Chemistry Letters 2002
289
(4-CF3C6H4Þ(CH3)2TeþIÀ and (4-CF3C6H4)(CH3)Te in low
yields. These results clearly indicate that the unique valence
expansion took place by electron transfer from KC8 and was
applicable for the synthesis of new hexavalent tellurium
compounds with mixed carbon ligands. In fact, Ph6-n(CH3)nTe
(n ¼ 1, 4;8 n ¼ 2, trans-59) and (4-CH3C6H4)6-n(CH3)nTe
(n ¼ 1, 6;10 n ¼ 2, trans-7) were obtained from Ph3TeþBrÀ
and (4-CH3C6H4)3TeþClÀ as shown in Table 1.
Dedicated to Prof. Teruaki Mukaiyama on the occasion of his
75th birthday.
References and Notes
1
R. S. Michalak, S. R. Wilson, and J. C. Martin, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 106,
7529 (1984); K. Alam and A. F. Janzen, J. Fluorine Chem., 27, 467
(1985); L. Ahmed and J. A. Morrison, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 112, 7411
(1990); S. Sato, T. Yamashita, E. Horn, and N. Furukawa, Organome-
tallics, 15, 3526 (1996); M. Minoura, T. Sagami, K.-y. Akiba, C.
Modrakowski, A. Sudau, K. Seppelt, and S. Wallenhauer, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 35, 2660 (1996); S. Sato, T. Yamashita, E. Horn,
O. Takahashi, and N. Furukawa, Tetrahedron, 53, 12183 (1997).
G. A. Olah, K. K. Laali, Q. Wang, and G. K. S. Prakash, in ‘‘Onium
Ions,’’ John Wiley & Sons, New York (1998), p 167; D. Hellwinkel,
Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 192, 158 (1972).
Instead of KC8, C H K11 or PhCH2K12 could be used for the
3
reaction (Table 1), and trans-2 was obtained from (4-
CF3C6H4)2Te even by the use of PhCH2K. Therefore, PhCH2K
and CH3K should behave as an electron donor similar to KC8.
In order to elucidate the mechanism of the reaction, we
examined the effects of the equivalents of the reagents of KC8 and
CH3I in the reaction with (4-CF3C6H4)2Te on the yield of
hexavalent tellurium compounds. These results are shown in
Table 2. The generation of (4-CF3C6H4)TeÀ was suggested by
the formation of (4-CF3C6H4)(CH3)Te in the initial stage of the
reaction (entry 2 in Table 2). By use of a large excess of KC8 the
number of the Te-Ar bond clevaged increased. The 125Te NMR of
the reaction mixture from (4-CF3C6H4)2Te and a large excess of
KC8 at À78 ꢀC before the addition of CH3I showed a signal at ꢀ
360 ppm, which can be assigned as that for a dianion (4-
CF3C6H4)4Te2ÀÁ2(KþC8), generated independently by the reac-
tion of (4-CF3C6H4)5(CH3)Te with KC8.5 The signal at ꢀ
362 ppm was also observed in the reaction of (4-CF3C6H4)2Te
with CH3K before the addition of CH3I, therefore, it is confirmed
that CH3K acts as an electron donor. The detailed reaction
mechanism is not clear yet but a possible mechanism is illustrated
in Scheme 2.
2
3
For example, see: A. Furstner, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 32, 164
¨
¨
(1993); R. Csuk, B. I. Glanzer, and A. Furstner, Adv. Organomet. Chem.,
28, 85 (1988); D. Savoia, C. Trombini, and A. Umani-Ronchi, Pure
Appl. Chem., 57, 1887 (1985); H. Selig and L. B. Ebert, Adv. Inorg.
Chem. Radiochem., 23, 281 (1980); J.-M. Lalancette, G. Rollin, and P.
Dumas, Can. J. Chem., 50, 3058 (1972).
4
General procedure;
A
THF solution of Ar2-n(CH3)nTe or
Ar3-m(CH3)mTeþXÀ (Ar: 4-CF3C6H4, Ph, 4-CH3C6H4) {aryl halide
was also added in some cases (see Table 1)g was added to freshly
prepared KC8 (ca. 15 equiv) at À78 ꢀC. After 5 min of stirring, CH3I (ca.
30 equiv) was added at the same temperature, and the reaction mixture
was allowed to warm to room temperature. Graphite powder was filtered
off, and volatile materials were evaporated. Hexavalent oraganotellur-
ium species could be isolated by recycling HPLC(Japan Analytical
Industry LC-908, 1,2-dichloroethane as an eluent). The yields are
summarized in Table 1.
