Fig. 2 Recovery experiments of Rh3+-loaded ion exchangers 1 (top left), 2 (top right), 3 (bottom left) and 4 (bottom right).§ Black bars indicate the loaded
ion exchangers after adsorption of Rh3+ in H2O, 1 M HCl or absolute EtOH for 48 h. White bars indicate the amount of Rh3+ left on the ion exchanger after
desorption in 2 M HNO3 for 48 h. Reagents and conditions: adsorption: RhCl3·3H2O (an amount, corresponding to a ligand to metal ratio of 1+1) in 50 ml
of solvent (H2O, 1 M HCl or absolute EtOH), 200 mg ion exchanger, agitation for 2 days. Desorption: 100 mg loaded ion exchanger, 50 ml 2 M HNO3,
agitation for 2 days.
in 1 M HCl (maximum 25%). The difference can be explained
by a different extraction mechanism under the adsorption
conditions, as discussed above. The large amounts of chloride
ions strongly compete with the metal ions for the positively
charged binding sites. The possible coordination of more than
one ligand to a single Rh metal-ion might be an explanation for
the inability of any of the ion exchangers to attain a 100% ligand
occupancy.
stimulating discussions. Mr J. J. M. van Brussel is thanked for
his technical assistance.
Notes and references
† A mixture of 3-chloropropyltrimethoxysilane (83 mmol) and 1,3-diami-
nopropane (250 mmol) was heated under argon at 150 °C for 6 h. After
cooling, the white solid phase was filtered off and the liquid phase was
purified by vacuum distillation (bp 112–114 °C/1 mm Hg). Yield 5.18 g
(22%).1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): d 0.61 (t, 2H, SiCH2) 1.00 (br s, 2H,
NH2), 1.21 (t, 9H, OCH2CH3), 1.55–1.65 (m, 4H, SiCH2CH2,
NHCH2CH2CH2NH2), 2.59–2.64 (2 3 t, 4H, CH2NHCH2), 2.74 (t, 2H,
CH2NH2), 3.80 (q, 6H, OCH2CH3). Subsequent immobilisation was
performed similarly to ion exchangers 1–3.12
‡ As RhCl3 shows extensive aquation (the formation of kinetically rather
inert aquochloro complexes) with time, freshly prepared RhCl3-solutions
( < 10 min old) were always used. Furthermore, hardly any variation in the
pH has been observed.
The desorption possibility (Fig. 2, right bars), after Rh
adsorption in water, increased in the following way: 3 í 2 í
4 = 1
The stripping percentages range from 45% when the
diethylenetriamine ion exchanger 3 is used to > 90% for the
monoamine ion exchanger 1. Evidently, the formation of five-
membered chelate rings has a strongly negative effect on the
desorption. This effect already becomes clear with ethylenedi-
amine but is more strongly displayed when multiple chelate
rings are formed. Apparently, the six-membered chelate rings,
that ion exchanger 4 forms with the metal ions, are stable
enough for good adsorption (64%), but not too stable, to prevent
easy desorption.
§ The determinations of the uptake capacities and desorption, are based
upon the metal content on the ion exchangers, established by concentrated
acid digestion as previously described.3
1 B. Cornils and W. A. Herrmann, Applied Homogeneous Catalysis with
Organometallic Compounds, ed. B. Cornils and W. A. Herrmann, VCH
Publishers, NY, 1996, vol. 29.
2 H. J. Hoorn, P. deJoode, D. J. Dijkstra, W. L. Driessen, H. Kooijman, N.
Veldman, A. L. Spek and J. Reedijk, J. Mater. Chem., 1997, 7, 1747.
3 J. Kramer, A. Scholten, W. L. Driessen and J. Reedijk, Inorg. Chim.
Acta, 2001, 315, 183.
These desorption differences are absent when the adsorption
was performed in 1 M HCl, demonstrating the absence of
binding in a chelate fashion under these conditions. Although
the adsorptions were much lower, a good desorption was
obtained with all the ion exchangers ( > 80%).
The desorption, after adsorption in ethanol, proved to be very
difficult for all the ion exchangers used. This has most probably
to do with partial reduction of the Rh metal ions in this solvent,
as reported by Hernan et al.15 and Kriek et al.16
4 G. P. Demopoulos, Hydrometallurgy, 1989, 82, 165.
5 I. A. Kovalev, L. V. Bogacheva, G. I. Tsysin, A. A. Formanovsky and
Y. A. Zolotov, Talanta, 2000, 52, 39.
6 E. Benguerel, G. P. Demopoulos and G. B. Harris, Hydrometallurgy,
1996, 40, 135.
7 M. S. Alam, K. Inoue and K. Yoshizuka, Hydrometallurgy, 1998, 49,
213.
8 H. J. Borg, L. C. A. Vandenoetelaar and J. W. Niemantsverdriet, Catal.
In conclusion, it is shown that very efficient recovery of Rh3+
has been achieved with amine-containing ion exchangers that
form complexes with log D values lying roughly between 2.0
and 2.5. Both the ligand capacity and the elution percentage of
the metal ion have proven to be very dependent on the
adsorption conditions.
Lett., 1993, 17, 81.
9 J. Blum, Russ. Chem. Bull., 1993, 42, 1619.
10 M. Lin and A. Sen, Nature, 1994, 368, 613.
11 M. M. Mdleleni, R. G. Rinker and P. C. Ford, Inorg. Chim. Acta, 1998,
270, 345.
The work is currently being extended to the possible
application in a continuous system. This implies that important
factors such as adsorption and desorption kinetics, successive
recovery and the use of other Rh-containing catalysts will be
investigated.
Financial support comes from the IOP (Innovation Oriented
Research Programme, The Netherlands) Environmental Tech-
nology/Heavy Metals cluster Separation, project number
IZW97411. Dr W. Buijs (DSM-Research) is acknowledged for
12 J. Kramer, W. L. Driessen, K. R. Koch and J. Reedijk, Hydrometallurgy,
to be submitted.
13 P. Comba, Coord. Chem. Rev., 1999, 185–186, 81.
14 B. K. Tait and D. P. Shillington, S. Afr. J. Chem., 1992, 45, 17.
15 P. Hernan, C. del Pino and E. Ruiz-Hitzky, Chem. Mater., 1992, 4,
49.
16 R. J. Kriek, W. J. Engelbrecht and J. J. Cruywagen, J. S. Afr. Inst. Min.
Metall., 1995, 75.
Chem. Commun., 2001, 2420–2421
2421