6
Journal of Chemical Research 00(0)
Table 2. Selected bond lengths (Å) for compounds 1 and 2.
1
2
Eu(1)—O(1)
Eu(1)—O(3)i
Eu(1)—O(5)
Eu(1)—O(6)ii
Eu(1)—O(8)iv
2.055(14)
2.083(12)
2.039(13)
2.068(14)
Eu(1)—O(2)
Eu(4)—O(1)i
Eu(1)—O(6)ii
Eu(1)—O(7)iii
1.971(13)
2.042(12)
2.071(14)
2.008(12)
La(1)—O(1)
La(1)—O(3)i
La(1)—O(5)ii
La(1)—O(6)
La(1)—O(8)iv
2.522(3)
2.512(4)
2.584(4)
2.756(3)
2.569(4)
La(1)—O(2)
La(1)—O(4)i
La(1)—O(6)ii
La(1)—O(7)iii
2.523(3)
2.531(3)
2.493(3)
2.573(4)
Symmetry codes: 1 and 2: #i x, 3/2-y, 1/2+z; #ii 1-x, 1-y, -z; #iii x, y, -1+z; #iv 1-x, 1-y, 1-z.
(s), 3420 (s), 3140 (s), 3090 (m), 3010 (w), 1670 (w), 1610 Declaration of conflicting interests
(s), 1440 (m), 1400 (w), 1310 (m), 1170 (s), 1130 (s), 1020
The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with
respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this
article.
(m), 936 (m), 886(m), 867 (m), 837 (s), 778 (s), 630 (s), 482
(w), 424 (w). Analysis for 2: C11H11LaN2O8: Calcd (%): C,
30.13; H, 2.51; N, 6.39. Found (%): C, 29.76; H, 2.74; N,
6.12. IR: 3410 (s), 3140 (s), 3090 (m), 3030 (w), 1690 (w),
1620 (s), 1450 (m), 1380 (w), 1320 (m), 1180 (s), 1140 (s),
1010 (m), 946 (m), 906 (w), 886 (m), 847 (s), 788 (s), 640
(s), 493 (w), 424 (w).
Funding
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support
for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This
study was supported by the Key Scientific and Technological
Research Projects in Henan Province (192102210028) and the
National Natural Science Foundation of China (51602358,
51564017, and 51774155).
Single-crystal structure determination
The X-ray diffraction data for 1 and 2 were collected on a
Bruker Smart Apex II CCD equipped with a Mo-Kα radi-
ation source (λ = 0.71073\%A). The data were integrated
by using the SAINT program.30 The program SADABS
was used for the absorption correction.31 The structures
were solved by direct methods and refined on F2 by full-
matrix least-squares methods using the Olex2 and
SHELXTL program package.32,33 All hydrogen atoms
were refined isotropically as a riding mode using the
default SHELXTL parameters. All non-hydrogen atoms
were refined anisotropically, with C—H = 0.93–0.97Å
and Uiso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C). The maximum residual electron-
density peak and hole were located at −0.783 and 1.049eÅ3
for the Eu1 atom and at −0.927 and 1.265eÅ3 for the La1
atom, respectively. The crystallographic data and struc-
tural refinements and the selected bond lengths for 1 and
2 are shown in Tables 1 and 2, respectively. CCDC
1833928 and 1833929 contain the supplementary crystal-
lographic data. The data can be obtained free of charge
from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via
ORCID iD
Bin Cai
Supplementary material
Supplemental material for this article is available online.
References
1. Ma J and Yan B. Dyes Pigments 2018; 153: 266.
2. Wen J, Guo ZD, Guo H, et al. Inorg Chem 2018; 57: 6142.
3. Latendresse TP, Vieru V, Wilkins BO, et al. Angew Chem
2018; 130: 8296.
4. Ronda CR, Justel T and Nikol H. J Alloy Comp 1998; 275: 669.
5. Hemmila IA. Applications of fluorescence in immunoassays.
New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1991.
6. Prodi L, Bolletta F, Montalti M, et al. Coord Chem Rev 2000;
205: 59.
7. Lakowicz JR. Topics in fluorescence spectroscopy, vol. 4.
New York: Plenum Press, 1994.
8. Fabbrizzi L and Poggi A. Chem Soc Rev 1995; 24: 197.
9. Richardson FS. Chem Rev 1982; 82: 541.
10. Carlos LD, Ferreira RAS, Bermudez VD, et al. Chem Soc
Rev 2011; 40: 536.
11. Feyisa BR, Ye JW, Sun Y, et al. Dalton Trans 2016; 45: 11137.
12. Hao H, Liu H, Wang Y, et al. J Acta Cryst 2018; C74: 221.
Fluorescence probing measurement
Finely ground crystalline material of 1 (5mg) was dis- 13. Huang YQ, Chen HY, Wang Y, et al. RSC Adv 2018; 8: 21444.
14. Sather AC, Berryman OB and Rebek J. J Am Chem Soc
persed in EtOH (5mL) to make a homogeneous suspension
after ultrasonic treatment for about 15min. Different vol-
umes of 10mM UO2 aqueous solution were added to
2010; 132: 13572.
15. Park J, Jeters RT, Kuo LJ, et al. Ind Eng Chem Res 2016;
55: 4278.
16. Cooper KL, Dashner EJ, Tsosie R, et al. Toxicol Appl
Pharmacol 2016; 291: 13.
17. Du N, Song J, Li S, et al. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2016;
8: 28718.
18. Liu W, Dai X, Bai ZL, et al. Environ Sci Technol 2017;
51: 3911.
19. Ye J, Bogale RF, Shi Y, et al. Chem Eur J 2017; 23: 7657.
20. Wang Y, Xing SH, Bai FY, et al. Inorg Chem 2018; 57: 12850.
2+
form the tested suspensions, with the uranyl concentration
ranging from 0 to 95µM/L, after ultrasonic treatment for
5min. To examine the influence of competing metal ions,
the uranyl solution was replaced by 10mM of different
metal nitrates to form the tested suspensions with 50µM
competing metal ions, respectively. To eliminate errors, all
of the fluorescence spectra were measured in parallel three
times to obtain average data under the same conditions.