Sandile Ncanana et al.
FULL PAPERS
B) In other monophasic reaction media and under iopti-
mized conditions (see Table 1): Totarol (1, 100 mg) dissolved
in 16 mL water-miscible organic solvent (methanol, acetoni-
trile or acetone) was added to 16 mL acetate buffer 20 mM
pH 4.5 in which the laccase from Trametes pubescens
contained 1 mg totarol, 10 mg (6 U) Trametes pubescens lac-
case, 1 mL methanol and 1 mL 20 mM sodium acetate
pH 4.5. The reactions were incubated at 20, 30, 40, and
508C , with all other conditions remaining the same.
(
100 mg, 60 U) had been previouslydissolved. The solution
was incubated at 308C under mild shaking, following the
conversion byTLC and HPLC. After 24 h the solution was
extracted with AcOEt (which dissolved also most of the
solid precipitate) and the solvent was evaporated. The crude
material (~100 mg) obtained using acetone as cosolvent was
purified byflash chromatography(eluent: petroleum ether-
AcOEt, 100:0.5) to give the products 1a (62 mg) and 1b
Product Characterization
NMR spectra were recorded with
a Bruker AC400
(
400 MHz). High resolution electrospraymass spectra (HR-
ESI-MS) were acquired with an FT-ICR (Fourier Transfer
Ion Cyclotron Resonance) APEX II model (Bruker Dal-
tonics) equipped with a 4.7 Tesla cryo-magnet (Magnex).
Samples were dissolved in CH CN and injected into the in-
strument equipped with its own ESI source. Spectra were re-
corded in the HR mode with resolutions ranging from 20000
to 30000.
TM
(
2 mg) with a yield of 64% and 2%, respectively.
3
C) In biphasic system: The reaction mixture contained
10 mg totarol, 40 U Trametes pubescens laccase, 0.5 mL
AcOEt or CHCl or methyl tert-butyl ether or t-AmOH or
3
toluene and 0.5 mL acetate buffer 20 mM pH 4.5. The reac-
tions were incubated at 308C with shaking at 200 rpm, the
progress of the reactions being monitored byTLC and
HPLC. After 5 days the degrees of conversion (evaluated by
Totarol (1): TLC, Rf (eluent: petroleum ether-AcOEt
1
1
00:0.5): 0.09; HPLC, R : 6.72 min; H NMR (400 MHz,
t
CDCl ): d=7.03 (1H, d, J=8.5 Hz, H-11), 6.54 (1H, d, J=
3
8
.5 Hz, H-12), 3.31 (1H, sept, J=7.0 Hz, H-15), 2.96 (1H,
HPLC) were 7, 7, 0, 56 or 8% in AcOEt, CHCl , methyl
3
dd, J =17.1 Hz, J =6.3 Hz, H-7 ), 2.78 (1H, ddd, J =
1
2
eq
1
tert-butyl ether, t-AmOH or toluene, respectively. The reac-
tion with t-AmOH was scaled-up. Totarol (100 mg) was dis-
solved in 8 mL t-AmOH and added to 16 mL acetate buffer
1
1
7.1 Hz, J =11.5 Hz, J =7.8 Hz, H-7 ), 2.25 (1H, dt, J =
2 3 ax 1
2.7 Hz, J =3.7 Hz, H-1 ) and 1.36 (1H, td, J =12.8 Hz,
2
eq
1
J =3.8 Hz, H-1 ), 1.94 (1H, ddt, J =13.3 Hz, J =7.8 Hz,
2
ax
1
2
2
(
2
0 mM pH 4.5 with the laccase from Trametes pubescens
400 U). The reaction was incubated at 308C byshaking at
20 rpm for 4 days. Following phase separation and extrac-
J =1.8 Hz, H-6 ) and 1.67 (1H, m, H-6 ), 1.75 (1H, qt,
3
eq
ax
J =13.7 Hz, J =3.4 Hz, H-2 ) and 1.61 (1H,d quint, J =
1
2
ax
1
1
3
4
1
3.8 Hz, J =3.7 Hz, H-2 ), 1.49 (1H, ddt, J =13.2 Hz, J =
2 eq 1 2
tion of the water phase with CHCl , the organic phases were
3
.7 Hz, J =1.4 Hz, H-3 ) and 1.22 (1H, td, J =13.4 Hz, J =
3
eq
1
2
mixed, and the solvent was evaporated. The crude material
was purified byflash chromatography(eluent: petroleum
ether-AcOEt, 25:1) to give a mixture of 1a and 1b (34 mg;
.1 Hz, H-3 ), 1.29 (1H, dd, J =12.7 Hz, J =2.2 Hz, H-5),
ax
1
2
.38 and 1.36 (3 H each, d each, J=7.1 Hz, CH -16 and
3
CH -17), 1.20 (3H, s, CH -20), 0.97 (3H, s, CH -18) 0.94
3
3
3
34% overall yield) and two additional new minor by-prod-
1
3
(
3H, s, CH -19); C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl ): d=152.6 (C-
3
3
ucts (a yellow one, ~1 mg, R 0.34 in TLC with the eluent:
f
1
1
3
2
3), 144.0 (C-9), 134.7 (C-8), 131.7 (C-14), 123.7 (C-11),
15.0 (C-12), 50.3 (C-5), 42.3 (C-3), 40.4 (C-1), 38.4 (C-10),
3.9 (C-18), 29.4 (C-7), 27.8 (C-15), 25.8 (C-20), 22.3 (C-19),
1.1 (C-16 and C-17), 20.2 (C-2), 20.1 (C-6) [for COSY and
petroleum ether-AcOEt, 19:1; an orange one, ~1.5 mg, Rf
0,45 in TLC), whose attempted structural characterization
resulted unsuccessful.
