Synthesis of Cucurbituril and Its Homologues
J . Org. Chem., Vol. 66, No. 24, 2001 8099
St a n d a r d R ea ct ion Con d it ion s for t h e Syn t h esis of
Cu cu r bit[n ]u r ils. The reactions have been carried out on a
scale from 10 mg up to 1 kg. An example of isolated yields can
be found in method 2 below; all others where determined by
13C NMR [see Supporting Information]. For purposes of
analysis, the Qn were recrystallized from HCl, except in the
case of Q7, which was purified on Dowex 50WX2 ion-exchange
resin, eluting with 1:1 1 M HCl/formic acid. Fractions were
evaporated and dried at 100 °C in vacuo (0.3 mmHg) for 12 h.
Cucurbit[5]uril: 1H NMR δ 4.18 (d, 2 H, J ) 15.5 Hz, CH2),
5.15 (d, 2 H, J ) 15.5 Hz, CH2), 5.34 (s, 2 H, CH); 13C NMR
51.0 (CH2), 69.9 (CH), 157.0 (CO). Anal. Calcd for C30H30N20O10‚
11H2O‚HCl: C, 32.92; H, 4.95; N, 25.60; Cl, 5.83. Found: C,
32.26; H, 4.66; N, 25.11; Cl, 5.85. Cucurbit[7]uril: 1H NMR δ
4.00 (d, 2 H, J ) 15.5 Hz, CH2), 5.18 (d, 2 H, J ) 15.5 Hz,
CH2), 5.28 (s, 2 H, CH); 13C NMR 53.5 (CH2), 72.0 (CH), 157.5
(CO). Anal. Calcd for C42H42N28O14‚8H2O‚0.5HCl: C, 38.06; H,
4.45; N, 29.59; Cl, 1.34. Found: C, 38.17; H, 4.59; N, 29.48;
Cl, 1.30. Cucurbit[8]uril: 1H NMR δ 3.97 (d, 2 H, J ) 15.5
Hz, CH2), 5.21 (d, 2 H, J ) 15.5 Hz, CH2), 5.27 (s, 2 H, CH);
13C NMR 54.5 (CH2), 72.5 (CH), 158.0 (CO). Anal. Calcd for
C48H48N32O16‚30H2O‚2.5HCl: C, 29.41; H, 5.68; N, 22.86; Cl,
4.52. Found: C, 29.87; H, 5.15; N, 23.25; Cl, 4.64. Cucurbit-
[9]uril: NMR assignments only, the compound has not been
isolated; 13C NMR 55.1 (CH2), 73.3(CH). Cucurbit[5]uril@
cucurbit[10]uril: 1H NMR δ 3.70 (d, 2 H, J ) 15.5 Hz, CH2,
Q5), 4.00 (d, 2 H, J ) 15.5 Hz, CH2, Q10), 4.91 (s, 2 H, CH,
Q5), 5.01 (d, 2 H, J ) 15.5 Hz, CH2, Q5), 5.30 (d, 2 H, J ) 15.5
Hz, CH2, Q10), 5.32 (s, 2 H, CH, Q10); 13C NMR 50.7 (CH2,
Q5), 56.4 (CH2, Q10), 69.3 (CH, Q5), 74.0 (CH, Q10), 156.5
tallization from HCl solutions, each component was isolated
in a pure form from the solid fractions Z1-3. Fractionations
were achieved in 60% aqueous formic acid, which, through
repetition, enabled the separation of Q8 and the Q5@Q10
complex from the other Qn as insoluble solids. Hot 20%
aqueous glycerol was used to separate Q7 from all of the other
components to achieve > 95% purity. Q7 was isolated from
the aqueous glycerol by the addition of MeOH and the
precipitate collected by filtration. Washing three times with
MeOH × removed the glycerol, and the solid was dried at 60
°C for 12 h to give 276 g (24%) of an off-white solid. Q6 and
Q5 accumulated in the formic acid soluble fractions and were
separated by fractional crystallization from HCl solutions, Q6,
541 g (46%), and Q5, 94 g (8%). The formic acid insoluble Q8
and the Q5@Q10 complex were also separated by fractional
crystallization from HCl solutions, Q8, 146 g (12%), and Q5@
Q10, 65 g (5%). Method 3. Dry, powdered glycoluril (1.02 g,
7.2 mmol) and paraformaldehyde (442 mg, 14.7 mmol) were
mixed together in a paste with the addition of concentrated
HCl (0.6 mL). The paste set as a solid and was then heated in
a closed reaction vessel to 100 °C for 15 h with occasional
manual mixing. The total reaction mixture was analyzed by
13C NMR and showed weight percentages of 3, 44, 33, 12, and
8% for Q5, 6, 7, 8, and 10, respectively.
Meth od for Differ en t Acid s a n d Dilu tion s. Method 1
was used in all cases except where specified. In all cases, the
reaction mixtures were homogeneous throughout the entire
process. Q5-8 were the major products, with less than 1% of
other Qn as determined by 13C NMR. Method 1, was also used
for para-toluenesulfonic acid except that the volume of acid
was substituted for a weight of acid (10 g) and the mixture
heated to 110 °C. The products were isolated by MeOH
precipitation as described. The weight percentages of Q5-8
products are reported in Supporting Information, Table S4.
Ch lor id e Bin d in g. Pure samples of Q5 were dissolved in
different concentrations of DCl/D2O and examined by NMR.
