InVestigation of the Gas-Phase Ozonolysis of Isoprene
J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 119, No. 31, 1997 7335
detected in the gas-phase ozonolysis of ET21 and ample evidence
for the generation of dioxiranes during the ozonolysis has been
collected.17 Hence, it is the general opinion that path I
represents the preferred rearrangement route of carbonyl oxides.
Table 3. Stoichiometric Ratio r ) ∆[alkene]/∆[O3], CO2 Yields,
and OH Yields (with Respect to Reacted O3) in the Ozonolysis of
Propene (PR), cis-Butene (CB), trans-Butene (TB),
2,3-Dimethyl-2-butene (TME), and Isoprene (ISP) in the Presence
a
of 20 vol % O2
Path II is characterized by the migration of a syn positioned
H atom to the terminal O atom via TSII thus forming a
hydroperoxide, which can decompose via TSIII to OH and
formyl radicals. In the literature, there was early speculation
that path II might represent an alternative rearrangement and
decomposition route of carbonyl oxides in the gas phase.22 In
our recent ab initio investigation13 we could clarify that for the
parent carbonyl oxide 1, path II represents a high energy reaction
with an activation enthalpy of 31 kcal/mol (CCSD(T)/6-31G-
(d,p) calculations). The intermediate hydroperoxide 5, which
as a carbene would be rather unstable, does not exist on the
CCSD(T) potential energy surface. Instead, H migration leads
directly to decomposition of 1 into the formyl and OH radicals
7 (Scheme 2).
alkene
PR
p0(CO)
r
CO2 yield, %
OH yield, %
0
20
0
20
0
20
0
30
0
1.2
1.0
1.3
1.0
1.6
1.0
2.2
1.0
1.2
1.0
42
60
40
57
50
74
40
76
22
41
18 ( 4
17 ( 2
24 ( 2
36 ( 2
19 ( 4
CB
TB
TME
ISP
20
a The statistical error in the determination of r was (0.01. The error
in integrated CO2 yields was estimated to be (2%.
in stoichiometric ratio -∆r is within experimental uncertainty
and in no case smaller than the increase in CO2 production.
For PR and ISP, -∆r ≈ ∆[CO2], for CB, TB, and TME;
however, -∆r > ∆[CO2]. On the basis of the experimental
findings reported in this work, no information can be deduced
as to the additional alkene consumption (see also discussion in
section 4). It is expected that statistical calculations describing
the chemically activated systems employing the master equation
approach will provide answers to this question. Preliminary
results19 indicate that OH yields of 100% reported by Atkinson
and Aschmann12 cannot be corroborated by statistical model
calculations.
The OH yields given here are in good agreement with values
for PR (17%), CB (14%), and TB (24%) reported by Horie and
co-workers,9 where it has to be stressed that the OH yield
reported in ref 9 was based on a detailed product analysis by
FTIR spectroscopy. On the other hand, the OH yields sum-
marized in Table 3 are consistently lower than the values
reported by Atkinson and Aschmann (PR, 33; CB, 41; TB, 64;
TME, 100; ISP, 27%),12 Niki and co-workers (TME, 70; ISP,
68 ( 15%),7 and Paulson and co-workers,11 which has to be
considered when discussing the mechanism of OH formation
(see Section 4).
