196
Tatsuhiro Nozue et al.
(Vol. 70,
deviates from the data points in the high field region.
Therefore, the reduction of amplitude due to magnetic
breakdown in high field must be taken into account.
If two neighbor orbits are separated by a small gap
at a point in k-space, the electron tunnel through the
gap with a probability, P, given by exp (−H0/H) and
is reflected at the point with a probability, Q, given by
(1 − exp (−H0/H)), where the breakdown field, H0, de-
pends on the local geometry of both the orbits near the
point of tunneling or reflection.18) The oscillation am-
plitude is multiplied by the reduction factor written as
follow,
order. In Fig. 7(a), the ellipses displaced by q and 2q
are also shown. As shown in Fig. 7(b), the splits of or-
bits in the magnetic state arise at the points z1 and z2,
and there appear one closed orbit, X1, and two tubular
open orbits, X2 and X3. Since a gap energy like this
origin is generally thought to be very small, magnetic
breakdown easily takes place between these orbits. In
this case, the possible closed orbit with magnetic break-
down is an orbit B1; X1X2X1X2X1, which has four times
of tunneling at the point z1. The other is an orbit B2;
X1X2X3X2X1X2X3X2X1, which has four times of tun-
neling at both the points z1 and z2. The larger orbits
than the B2 orbit are also possible to be observed owing
to further many times of magnetic breakdown. Further-
more, the areas enclosed with the orbits, X1, B1 and
B2, are almost equal to those of the β, λ and π frequen-
cies at the [010] direction, respectively. Therefore, these
branches come from the close related Fermi surfaces due
to magnetic breakdown.
RMB = Pn /2Qn /2
,
(4.4)
1
2
where n1 is the number of the point at which the tun-
neling takes place between the relevant orbits and n2 at
which the reflection occurs. Since the β branch origi-
nates from the X1 orbit as shown in Fig. 7(b) and the
electron on the orbit was with no tunneling and with
reflecting at the two points z2, then n1 and n2 are 0
and 2, respectively. Thus RMB decreases with decreas-
ing the probability of the reflection at the point z2, that
is, with increasing the probability of tunneling to the X2
orbit, in the high field region. The resultant formula of
eq. (4.3) multiplied by RMB is fitted to the data obtained
with the fixed TD determined above. The fitted curve is
shown by the solid one in Fig. 8 and agrees well with the
experimental data. Then H0 is obtained to be 4.8 T.
As pointed out in §3, the π and ρ branches are con-
sidered to be paired ones, that is, they are considered to
originate from the different orbits on one “cocoon”-like
Fermi surface as shown in Fig. 9. The central thin orbit
on the surface is assumed to correspond to the π branch
and to be hyperboloidal described as eq. (4.2) and two
thick orbits at the both ends of surface to the ρ branch
and to be ellipsoidal as eq. (4.1). The (β, ζ) and (λ, ν)
pair branches on the similar “cocoon”-like surfaces have
the same relation to the (π, ρ) pair as shown in Fig. 9.
To verify the above model, using the fitted parameter
rx, ry and rz for the π branch as a hyperboloid and the
ρ branch as an ellipsoid, angular dependent frequencies
of (β, ζ) and (λ, ν) branches were calculated within the
In order to confirm magnetic breakdown mentioned
above in this sample, the field dependent amplitude of
the dHvA oscillation was analyzed for the β branch for
the [010] direction. According to the Lifshitz-Kosevich
formula, the field dependent amplitude, ALK, is de-
scribed as follow,17)
exp(−2π2kBTD/βH)
sinh(2π2kBT/βH)
ALK ∼ H−1/2
,
(4.3)
where β = e¯h/m∗c and TD is the Dingle temperature.
In the measurement with the field modulation method,
the amplitude of the dHvA signal is obtained to be
proportional to AAL multiplied by a Bessel function,
ꢀ
ꢁ
Jk 2πFh0H−2 . Figure 8 shows the field dependence
of the amplitude of β oscillation at the [010] direction.
The fitted result for the amplitude to eq. (4.3) below
2 T is shown by the broken curve in Fig. 8, where mag-
netic breakdown is ignored. Then TD is estimated to be
0.47 K using F = 270 T, m∗/m0 = 0.6, T = 0.65 K and
h0 = 9.8 × 10−3 T. As seen in Fig. 8, the broken curve
Fig. 9. Model of a “cocoon”-like Fermi surface corresponding to
(π, ρ) paired branches as projected on the (100) plane. The
central thin part corresponds to the π branch and the thick part
at the both ends to the ρ branch. The broken rectangle indicates
the Brillouin zone in magnetic state. The (β, ζ) and (λ, ν) paired
branches are obtained from the similar surfaces with the different
dimensions as shown in Fig. 7(b).
Fig. 8. Field dependence of the amplitude of β oscillation. The
broken curve is calculated using eq. (4.3) multiplied by the first
ꢀ
ꢁ
order Bessel function, J1 2πFh0H−2 . The solid curve shows
the result with the reduction factor RMB due to magnetic break-
down.