.
Angewandte
Communications
Scheme 2. Preparation of A-ring keto-aldehyde 4. Reagents and con-
ditions: a) NaBH4, CeCl3, MeOH, À788C to 08C; b) m-CPBA, CH2Cl2,
08C; c) TBSCl, imid, CH2Cl2, 08C to RT, 65% over 3 steps; d) BF3·OEt2,
CH2Cl2, À208C, 78%, 19:1 d.r.; e) NaH, RT, 72 h, 73%, >19:1 (E):(Z);
f) LiAlH4, Et2O, 08C; g) Ac2O, py, DMAP, CH2Cl2, RT, 77% over 2
steps; h) LDA, TBSCl, THF, À788C to RT; PhH, reflux, 16 h, 10:1 d.r.;
i) LiAlH4, Et2O, 08C, 63% over 2 steps; j) 3n HCl, MeOH, (1:3), RT;
k) DMSO, (COCl)2, Et3N, CH2Cl2, À788C to RT, 74% over 2 steps.
m-CPBA=3-chloroperoxybenzoic acid, DMAP=N,N-dimethyl-4-amino-
pyridine, DMSO=dimethylsulfoxide, imid=imidazole, LDA=lithium
diisopropylamide, py=pyridine, TBS=tert-butyldimethylsilyl, THF=
tetrahydrofuran.
Scheme 3. Preparation of ABC-tricycle 2. Reagents and conditions:
a) Bu2BOTf, iPr2NEt, THF, À788C to À208C, 98%, 2:1 d.r.; b) DMP,
NaHCO3, CH2Cl2, 83%; c) TESCl, imid, DMF, RT, 15: 65%, 11-epi-15:
29%; d) SmI2, 658C, 2 h, 51%; e) PPTS, MeOH, CH2Cl2, RT, 88%;
f) PCC, NaOAc, SiO2, CH2Cl2, 2: 81%, 18: 11%. DMF=N,N-dimethyl-
formamide, DMP=Dess–Martin periodinane, PCC=pyridinium
chlorochromate, PPTS=pyridinium para-toluenesulfonate, TES=
triethylsilyl.
yield from 11. Finally, hydrolysis of the TBS ether and double
oxidation under Swern conditions gave the targeted aldehyde
4 in 74% yield (13% overall from 6).
Initial approaches at appending the C-ring butenolide
through addition of 3-metallated furyl derivatives to 4 all met
with failure, with optimally only trace amounts of adducts
observed.[13] By contrast (Scheme 3), it was found that
butenolide 5[14] and aldehyde 4 could be smoothly coupled
through a boron-mediated aldol reaction, which provided
adducts 13 as a 2:1 mixture of diastereomeric alcohols in
almost quantitative yield.[15] At this stage, with a view to
effecting the crucial reductive cyclization reaction to close the
central B-ring, alcohols 13 were oxidized to provide tricar-
bonyl 14. Disappointingly however, no productive cyclization
Figure 1. a) X-ray crystal structure of alcohol 17. b) Possible samarium-
chelate transition structure leading to 16.
generation of a single cycloadduct (51%), identified as 16 on
the basis of NMR and computational analysis.[10,18] More
rigorous structural proof was subsequently obtained through
X-ray crystallographic analysis of alcohol 17, formed upon
acid-mediated desilylation of 16 (Figure 1a).[19] Subsequent
oxidation with PCC then delivered the targeted ABC-ketone
2 (81%)[19] along with diol 18 (11%), containing the requisite
oxygenation at C10.[20] Attempts to encourage complete
oxidation to 18 were unsuccessful however.
The desired stereochemical outcome of the SmI2-medi-
ated reductive cyclization reaction of 15 is consistent with
a chelated boat-type transition structure such as 19 (Fig-
ure 1b), in which the C11 substituent is equatorially dis-
posed.[21] This may explain the failure of the epimeric C11
TES ether (natural configuration, pseudo-axially disposed) to
undergo analogous cyclization, attesting, along with failed
of 14 could be induced under a range of conditions utilizing
[16]
either SmI2
or alternative reagents,[17] returning only
starting material or, under more forcing conditions, decom-
position products. A similar situation was observed for
alcohols 13. The apparent instability of 14 with respect to
potential reagents for cyclization led to the examination of
TES ethers 15 and 11-epi-15 as alternative substrates, which
were chromatographically separable. Now, gratifyingly, it was
found that addition of 15 to a freshly prepared solution of
SmI2 (ca. 6 equiv) in THF and heating to 658C, led to the
2
ꢀ 2014 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 1 – 5
These are not the final page numbers!