At 22% DCl/D2O, 1H NMR spectra showed the following: δ
4.13 (d, 2 H, J ) 15.5 Hz, CH2), 4.18 (d, 2 H, J ) 15.5 Hz,
CH2), 5.28 (d, 2 H, J ) 15.5 Hz, CH2), 5.30 (d, 2 H, J ) 15.5
Hz, CH2), 5.32 (s, 2 H, CH), 5.34 (s, 2 H, CH); 13C NMR δ 50.8
(CH2), 51.1 (CH2), 69.8 (CH), 69.9 (CH) 157.2 (CO) 157.9 (CO).
From 22 to 37% DCl/D2O, the upfield CH2 resonance and the
downfield CO resonance increase to become the only CH2 and
CO resonances observed; from 22 to 15%, the converse applies.
In the 1H NMR spectrum, the upfield resonances only are
found for 37% DCl/D2O; the converse applies for <15% DCl/
D2O.
(CO, Q5), 158.2 (CO, Q10). Anal. Calcd for C90H90N60O30
‚
28H2O‚3HCl: C, 34.81; H, 4.83; N, 27.06; Cl, 3.42. Found: C,
34.22; H, 4.49; N, 27.19; Cl, 3.25. ESMS m/z: 1378 ([P + 2Cs]+/
2). ESMS data for cucurbit[n]urils where n ) 5-8 can be found
in Table 1. Method 1. To glycoluril (77 mg, 0.54 mmol)
dissolved in the acid (0.4 mL) at 25-30 °C, with the aid of a
sonic bath, was added formaldehyde either as a 40% aqueous
solution (85 µL) or as solid paraformaldehyde (34 mg), and
the solution was immediately mixed. In some cases, a gel forms
after 20 min. In all cases, an exothermic reaction ensues. (On
a larger scale, the reaction mixture was cooled in an ice bath
during the addition of either form of formaldehyde). The
mixture was heated to 100 °C for 2.5-3 h, or until the reaction
was shown to be complete by NMR. Reactions on this scale
were conducted in NMR tubes and analyzed as total reaction
mixtures by 13C NMR using D2O as an external lock. Reactions
carried out on a scale 19.5 times greater than that above were
cooled and poured into MeOH (30 mL), and the precipitate
was collected by vacuum filtration. After the precipitate was
air-dried, the components were separated by fractional crystal-
lization from hydrochloric acid solutions. When HCl was the
solvent, it was either evaporated, and the residue was exam-
ined and purified as above, or the crystallization procedure
was commenced upon cooling of the reaction mixture. Method
2. Finely powdered glycoluril (1000 g, 7.04 mol) and powdered
paraformaldehyde (422 g, 14.07 mol) were added together and
the dry powders thoroughly mixed. To this was added ice-cold
concentrated HCl (1420 mL) while the mixture was stirred
rapidly. Stirring was continued until the mixture set as a gel.
After 30 min, the mixture was heated to 100 °C for 18 h. The
composition of the total reaction mixture at this point was 9,
48, 23, 14, and 6% w/w Q5, 6, 7, 8, and 10, respectively. The
mixture was cooled and filtered to collect the first crop (Z1) of
colorless crystals as a composite of 10, 40, 4, 32, and 14% w/w
Q5, 6, 7, 8, and 10, respectively, totaling 278 g. The filtrate
was then evaporated until the volume had been reduced to
one-fourth of the initial volume. To this was added water (500
mL), and the colorless crystalline suspension was collected by
filtration to give 324 g (Z2) as a composite of 5, 82, 6, and 7%
w/w Q5, 6, 7, and 8, respectively. The mother liquors contained
Q7 as the major homologue at 59%. The volume was reduced
to ∼1.2 L, poured into MeOH (3.5 L), and allowed to stand at
room temperature for 18 h. The off-white precipitate was
collected by filtration to give 654 g (Z3). Through a repetitive
process of fractionation by differential solubility and recrys-
13C-En r ich ed P a r a for m a ld eh yd e Rea ction . Method 1
was followed except for the substitution for 99% 13C-enriched
paraformaldehyde. In the methylene region of the 13C NMR
spectrum, resonances were found at 50.9, 52.4, 53.5, 54.5, 55.4,
56.8, 57.8, 58.9, and 59.9 (CH2) ppm of approximate ratios of
7, 60, 25, 7, and <1% for each of the last 5 peaks. The
remaining Q resonances were at 70.0, 71.1, 72.0, and 72.8 (CH)
ppm, ∼1% of the intensity of the methylene carbon.
Deca m eth ylcu cu r bit[5]u r il, 3. The dimethyltetracyclic
ether B (R ) Me, 5.2 g, 23.4 mmol) was placed in HCl 36%
(21 mL) and H2O (6.3 mL) and heated for 1.5 h after which all
volatiles were evaporated in vacuo and the residue was
1
examined by H and 13C NMR.15 Using an external sample of
dimethylglycoluril of known quantity, we determined the yield
of Me10Q5 to be 85%. ESMS of the residue gave m/z 618
[(Me10Q5 + 2Cs+)/2, 100] and 1103 [Me10Q5 + Cs+, 1%].
Oligom er . Powdered glycoluril (12.2 g, 85.9 mmol) and
paraformaldehyde (5.15 g, 171.8 mmol) were mixed together,
and ice-cold 36% HCl (75 mL) was added with stirring. The
solid material gradually dissolved, and the solution set as a
clear gel that was allowed to sit at room temperature for 10
min before it was heated to 50 °C in an oil bath for 19 h. The
gel produced a homogeneous solution that was poured into
methanol and the resultant precipitate collected by filtration,
washed with methanol, water, methanol, and ether, and air-
dried for several days to give 15.4 g of colorless powder that
was dried further at 80 °C in vacuo at 0.3 mmHg. Anal. Calcd
for C6H6N4O2‚4H2O: C, 30.26; H, 5.92; N, 23.52. Found: C,