162
D.L. Grisenti et al. / Inorganica Chimica Acta 363 (2010) 157–162
4
and back-intersystem crossing to the T2g (Oh) excited state. Pro-
ductive photoreaction has been ruled out by the aforementioned
extended photolysis studies and back-intersystem crossing has
typically been ruled out for cyano-am(m)ine complexes [8c,22].
Non-productive photoreaction involving Cr–N dissociation fol-
lowed by reassociation (imposed by the macrocycle) is plausible
here and has been suggested for other macrocyclic trans-
[Cr(N4)(CN)2]+ complexes [6b].
Acknowledgements
This material is based upon work supported by the National Sci-
ence Foundation under Grant CHE-709562 and by the Henry Drey-
fus Teacher Scholar Award Program.
References
[1] S.R. Cooper (Ed.), Crown Compounds: Toward Future Applications, VCH, New
York, 1992.
[2] (a) R.D. Hancock, A.E. Martell, Chem. Rev. 89 (1989) 1875;
(b) T.A. Kaden, Chimia 54 (2000) 574.
[3] F. Cuenot, M. Meyer, E. Espinosa, A. Bucaille, R. Burgat, R. Guilard, C. Marichal-
Westric, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. (2008) 267. and references therein.
[4] M. Shokeen, C. Anderson, Acc. Chem. Res. 42 (2009) 832. and references
therein.
Lifetime data for both the [16]aneN4 and isocyclam complexes
was collected over the range of 5–75 °C in 0.01 M HCl(aq). For
the [16]aneN4 complex, plots of ln(k ꢁ k°) versus Tꢁ1 (Eq. (2),
where k° was set to its 77 K value) were linear and gave a value
of 39 kJ/mol for Ea and A = 3 ꢂ 1011
.
[5] (a) R. Delgado, V. Felix, L.M.P. Lima, D.W. Price, Dalton Trans. (2007) 2734;
(b) S. Wang, T.D. Westmoreland, Inorg. Chem. 48 (2009) 719;
(c) T. Vitha, V. Kubicek, P. Hermann, L. Vander Elst, R.N. Muller, Z.I. Kolar, H.T.
Wolterbeek, W.A.P. Breeman, I. Lukes, J.A. Peters, J. Med. Chem. 51 (2008) 677.
[6] (a) P.S. Wagenknecht, C. Hu, D. Ferguson, L.C. Nathan, R.D. Hancock, J.R.
Whitehead, K. Wright-Garcia, M.T. Vagnini, Inorg. Chem. 44 (2005) 9518;
(b) M.T. Vagnini, N.A.P. Kane-Maguire, P.S. Wagenknecht, Inorg. Chem. 45
(2006) 3789.
k ¼ kꢄ þ AeꢁEa=RT
ð2Þ
Even without consideration of k°, the Arrhenius plot was nearly
linear, indicating the lifetime of the complex over this temperature
range is almost entirely determined by the thermally activated
pathway and explains why the [16]aneN4 complex shows little to
no room temperature deuterium isotope effect on its excited state
lifetime. A simple Arrhenius plot for the corresponding isocyclam
complex data, on the other hand, shows substantial curvature over
the temperature range, indicating that the temperature indepen-
dent term plays a significant role in excited state relaxation at or
near room temperature, explaining why this complex shows a sig-
nificant room temperature deuterium isotope effect on its excited
state lifetime. A three parameter fit according to Eq. (2) returned
values of Ea = 39 kJ/mol, A = 1 ꢂ 1010, and k° = 5900 sꢁ1. Thus, the
reason that the lifetime of the [16]aneN4 complex is almost com-
pletely determined by the thermally activated mechanism,
whereas the k° term is significant for the isocyclam complex lies
in the difference in the pre-exponential factor, not the activation
energies. It is noteworthy that the activation barriers for both com-
plexes are very similar to the value of 38 kJ/mol determined for
trans-[Cr(cyclam)(CN)2]+ [28]. It is also curious that the value for
k° for the [16]aneN4 complex (5900 sꢁ1, which corresponds to
[7] (a) P.S. Wagenknecht, N.A.P. Kane-Maguire, D.G. Speece, N. Helwic, Inorg.
Chem. 41 (2002) 1229;
(b) M.T. Vagnini, W.C. Rutledge, P.S. Wagenknecht, Inorg. Chem., submitted for
publication.