5
6
M. Miyasato, M. Minoura, and K.-y. Akiba, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 40,
2674 (2001).
trans-3; mp. 224 ꢀC (dec.); 1H NMR(400 MHz, CDCl3, 25 ꢀC) ꢀ1.88(s,
12H), 7.64 (d, 4H, J ¼ 8:3 Hz), 7.85 (d, 4H, J ¼ 8:3 Hz); 13CNMR
1
(100 MHz, CDCl3, 25 ꢀC) ꢀ 36.3 (q, JCTe ¼ 7:1 Hz), 124.2 (q,
2
1JCF ¼ 272 Hz), 124.9 (d), 129.6 (q, JCF ¼ 33 Hz), 130.5 (d), 165.9
Table 2. Effects of the equivalents of the reagents (KC8 and CH3I) in the
reaction with (4-CF3C6H4)2Te
(s, 1JCTe ¼ 173 Hz);19F NMR(376 MHz, CDCl3, 25 ꢀC) ꢀÀ63:0; 125Te
NMR [126 MHz, CDCl3, 25 ꢀC, (C H )2Te] ꢀ 119.
Data were collected at 200 K on a Mac Science DIP2030 imaging plate
3
7
equipped with graphite-monochromated Mo-Kꢁ radiation (ꢂ ¼
ꢀ
0:71073 A). Unit cell parameters were determined by autoindexing
several images in each data set separately with program DENZO. For
each data set, rotation images were collected in 3 ꢀ increments with a
total rotation of 180 ꢀ about ꢃ. Data were processed by using
SCALEPACK. The structure was solved using the teXsan system and
refined by full-matrix least-squares. Crystal data for trans-3: monoclinic
ꢀ
system, space group C2=c (no. 15), a ¼ 12:1390ð8Þ A, b ¼
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ 3
18:359ð1Þ A, c ¼ 9:4980ð5Þ A, ꢄ ¼ 118:067ð4Þ , V ¼ 1867:8ð2Þ A ,
Z ¼ 4, ꢅcalc ¼ 1:70 g cmÀ3. R ¼ 0:0654 (Rw ¼ 0:1305) for 1925
observed reflections (116 parameters) with I > 3ꢆðIÞ. Goodness of
fit ¼ 1:311
8
9
M. Minoura, T. Mukuda, T. Sagami, and K.-y. Akiba, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
121, 10852 (1999).
trans-5; mp. 246 ꢀC (dec.); 1H NMR(400 MHz, CDCl3, 25 ꢀC) ꢀ2.14(s,
6H), 7.20 (t, 8H, J ¼ 6:8 Hz), 7.28 (t, 4H, J ¼ 6:8 Hz), 7.32 (d, 8H,
J ¼ 6:8 Hz); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, 25 ꢀC) ꢀ 29.5 (q,
1JCTe ¼ 16:6 Hz), 127.1 (d), 127.5 (d), 132.6 (d), 157.5 (s,
1JCTe ¼ 74:6 Hz); 125Te NMR [126 MHz, CDCl3, 25 ꢀC, (C H)2Te] ꢀ
3
274.
10 6; mp. 226 ꢀC (dec.); 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3, 25 ꢀC) ꢀ 2.16 (s, 3H),
2.24 (s, 3H), 2.31 (s, 12H), 6.95 (d, 2H, J ¼ 7:8 Hz), 6.97 (d, 8H,
J ¼ 7:8 Hz), 7.27 (d, 8H, J ¼ 7:8 Hz), 7.50 (d, 2H, J ¼ 7:8 Hz); 13C
NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3, 25 ꢀC) ꢀ 21.0 (q), 21.1 (q), 33.0 (q,
1JCTe ¼ 12:4 Hz), 127.7 (d), 127.9 (d), 133.1 (d), 133.7 (d), 137.0 (s),
137.1 (s), 148.5 (s, 1JCTe ¼ 16:6 Hz), 151.9 (s, 1JCTe ¼ 49:8 Hz); 125Te
Scheme 2. Possible mechanism.
NMR [126 MHz, CDCl3, 25 ꢀC, (C H )2Te] ꢀ 341.
This work was supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific
Research (No. 11304044 and 12740352) from the Ministry of
Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of the
Japanese Government. The support of the Nishida Research Fund
for Fundamental Organic Chemistry (to M. Minoura) is also
acknowledged.
3
11 C. Eaborn, P. B. Hitchcock, K. Izod, A. J. Jaggar, and J. D. Smith,
Organometallics, 13, 753 (1994); E. Weiss and G. Sauermann, Chem.
Ber., 103, 265 (1970); E. Weiss and G. Sauermann, Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. Engl., 7, 133 (1968).
12 M. Schlosser, Pure Appl. Chem., 60, 1627 (1988); M. Schlosser and J.
Hartmann, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 12, 508 (1973).