HSQC spectra see Supporting Information].
Effect of Buffer Salts Concentration on the
Bioconversion of Totarol
Totarol main product 1a (symmetrical CÀC dimer): TLC,
R (eluent: petroleum ether-AcOEt, 100:0.5): 0.15; HPLC,
f
1
R : 22.34 min; H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl ): d=7.03 (2H, s,
The buffer concentrations were varied from 20 to 100 mM.
The reaction mixture contained 1 mg totarol, 10 mg (6 U)
Trametes pubescens laccase, 1 mL methanol and 1 mL
sodium acetate buffer with concentration of 20, 50 or
t
3
H-11 and H-11’), 3.35 (2H, m, H-15 and H-15’), 3.02 (2H,
dd, J =17.2 Hz, J =6.4 Hz, H-7 and H-7’ ), 2.82 (2H, m,
1
2
eq
eq
H-7ax and H-7’ ), 2.25 (2H, br d, J=12.6 Hz, H-1 and H-
ax
eq
1
6
’ ), 1.97 (2H, br dd, J =13.2 Hz, J =7.9 Hz, H-6 and H-
100 mM at pH 5. The reactions were incubated at 308C with
eq 1 2 eq
’ ), 1.72 (4H, m, H-6 , H-6’ , H-2 , H-2’ ), 1.60 (2H, br d
shaking at 200 rpm. The progress of the reaction was moni-
tored byHPLC.
eq
ax
ax
ax
ax
quint, J =13.9 Hz, J =3.4 Hz, H-2 and H-2’ ), 1.49 (2H,
1
2
eq
eq
br d, J=13.1 Hz, H-3eq and H-3’ ), 1.40–1.20 (6 H , m, H-
eq
1ax, H-1’ , H-3 , H-3’ , H-5, H-5’), 1.40 and 1.38 (6 H each,
ax
ax
ax
Effect pH on the Bioconversion of Totarol
d each, J=7.1 Hz, CH -16 and CH -16’, CH -17 and CH -
3
3
3
3
The pH of the reaction medium was varied from 4 to 7
using 20 mM sodium acetate buffer. The reaction mixture
contained 1 mg totarol, 10 mg (6 U) Trametes pubescens lac-
case, 1 mL methanol and 1 mL 20 mM sodium acetate
buffer.
17’), 1.22 (6H, s, CH
and CH
(100 MHz, CDCl
and C-9’), 135.3 (C-8 and C-8’), 132.7 (C-14 and C-14’),
125.1 (C-11 and C-11’), 121.5 (C-12 and C-12’), 50.3 (C-5
and C-5’), 42.3 (C-3 and C-3’), 40.3 (C-1 and C-1’), 38.5 (C-
3
-20 and CH
3
-20’), 0.99 (6H, s, CH
3
-18
1
3
-18’), 0.95 (6H, s, CH
-19 and CH -19’); C NMR
3 3
3
): d=150.4 (C-13 and C-13’), 144.0 (C-9
3
10 and C-10’), 34,0 (C-4 and C-4’), 33.9 (C-18 and C-18’),
29.5 (C-7 and C-7’), 28.4 (C-15 and C-15’), 26.0 (C-20 and C-
20’), 22.3 (C-19 and C-19’), 20.9 (C-16 and C-16’, C-17 and
Effect of Reaction Temperature on the Bioconversion
of Totarol
In order to determine the impact of temperature on totarol
conversion bya particular dose of enz ym e, reactions were
conducted at various temperatures. The reaction mixture
C-17’), 20.2 (C-2 and C-2’), 20.1 (C-6 and C-6’) [for COSY
and HSQC spectra see Supporting Information]; ESI-MS,
+
positive mode: m/z=593.43389 [M+Na] , calcd.: 593.43290.
1512
ꢀ 2007 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Adv. Synth. Catal. 2007, 349, 1507 – 1513