Organic Process Research & Development 2000, 4, 611−612
A Facile, One-Pot Procedure for the Preparation of 2-Phenyl-1,3-propanediol
Monocarbamate, a Metabolite of Felbamate
Thomas A. Miller,† Christine M. Dieckhaus, and Timothy L. Macdonald*
Columbia UniVersity, Department of Chemistry, 3000 Broadway, MC 3144, New York, New York 10027 and
Department of Chemistry, UniVersity of Virginia, McCormick Road, CharlottesVille, Virginia 22901
Abstract:
A simple, one-pot procedure for the preparation of 2-phenyl-
1,3-propanediol monocarbamate (MCF) has been developed.
This procedure represents the most efficient method for
preparing MCF published to date, and it is amenable to the
large-scale laboratory production of this biologically relevant
metabolite of felbamate.
Figure 1.
The anti-epileptic agent felbamate (Figure 1) has been
associated with the development of idiosyncratic adverse
drug reactions. The search for felbamate-replacement thera-
pies has led to the evaluation of agents structurally related
to felbamate, including the evaluation of metabolites of
felbamate.1 2-Phenyl-1,3-propanediol monocarbamate (Figure
1, MCF), a major metabolite of felbamate, has been shown
to possess activity similar to that of felbamate.2 Our work
Figure 2.
with MCF and MCF-derived agents required that this
Overall poor efficiency in the production of MCF by this
material be made available in significant quantities, with a
method led us to consider other approaches. An efficient
potential future need for this agent in kilogram quantities.
method for producing MCF was realized by the extension
Despite its relatively simple structure, no efficient syn-
of an approach characterized by the work of McDougal and
thesis of racemic MCF has been reported in the literature.
co-workers.5 By our method, which is summarized in Figure
Several methods have been developed; however, these
3, treatment of 2-phenyl-1,3-propanediol in THF successively
methods are characterized by a lack of efficiency, and as a
with NaH (1 equiv), after 2 h, a trialkylsilyl-chloride such
as TBDMS-Cl or TMS-Cl (1.1 equiv), then 1,1′-carbonyl-
diimidazole (1.5 to 2 equiv), and finally NH3 (l) followed
result, these existing protocols are not particularly amenable
to large-scale production.3 We sought to develop an efficient
and scaleable synthesis of MCF that would permit the
by silica gel chromatography affords the corresponding silyl-
laboratory-scale production of material to support our in vivo
protected MCF in g90% isolated yield for the TBDMS
studies of its pharmacology and physicochemical properties.
derivative.6
Our efforts in this regard have centered around the
This material is further treated with 10% methanolic HCl
to afford, after silica gel chromatography, MCF in g85%
overall yield. The elimination of chromatographic purifica-
desymmeterization of symmetric precursors to racemic MCF.
Initially, the formation of MCF via the cyclic carbonate of
2-phenyl-1,3-propanediol by the method of Sarel et al. was
tions was realized by the use of TMS-Cl in the silylation
assessed (Figure 2).4 Despite numerous attempts with varied
step. This has permitted the development of a “one-pot”
conditions, this method did not afford the requisite cyclic
procedure for the preparation of MCF from 2-phenyl-1,3-
species in quantities amenable to large-scale synthesis. It has
propanediol in g85% yield with purification via crystalliza-
been noted that this method is substrate-dependent and is
tion.
favored by 1,3-diols of increased substitution.4
† Current Address: Columbia University.
(1) Yang, J. T.; Adusumalli, V. E.; Wong, K. K.; Kucharczyk, N.; Sofia, R.
Experimental Section
All reactions were carried out under argon with magnetic
stirring unless otherwise noted. All solvents were distilled
from appropriate desiccant under nitrogen immediately prior
to use in reactions unless otherwise noted. All nuclear
magnetic resonance spectra were obtained with a General
D. Drug Metab. Dispos. 1991, 19, 1126-1138. Adusumalli, V. E.; Choi,
Y. M.; Romanyshyn, L. A.; Sparadoski, R. E.; Wichman, J. K.; Wong, K.
K.; Kucharczyk, N.; Sofia, R. D. Drug Metab. Dispos. 1993, 21, 710-
716.
(2) Smith, R. D.; Grzelak, M. E.; Coffin, V. L. Pharmacol. Biochem. BehaV.
1997, 58, 657-664. Morgan, B.; Bydlinsky, B.; Dodds, D. R. Tetrahedron
Asymmetry 1995, 6, 1765-1772.
(3) Choi, Y. M.; Kucharczyk, N.; Sofia, R. D. Tetrahedron 1986, 42, 6399-
6404. Thompson, C. D.; Kinter, M. T.; Macdonald, T. L. Chem. Res.
Toxicol. 1996, 9, 1225-1229.
(4) Sarel, S.; Pohoryles, L. A.; Ben-Shoshan, R. J. Org. Chem. 1959, 24, 1873-
1876.
(5) McDougal, P. G.; Rico, J. G.; Oh, Y.-I.; Condon, B. D. J. Org. Chem.
1986, 51, 3388.
(6) For alternative methods of preparation, see: Ihara, M.; Katsumata, A.; Setsu,
F.; Tokunaga, Y.; Fukumoto, K. J. Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 677.
10.1021/op990198b CCC: $19.00 © 2000 American Chemical Society and The Royal Society of Chemistry
Published on Web 10/24/2000
Vol. 4, No. 6, 2000 / Organic Process Research & Development
•
611