9/04455H
1624
Chem. Commun., 1999, 1623–1624