reactions including hydroxylative 1,6-enyne cyclization to
mercuric product 3 (1% yield) as well as ketones 4 (4%)
and 5 (4%) (Table 1, entry 1). The effects of varying the
5
11
give exomethylene five-membered ring products, cyclization
6
of 1-alkyn-5-ones leading to 2-methylfurans, arylalkyne
7
cyclization leading to dihydronaphthalene derivatives, and
biomimetic tandem cyclization of aryl-ene-yne derivatives
to give polycarbocycles. We have also reported that Hg-
Table 1. Hg(OTf)
2
-Catalyzed Reaction of 1 and H
yield (%)b
Oa
2
8
2 2
(OTf) ‚(TMU) showed highly efficient catalytic activity for
Hg(OTf)2
the hydration of terminal alkynes to give methyl ketones
under very mild conditions. That reaction is far more
efficient than the more commonly used general procedure,
2 4
which employs a significant amount of HgO and H SO in
refluxing aqueous methanol.10 It is well-known that the
hydration of internal alkyne bonds produces a regioisomeric
mixture of ketones, and thus, it is a practically useless
reaction. Consequently, we tried to control the regioselec-
2
tivity of Hg(OTf) -catalyzed hydration of internal alkynes
by using neighboring group participation and examined the
entry
(mol %)
solvent
H O equiv
2
3
4
5
1
2
9
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
1
CH3CN
CH3CN
CH3CN
CH3CN
CH Cl
1.5
1.1
3.0
5.0
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
1.5
82
71
66
53
14
16
64
16
74
1
2
4
5
2
2
4
3
3
4
4
4
9
1
14 12
72
2
2
C6H5CH3
CH3NO2
CH3CN
CH3CN
4
68
1
4
75
5
c
5
3
3
a
b
reaction of propargyl acetate 1 with water in the presence
of a catalytic amount of Hg(OTf) (Scheme 1). Contrary to
2
Reactions were carried out at room temperature for 4 h. NMR yield
using mesitylene as the internal standard. c Reaction in the presence of TMU
(5 mol %).
Scheme 1
amount of water on the yield of vinyl ketone were investi-
gated at 1.5, 1.1, 3, and 5 equiv, and the 1.5 equiv was shown
to be the best (Table 1, entries 1-4). Water insoluble
dichloromethane and toluene were shown to be useless as
solvent affording significant amounts of starting material
(Table 1, entries 5 and 6), and nitromethane was not as good
as acetonitrile (Table 1, entry 7). One mol % of catalyst was
not enough to complete the reaction (Table 1, entry 8).
Reaction in the presence of TMU (5 mol %) produced a
higher quantity of 3, and the yield of vinyl ketone 2 was
7
4% at room temperature for 4 h (Table 1, entry 9).
Next, we investigated the reactions of a variety of
-cyclohexyl-2-butynyl esters 6a-k (Scheme 2). By com-
expectation, the major product was not the expected hydra-
tion products 4 or 5 but was vinyl ketone 2.1 A strange
dimeric vinyl mercuric product 3 was also detected in low
4
1a,b
parison with acetate 1 (Table 1, entry 1), 2-methylpropionate
6
a was converted to enone 2 in lower yield (73%) along
1
1c
yield.
To characterize the reaction, we first examined a reaction
of propargyl acetate 1 with 1.5 equiv of H O in the presence
of Hg(OTf) (5 mol %) in acetonitrile at room temperature.
with 3 (2%) and ketones 7a (5%) and 8a (5%) (Table 2,
entry 1). Pivalate 6b, methoxy acetate 6c, and monochlo-
roacetate 6d also produced enone 2 in moderate yield within
several hours (Table 2, entries 2-4). p-Methoxybenzoate 6e,
p-nitrobenzoate 6f, and pentafluorobenzoate 6g formed
product 2 only in poor to moderate yield after 24 h (Table
2
12
2
The reaction was completed within 4 h, and vinyl ketone 2
was obtained in 84% yield after column chromatography on
silica gel. The yield before purification, as measured by
NMR, was 82%. Additional products included the dimeric
2
, entries 5-7). Surprisingly, benzoate 6h and 2,4,6-
trichlorobenzoate 6i produced no trace of products at all
Table 2, entries 8 and 9). On the other hand, formate 6j
produced 2 in 51% yield along with 3 (2%) and ketones 7j
2%) and 8j (4%) (Table 2, entry 10). The mother alcohol
k was entirely inert under the standard reaction conditions,
(
(
5) Nishizawa, M.; Yadav, V. K.; Skwarczynski, M.; Takao, H.;
Imagawa, H.; Sugihara, T. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 1609-1611.
6) Imagawa, H.; Kurisaki, T.; Nishizawa, M. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 3679-
681.
7) Nishizawa, M.; Takao, H.; Yadav, V. K.; Imagawa, H.; Sugihara, T.
Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 4563-4565.
8) (a) Imagawa, H.; Iyenaga, T.; Nishizawa, M. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 451-
53. (b) Imagawa, H.; Iyenaga, T.; Nishizawa, M. Synlett 2005, 703-705.
9) Nishizawa, M.; Skwarczynski, M.; Imagawa, H.; Sugihara, T. Chem.
Lett. 2002, 12-13.
10) (a) Thomas, R. J.; Campbell, K. N.; Hennion, G. F. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1938, 60, 718-720. (b) Stacy, G. W.; Mikulec, R. A. Org. Synth.
963, 4, 13-15.
11) (a) Murai, A.; Abiko, A.; Shimada, N.; Masamune, T. Tetrahedron
(
(
6
3
(
and all starting materials were recovered (Table 2, entry 11).
(
4
(
(12) Typical experimental procedure is as follows. To a stirred solution
of propargyl acetate 1 (194 mg, 1.0 mmol) and water (27 mg, 1.5 mmol,
1.5 equiv) in acetonitrile (9.5 mL) was added 0.5 mL of 0.1 M Hg(OTf)2
(0.5 mL, 5 mol %) in acetonitrile at room temperature under argon, and
the mixture was allowed to stir at the same temperature for 4 h. After
addition of aqueous NaHCO3, the organic material was extracted with ether.
Dried and concentrated material was subjected to a column chromatography
on silica gel using pentane and ether as eluent to give enone 2 (128 mg,
84% yield, NMR yield 82%) and a mixture of dimeric mercury compound
3 (NMR yield 1%, determined by using mesitylene as an internal standard),
ketones 4 (NMR yield 2%), and ketone 5 (NMR yield 6%).
(
1
(
Lett. 1984, 25, 4951-4954. (b) Satoh, T.; Kumagawa, T.; Yamakawa, K.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1986, 27, 2471-2474. (c) Szemenyei, D.; Steichen, D.;
Byrd, J. E. J. Mol. Cat. 1977, 2, 105-117. (d) Choudary, B. M.; Prasad,
A. D.; Swapna, V.; Valli, V. L. K.; Bhuma, V. Tetrahedron 1992, 48, 953-
9
62. (e) Cahiez, G.; Bernard, D.; Normant, J. F. Synthesis 1977, 130-133.
448
Org. Lett., Vol. 8, No. 3, 2006