[8] [12]ane-N4 and [13]ane-N4 would presumably give only cis- isomers due to
their small hole sizes. The trans-[Cr(N4)(CN)2] complexes of cyclam and 15-
ane-N4 are known: (a) N.A.P. Kane-Maguire, J.A. Bennett, P.K. Miller, Inorg.
Chem. Acta 76 (1983) L123;
(b) N.A.P. Kane-Maguire, W.S. Crippen, P.K. Miller, Inorg. Chem. 22 (1983) 696;
(c) R.B. Lessard, M.J. Heeg, T. Buranda, M.W. Perkovic, C.L. Schwarz, Y. Rudong,
J.F. Endicott, Inorg. Chem. 31 (1992) 3091.
[9] (a) L. Sabatini, L. Fabbrizzi, Inorg. Chem. 18 (1979) 438;
(b) R.W. Hay, B. Kinsman, C.I. Smith, Polyhedron 14 (1995) 1245.
[10] W.L. Smith, J.D. Ekstrand, K.N. Raymond, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 100 (1978) 3539.
and references therein.
[11] G.R. Brubaker, F.H. Jarke, I.M. Brubaker, Inorg. Chem. 18 (1979) 2032.
[12] E. Itoh, K. Yamamoto, M. Funato, M. Suzuki, A. Uehara, Thermochim. Acta 195
(1992) 51.
[13] J. Eriksen, O. Mønsted, Acta Chem. Scand. A 38 (1984) 775.
[14] R.G. Swisher, G.A. Brown, R.C. Smierciak, E.L. Blinn, Inorg. Chem. 20 (1981)
3947.
[15] I. Tabushi, Y. Taniguchi, H. Kato, Tetrahedron Lett. 18 (1977) 1049.
[16] M. Kodama, H. Anan, T. Koike, E. Kimura, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 62 (1989) 4044.
[17] J. Ferguson, M.L. Tobe, Inorg. Chim. Acta 4 (1969) 109.
[18] R.G. Swisher, E.L. Blinn, Inorg. Chem. 25 (1986) 1320.
[19] Y. Hung, L.Y. Martin, S.C. Jackels, M. Tait, D.H. Busch, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 99
(1977) 4029.
s
= 170
ls), is not in good agreement with the 77 K excited state
lifetime of 217
l
s. This may simply reflect subtle differences in
the medium (the 77 K experiments were run in a DMSO/H2O glass)
or may indicate a discontinuity in the lifetime versus temperature
behavior that can occur with large changes in solvent mobility as
has been observed for other [Cr(N4)X2]+ complexes [29].
[20] V.J. Thöm, J.C.A. Boeyens, G.J. McDougall, R.D. Hancock, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 106
(1984) 3198.
[21] A.F. Fucaloro, L.S. Forster, S.G. Glover, A.D. Kirk, Inorg. Chem. 24 (1985) 4242.
[22] E. Zinato, Coord. Chem. Rev. 129 (1994) 195.
[23] L.S. Forster, Coord. Chem. Rev. 227 (2002) 59.
[24] J.F. Endicott, R.B. Lessard, Y. Lei, C.K. Ryu, R. Tamilarasan, in: A.B.P. Lever (Ed.),
Excited States and Reactive Intermediates, ACS Symposium Series, vol. 307,
American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, 1986, p. 85.
[25] K. Kühn, F. Wagestian, H. Kupka, J. Phys. Chem. 85 (1981) 665.
[26] J.F. Endicott, R.B. Lessard, D. Lynch, M.W. Perkovic, C.K. Ryu, Coord. Chem. Rev.
97 (1990) 65.
[27] A.W. Adamson, P.D. Fleischauer, in: Concepts of Inorganic Photochemistry,
Wiley and Sons, New York, 1975, p. 16.
[28] J.F. Endicott, R. Tamilarasan, R.B. Lessard, Chem. Phys. Lett. 112 (1984) 381.
[29] (a) A.M. Ghaith, L.S. Forster, J.V. Rund, J. Phys. Chem. 92 (1988) 6197;
(b) M.T. Vagnini, W.C. Rutledge, C. Hu, D.G. VanDerveer, P.S. Wagenknecht,
Inorg. Chim. Acta 360 (2007) 1482.
4. Conclusions
Tetraazamacrocyclic ligands have continued to find applications
involving their metal ion binding constants and selectivity. We
have provided preparative details for new syntheses of two of
the less-utilized ligands in this group that should make these li-
gands more accessible. Chiefly, we have expanded the set of
well-characterized trans-[Cr(cyclam)(CN)2]+ complexes available
for our energy transfer studies.