In case of a syn-alkyl-substituted carbonyl oxide with an R-H
atom such as in 8, an intermediate hydroperoxyalkene (see 12)
rather than an unstable hydroperoxy carbene is formed, which
in an endothermic process without energy barrier decomposes
to OH and alkyl radicals such as 14. In the case of dimethyl
carbonyl oxide 15, the activation enthalpy of path II is lower
than that of path I and, therefore, path II should represent the
preferred decomposition route.13
The question is, which of the carbonyl oxides of Scheme 1
prefer to follow path I or path II. To answer this question, we
characterize each carbonyl oxide according to the nature of the
migrating H atom and the number of atoms participating in the
cyclic transition state (TS) of the H migration. As pointed out
above, the syn-positioned H atom (encircled in Scheme 1) in
the parent carbonyl oxide 1 does not migrate easily because (a)
the intermediately formed hydroperoxy carbene is unstable and
(b) the TS involves a four-atom cycle of considerable strain
(C4-type H atom, carbonyl oxide H, 4-membered TS). In the
case of carbonyl oxide 8, there is a syn-methyl H atom that can
migrate via a five-membered cyclic TS of considerably less
strain to the closed-shell system 12 (A5-type H atom: alkyl H
atom, 5-membered TS; Scheme 2). The ozonolysis of PR, CB,
and TB will involve syn- and anti-carbonyl oxides possessing
either C4- or A5-type H atoms (Scheme 1), while the ozonolysis
of TME exclusively leads to carbonyl oxide 15 with a A5-type
H atom (Schemes 1 and 2).
While experimental results indicate a significant amount of
OH radical production during ozonolysis, it was felt that
independent confirmation for the formation of OH radicals in
the reaction systems investigated needed to be obtained. Also
a detailed computational assessment of previously implied
pathways leading to OH formation in the ozonolysis of alkenes
deemed to be in order. For this purpose, we carried out quantum
chemical calculations, which are discussed in the next section.
In the ozonolysis of ISP, the carbonyl oxides 1, 22, 29, 36,
43, 50, 54, 59, and 63 can be formed (Scheme 1). Of these, 1,
22, and 29 possess C4-type H atoms and, therefore, should not
decompose easily to yield OH radicals. However, carbonyl
oxides 36 and 43 have A5 H atoms, which should make them
prone to follow path II. Migration of a methyl H in 54 will
lead to a 6-membered TS and, accordingly, the H atom can be
denoted as A6. It has to be checked whether 54 can also lead
to an intermediate hydroperoxy alkene and, thereby, to a
preference of OH production rather than dioxirane formation.
Carbonyl oxides 50, 59, and 63 possess a vinyl H atom that
might migrate to the terminal O atom via a 5- (V5-) or
6-membered TS (V6-type H atom, Scheme 1) and it has to be
clarified whether V5 or V6 H atoms can as easy migrate as A5
H atoms.
3. Quantum Chemical Investigation
Our previous investigation13 suggests that only those carbonyl
oxides, which possess in syn position a CHR2 or CH2R group,
lead to formation of OH radicals because interactions of an H
atom of CHR2 (CH2R) with the terminal O atom of carbonyl
oxide previously described by Cremer14 in 1979 facilitate the
rearrangement to a hydroperoxy compound which decomposes
to yield OH radicals. In Scheme 1, all possible carbonyl oxides
that can be generated upon decomposition of ET, PR, TB, CB,
TME, and ISP primary ozonide are shown. For each of the
carbonyl oxides of Scheme 1, there are two possible unimo-
lecular rearrangement and decomposition paths I and II, which
are shown in Schemes 2 and 3 (molecules and TSs 1-66). Path
I corresponds to the isomerization reaction of carbonyl oxide
to dioxirane via TSI (Scheme 2).3,17,20,21 Dioxirane (3) has been
(20) Cremer, D.; Gauss, J.; Kraka, E.; Stanton, J. F.; Bartlett, R. J. Chem.
Phys. Lett. 1993, 209, 547.
(21) (a) Lovas, F. J.; Suenram, R. D. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1977, 51, 453.
(b) Suenram, R. D.; Lovas, F. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1978, 100, 5117.
(22) Kafafi, S. A.; Martinez, R. I.; Herron, J. T. In Molecular structure
and energetics. UnconVentional chemical bonding; Liebman, J. F. Green-
berg, A., Eds.; VCH Publishers: New York, 1988; Vol. 6, p 283 and
references given therein.
(19) Olzmann, M.; Kraka, E.; Cremer, D.; Gutbrod, R. J. Phys. Chem.,
in press.